Sakuragi_ wrote:There's no way Wiggins can bust. His floor is an elite defender who can draw fouls.
Who did he shut down?
No way Darko can bust, or Beasley, or Williams, or Oden, or Bargs, or Kandiman, etc...
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Sakuragi_ wrote:There's no way Wiggins can bust. His floor is an elite defender who can draw fouls.
Sakuragi_ wrote:Saltine wrote:MaxMN wrote:My gut is telling me that the Cavs won't trade Wiggins for Love.
Good. Chicago has a better deal
My gut tells me Wiggins may be Wes Johnson 2.0
My gut tells me the Chicago deal would make us a perennial 9th-11th seed for 5 years.
Sakuragi_ wrote:Listening to Dan B. yesterday and he was pretty adamant on the Wolves not trading Martin...for now.
Flip isn't trying to 'dump' him and he still has value.
Martin could be dealt soon. It's just a matter of how long it takes for Lavine to develop.
And again he was adamant in saying this. He is pretty cool with Flip so I will give him benefit of the doubt.
Swish4 wrote:I think Martin's best role is as a sixth man instant offense type. Watch his matchups and minutes and he'd be very effective.
eroomlladnar wrote:Swish4 wrote:I think Martin's best role is as a sixth man instant offense type. Watch his matchups and minutes and he'd be very effective.
Yep, he eats up backup SG's.
I'd love for Flip to go ahead and start LaVine at the 2 and let Martin come off the bench as instant offense.
Duke4life831 wrote:Winslow > Wiggins
jbk1234 wrote:My concern has never been with how good Love is or whether he's worth Wiggins and Bennett. My concern has always been that this could be a disaster if, for any reason, Love doesn't exercise his PO. I'd make it a condition of the trade. With all due respect to SAS and Broussard, a second-hand, or even third-hand report, about a player's future intentions isn't enough of an assurance to part with Wiggins in the absence of that option actually getting picked up.
Sakuragi_ wrote:We can talk all day about how dumb some of their fans are. Let's not waste time with that.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:If you guys keep it up, I'm going to start warning some Wolves fans for their behavior in this thread, too. You aren't doing yourselves any favors.
-Klomp
eroomlladnar wrote:Klomp wrote:If you guys keep it up, I'm going to start warning some Wolves fans for their behavior in this thread, too. You aren't doing yourselves any favors.
-Klomp
Well when we've heard for 92 pages that are team sucks, franchise is in a no-win situation, take our crap and be happy with it, you'll be lucky to win 20 games next year, etc.
It gets old, especially on a TWolves board.
No offense
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves