Esohny wrote:That's an unfortunate thread. The Dark Lord was totally on point though.
Strong the force was with that one.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Esohny wrote:That's an unfortunate thread. The Dark Lord was totally on point though.
urinesane wrote:I think everyone needs to read this old thread over again to get a better idea of what the fans ACTUALLY thought back when Love signed the 4 year deal:
http://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=1155499
You'll see a lot of parallels to the current Rubio situation and conversation.
There weren't nearly as many people angry about the 4th year or worried about not giving the 5th year as you'd think by the current conversations.
Klomp wrote:Something to consider...
If Rubio gets the five-year max, we won't be able to offer it to Zach LaVine.
Krapinsky wrote:Wolves_Nation wrote:Time to inform everyone who says Rubio's issue is his shooting. That is not the case. His issues are stamina, (Which declined from the ACL), and his contact shot.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... ting/2014/
Everyone should take a look at his shooting splits.
Split Value FG FGA FG% 3P 3PA 3P% eFG% Ast'd %Ast'd
1st 98 226 .434 13 34 .382 .462 31 .316
2nd 38 119 .319 8 27 .296 .353 15 .395
3rd 91 225 .404 18 49 .367 .444 24 .264
4th 25 92 .272 5 21 .238 .299 10 .400
OT 3 8 .375 0 2 .000 .375 0 .000
It's worth noting that 1st quarter holds his highest %, followed by the 3rd. Obviously that has to do with the rest.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... lits/2014/
If you then look at other splits, including month by month, you'd notice there is a steady rise in his shooting as the season progresses. Rest is another big one. With 2 days rest, he shot 49.6%, with no rest 36.6%. Not a coincidence.
Why does this happen? He was recovering from the ACL early on, and this is him increasing stamina and his ability to complete contact shots.
That's an interesting tidbit, but it doesn't take Dr. James Naismith to see his shot is broken. Just look at his jump shot. It's broke. But you're right, tired legs and a broke jump shot doesn't make it any better.
urinesane wrote:big3_8_19_21 wrote:To me LaVine is irrelevant to the fact that RUBIO IS NOT WORTH A FIVE YEAR MAX CONTRACT
Who on the Wolves current roster is?
How long do you save it for?
"Each team in the NBA can nominate a rookie player to receive a "Designated Player" contract extension. A Designated Player is eligible for a 5-year contract extension, instead of being held to the standard 4-year restriction.[6] A team can only allocate a single Designated Player contract at any one time (if a team has already extended a rookie contract by using the Designated Player extension they cannot create a second Designated Player contract until the current contract expires, or until the player moves to a different team);"
Are we only going to use it if we get a Lebron/Durant level player at some point?
Worm Guts wrote:urinesane wrote:big3_8_19_21 wrote:To me LaVine is irrelevant to the fact that RUBIO IS NOT WORTH A FIVE YEAR MAX CONTRACT
Who on the Wolves current roster is?
How long do you save it for?
"Each team in the NBA can nominate a rookie player to receive a "Designated Player" contract extension. A Designated Player is eligible for a 5-year contract extension, instead of being held to the standard 4-year restriction.[6] A team can only allocate a single Designated Player contract at any one time (if a team has already extended a rookie contract by using the Designated Player extension they cannot create a second Designated Player contract until the current contract expires, or until the player moves to a different team);"
Are we only going to use it if we get a Lebron/Durant level player at some point?
The idea of giving a max contract out just because we can is pretty ridiculous
Wolves_Nation wrote:Time to inform everyone who says Rubio's issue is his shooting. That is not the case. His issues are stamina, (Which declined from the ACL), and his contact shot.
lobishome wrote:Klomp wrote:Something to consider...
If Rubio gets the five-year max, we won't be able to offer it to Zach LaVine.
NO, Lavine and Wiggins are still RFAs when Ricky ends his max five years contract. Give Ricky the MAX and Dan Fegan his 20 percent, and the future is the future.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
urinesane wrote:If the Wolves get Wiggins, it may be better long term for both franchises.
If Rubio is going to become the player many thought he could (and I still think can) he needed to be thrust into the leadership role.
