Page 18 of 28

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:08 pm
by KGdaBom
winforlose wrote:Fun fact and unreal stat, (courtesy of Flagrant Howls,) “The Wolves are 7 points worse per 100 possessions when Kyle Anderson is on the court.”

Can we trade him yet!?

In my best Nostradamus prediction.... NO.

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2024 7:24 pm
by winforlose
“ Law Murray: Anthony Edwards mentioned that Rudy Gobert cussed team out at halftime “English or French?” Ant: “English. We don’t know French.” 9 hours ago – via Twitter LawMurrayTheNU
Anthony Edwards, Rudy Gobert, Minnesota Timberwolves”

Copied from hoopshype.

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2024 9:50 pm
by Klomp
Read on Twitter

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2024 10:07 pm
by winforlose
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Take it one step further. We blew a lead against OKC, against Boston, against Dallas, and should have beat the Knicks but for some uncharacteristically bad first half play. It’s not like we got blown out in all 11. We are actually better than our record suggests, and we are the best in the west, 2nd best in the NBA, and best against good teams.

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2024 10:10 pm
by KGdaBom
winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Take it one step further. We blew a lead against OKC, against Boston, against Dallas, and should have beat the Knicks but for some uncharacteristically bad first half play. It’s not like we got blown out in all 11. We are actually better than our record suggests, and we are the best in the west, 2nd best in the NBA, and best against good teams.

I appreciate this. Most Wolves fans think we are far worse than our record suggests. Some go so far as to think we are bad or even suck. I've just been going by we are who our record says we are.

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2024 10:22 pm
by winforlose
KGdaBom wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Take it one step further. We blew a lead against OKC, against Boston, against Dallas, and should have beat the Knicks but for some uncharacteristically bad first half play. It’s not like we got blown out in all 11. We are actually better than our record suggests, and we are the best in the west, 2nd best in the NBA, and best against good teams.

I appreciate this. Most Wolves fans think we are far worse than our record suggests. Some go so far as to think we are bad or even suck. I've just been going by we are who our record says we are.


Detroit is a great example of a team better than their record. They play great in the first half, compete very well with top teams in both conferences, then find ways to lose. We find ways to lose games we should win. Starting with Atlanta and most recently Chicago with at least half a dozen examples in between. We are good enough to go up 20, we should be good enough to win by at least 10.

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2024 10:51 pm
by KGdaBom
winforlose wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
winforlose wrote:
Take it one step further. We blew a lead against OKC, against Boston, against Dallas, and should have beat the Knicks but for some uncharacteristically bad first half play. It’s not like we got blown out in all 11. We are actually better than our record suggests, and we are the best in the west, 2nd best in the NBA, and best against good teams.

I appreciate this. Most Wolves fans think we are far worse than our record suggests. Some go so far as to think we are bad or even suck. I've just been going by we are who our record says we are.


Detroit is a great example of a team better than their record. They play great in the first half, compete very well with top teams in both conferences, then find ways to lose. We find ways to lose games we should win. Starting with Atlanta and most recently Chicago with at least half a dozen examples in between. We are good enough to go up 20, we should be good enough to win by at least 10.

We should, but we have some amazing chokes. Then again we beat OKC, and crushed Milwaukee and the Clippers in our last 3 against contenders. That's why I maintain we are what our record says we are. No better no worse.

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 12:32 am
by Klomp
Read on Twitter

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 12:34 am
by Klomp
Read on Twitter

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 12:53 am
by winforlose
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


I wonder what Karl is averaging in 3PA and 3PM in that time?

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 5:34 am
by winforlose
My brother just sent me this. Unreal and infuriating.

The link failed. Correction, it was a survey of NBA players with 98 voting. Jaden got 5.4 votes. Rudy and NAW not listed.

It was presented as a chart from the athletic.

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 5:38 am
by KGdaBom
winforlose wrote:My brother just sent me this. Unreal and infuriating.

The link failed. Correction, it was a survey of NBA players with 98 voting. Jaden got 5.4 votes. Rudy and NAW not listed.

It was presented as a chart from the athletic.

Voting for what? How can Jaden get 5.4 votes?

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 6:15 am
by winforlose
KGdaBom wrote:
winforlose wrote:My brother just sent me this. Unreal and infuriating.

The link failed. Correction, it was a survey of NBA players with 98 voting. Jaden got 5.4 votes. Rudy and NAW not listed.

It was presented as a chart from the athletic.

Voting for what? How can Jaden get 5.4 votes?


I think it was by percentage of the 98. It was a player vote for best defender in the league.

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 6:41 am
by winforlose
Worth noting as a fun fact, we are 22 games above .500.

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 10:39 am
by KGdaBom
winforlose wrote:Worth noting as a fun fact, we are 22 games above .500.

98 votes and not one for Rudy? Something is wrong.

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:52 am
by winforlose
KGdaBom wrote:
winforlose wrote:Worth noting as a fun fact, we are 22 games above .500.

98 votes and not one for Rudy? Something is wrong.


That is literally what I texted back. All he sent me was a graphic from the athletic. Maybe someone on here who has a membership can look it up?

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:16 pm
by frankenwolf
winforlose wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
winforlose wrote:Worth noting as a fun fact, we are 22 games above .500.

98 votes and not one for Rudy? Something is wrong.


That is literally what I texted back. All he sent me was a graphic from the athletic. Maybe someone on here who has a membership can look it up?


I've looked and can not find anything, but it may be buried in an unrelated column

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:31 pm
by frankenwolf
KGdaBom wrote:
winforlose wrote:My brother just sent me this. Unreal and infuriating.

The link failed. Correction, it was a survey of NBA players with 98 voting. Jaden got 5.4 votes. Rudy and NAW not listed.

It was presented as a chart from the athletic.

Voting for what? How can Jaden get 5.4 votes?


Found it!! It was an April, 2023 post. It was the Athletics year end anonymous player poll. Reflects nothing current, obviously. Old, dead, news

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:03 pm
by KGdaBom
frankenwolf wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
winforlose wrote:My brother just sent me this. Unreal and infuriating.

The link failed. Correction, it was a survey of NBA players with 98 voting. Jaden got 5.4 votes. Rudy and NAW not listed.

It was presented as a chart from the athletic.

Voting for what? How can Jaden get 5.4 votes?


Found it!! It was an April, 2023 post. It was the Athletics year end anonymous player poll. Reflects nothing current, obviously. Old, dead, news

Thanks. :D

Re: Fun facts and unreal stats

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 4:05 pm
by winforlose
frankenwolf wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
winforlose wrote:My brother just sent me this. Unreal and infuriating.

The link failed. Correction, it was a survey of NBA players with 98 voting. Jaden got 5.4 votes. Rudy and NAW not listed.

It was presented as a chart from the athletic.

Voting for what? How can Jaden get 5.4 votes?


Found it!! It was an April, 2023 post. It was the Athletics year end anonymous player poll. Reflects nothing current, obviously. Old, dead, news


Gonna mock my brother for this one. Good find and thank you :)