The balance on this team was obviously a factor, especially when it came to the pairing of Love/Pek down low (offering zero rim protection). Then having Rubio on the wings working his butt off, but having Kmart's D and Brew's itch to gamble next to him.
All of a sudden the roster of this team looks like it could be a quick rebuild.
- Rubio may gain the most out of a deal for Wiggins. If they can get rid of Kmart and JJ, all of a sudden this team looks a lot more athletic (even faster than last year's squad) and a lot better defensively. I think he will improve his shooting this offseason, and Love being gone (as well as possibly Kmart) he won't feel the pressure of making the top 3 guys happy by getting enough touches. He will be able to be aggressive and establish his offense early, which many times made the difference between him struggling or looking brilliant last season.
I think he will shift his mindset on offense, much like he did at the end of his second season. He had some pretty high scoring games (a great one against the Bucks) and did a solid job of taking on a decent chunk of the scoring load. He needs to have a Nash mindset and make sure that he establishes himself as a scoring threat, and he doesn't have to shoot like Nash to do it.
- Lavine seems like he could be a very nice SG next to Rubio, with his ability to spot up shoot as well as his speed and ability to score in transition. It's also nice that he can handle the ball, which only adds options for the Wolves to use in different lineups. He should be the starting SG of the future though if he develops.
- Wiggins may not know it, but this could be the best thing for his future in the NBA. If the Cavs keep him and don't get Love, he is automatically burdened with the pressure of being the 3rd piece in a championship team. That is too much for any 19 year old to take on, especially one that will need time to develop his offense. Having one of the most unselfish guards in the league will be way more beneficial for his offensive confidence to grow than it would with a scoring PG like Irving.
- Dieng will play at the PF spot where he will match up size wise better with most PFs and offer shotblocking down low and will make a great rebounding duo with Pek. If he just develops his post offense and midrange shot, he will be very Serge Ibaka like and the best defender for the Wolves since KG.
- Pek will benefit by getting more touches down low, especially in half court action, since Love and Kmart won't need their touches. His defense isn't actually bad, he has great positioning and footwork and has really improved since his rookie year. He defends well without fouling, but with Dieng vs Love, guards and larger Centers won't feel so easy going at Pek with Dieng's shotblocking (as well as Wiggins shotblocking) looming over them.
All of a sudden this team goes from being a super offensive mismatch of weapons, but with under sized and skilled defense. To a freakishly athletic squad with a wizard running your offense, a bruising scoring, shot blocking and rebounding duo in Pek/Dieng.
Lavine a long speedy defender (who keeps his man in front of him) and is great at moving without the ball and getting out in transition (which are both great compliments to Rubio's game).
Throw in a potential superstar and worst case great defender in Wiggins, and all of a sudden things don't look so gloomy for the future of this franchise. You all of a sudden get extremely young and talented on good contracts (Pek has a good contract, especially if he becomes a 20/10 guy).
frankenwolf wrote:I hope you eat every one of these words next year when the Timberwolves are world champions
criteriado wrote:My worry with Ricky and RFA is signing a 3/33 contract with an opt out after year two. Then you're ****.
C.lupus wrote:criteriado wrote:My worry with Ricky and RFA is signing a 3/33 contract with an opt out after year two. Then you're ****.
Flip is smarter than Kahn and Taylor has learned his lesson. Don't see that happening.
Duke4life831 wrote:Winslow > Wiggins
C.lupus wrote:criteriado wrote:My worry with Ricky and RFA is signing a 3/33 contract with an opt out after year two. Then you're ****.
Flip is smarter than Kahn and Taylor has learned his lesson. Don't see that happening.
criteriado wrote:My worry with Ricky and RFA is signing a 3/33 contract with an opt out after year two. Then you're ****.
criteriado wrote:C.lupus wrote:criteriado wrote:My worry with Ricky and RFA is signing a 3/33 contract with an opt out after year two. Then you're ****.
Flip is smarter than Kahn and Taylor has learned his lesson. Don't see that happening.
Well, he can go to another team as an RFA to sign an offer sheet like that. Parsons did that.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves