ImageImageImage

Pick Watch 2013

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
NikolaPekovic
Rookie
Posts: 1,117
And1: 344
Joined: Jun 27, 2012
 

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#121 » by NikolaPekovic » Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:58 am

Gideon wrote:If Noel drops because of his injury, I think he would be an incredible steal anywhere outside of the top 2 or 3. I'm actually really high on Noel. I know he doesn't fit our needs positionally


the thing s he does fit a need. an athletic, defensive big man. probly the 2nd biggest need for our team.
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,817
And1: 1,104
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#122 » by cpfsf » Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:30 am

i'm not endorsing trading the pick. just wondering though, has there been any offers on the trade board yet?
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Gideon
Pro Prospect
Posts: 830
And1: 178
Joined: Feb 29, 2012

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#123 » by Gideon » Fri Mar 1, 2013 12:22 am

NikolaPekovic wrote:
Gideon wrote:If Noel drops because of his injury, I think he would be an incredible steal anywhere outside of the top 2 or 3. I'm actually really high on Noel. I know he doesn't fit our needs positionally


the thing s he does fit a need. an athletic, defensive big man. probly the 2nd biggest need for our team.


I agree that Noel fits a need right now... but I also feel like you don't draft somebody on his level to be a back-up. Sure, in his first season (which he will probably miss the start of anyway and then be coming back from injury) it would likely be fine for him to back up Love and Pek and play 28 mpg or whatever, but in the long run somebody that talented drafted that high isn't meant to be a back up. Pek and Love are also too good to be back ups IMO, so somebody would probably have to be dealt at some point.

It probably would have been more accurate of me to say he would cause a positional logjam than that he doesn't fit a current need. I would still lean towards picking him if it's viable, but I think this issue would have to be addressed of moving either Pek or Love (if not now than a season from now) if we pick Noel. I'm really all for drafting Noel -- however I don't want to pick him and then under-utilize him in the maddening way the Jazz have with Favors... so there is the big issue of whether we are willing to move Love or Pek if we draft Noel.
User avatar
NikolaPekovic
Rookie
Posts: 1,117
And1: 344
Joined: Jun 27, 2012
 

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#124 » by NikolaPekovic » Fri Mar 1, 2013 12:41 am

Gideon wrote:
NikolaPekovic wrote:
Gideon wrote:If Noel drops because of his injury, I think he would be an incredible steal anywhere outside of the top 2 or 3. I'm actually really high on Noel. I know he doesn't fit our needs positionally


the thing s he does fit a need. an athletic, defensive big man. probly the 2nd biggest need for our team.


I agree that Noel fits a need right now... but I also feel like you don't draft somebody on his level to be a back-up. Sure, in his first season (which he will probably miss the start of anyway and then be coming back from injury) it would likely be fine for him to back up Love and Pek and play 28 mpg or whatever, but in the long run somebody that talented drafted that high isn't meant to be a back up. Pek and Love are also too good to be back ups IMO, so somebody would probably have to be dealt at some point.

It probably would have been more accurate of me to say he would cause a positional logjam than that he doesn't fit a current need. I would still lean towards picking him if it's viable, but I think this issue would have to be addressed of moving either Pek or Love (if not now than a season from now) if we pick Noel. I'm really all for drafting Noel -- however I don't want to pick him and then under-utilize him in the maddening way the Jazz have with Favors... so there is the big issue of whether we are willing to move Love or Pek if we draft Noel.


I see what you mean. But he still has alot of things to work out in his game. He could still be playing 20 mins a game as a rookie backup PF/C on a playoff team.

Drafting him gives us insurance as well. If pek doesn't end up being worth his contract after we see him next to love than we can move on with the Love/Noel frontcourt combo for the future. Which could end up being one of the best Big men duos in the league depending on how Noel devolops.
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#125 » by [RCG] » Fri Mar 1, 2013 1:11 am

Starting doesn't really matter as long as he gets good minutes. Someone is bound to get injured or miss a couple games here or there too.

Love(36)/Noel(12)
Pekovic(30)/Noel(18)
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Gideon
Pro Prospect
Posts: 830
And1: 178
Joined: Feb 29, 2012

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#126 » by Gideon » Fri Mar 1, 2013 1:36 am

[RCG] wrote:Starting doesn't really matter as long as he gets good minutes. Someone is bound to get injured or miss a couple games here or there too.

Love(36)/Noel(12)
Pekovic(30)/Noel(18)


I suppose we could draft him now and just keep an eye on the situation and do what we have to do in a year or two... I'm ok with that approach, but I really just don't want to stifle young talent the way Utah has. I know people argue that you can rotate three high-level players for two positions, but it's not an idea I'm fond of, and I think it rarely works well with young talented players who are capable of being big contributors.
User avatar
NikolaPekovic
Rookie
Posts: 1,117
And1: 344
Joined: Jun 27, 2012
 

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#127 » by NikolaPekovic » Fri Mar 1, 2013 2:08 am

http://espn.go.com/nba/lottery2013/mockdraft


Well what i can tell from the generator. Marcus smart is a top 5 pick forsure, he was taken with the first pick by alot of teams. I did it about 20 times and never got the first pick. Portland even got it with a .06%... lol.

It basically has us taking Mcelmore, Noel, Oladipo, then Shabazz in that order.



Oladipo was often taken before shabazz, so heres to hoping one of our guys will be there at 8.
Murphs56
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,688
And1: 1,239
Joined: Nov 13, 2012
       

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#128 » by Murphs56 » Sat Mar 2, 2013 8:47 am

I really think we can become the third worst team in the NBA with our injuries. My big fear is Love and Budinger are going to win a lot of games when they come back though.
User avatar
Grits n Gravy
General Manager
Posts: 9,620
And1: 1,800
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: New Zealand
 

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#129 » by Grits n Gravy » Sat Mar 2, 2013 10:23 am

Murphs56 wrote:I really think we can become the third worst team in the NBA with our injuries. My big fear is Love and Budinger are going to win a lot of games when they come back though.

i'm really not sure personally but i think you might be right. we have a very tough 10 games coming up that, in light of injuries - depending on the status of pek and ak, we probably only have a chance in 2.
2/3 - @ portland
4/3 - vs miami
6/3 - vs washinghton
9/3 - @ denver
10/3 - vs dallas
12/3 - vs san antonio
13/3 - @ indiana
15/3 - @ houston
17/3 - vs new orleans
18/3 - @ memphis

thats a pretty brutal stretch. our only games that we should be have a chance in are washington and new orleans. even washington is playing great ball lately as they won 7 of 9 with nene in the line up before losing their last two with nene out(he is day to day and will probably be back when we play them).

as of today:
26. Memphis (38-19)

10.Toronto (23-36) -9.5
9. Detroit (23-38) -8.5
8. Minnesota (20-35) -8.5
7. Phoenix (21-39) -7
6. New Orleans(21-39) -7
5.Cleveland(20-39) -6.5
4. Sacramento (20-40) -6
3. Washington (18-39) -5.5
2. Orlando (16-43) -2.5
1. Charlotte (13-45)
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#130 » by [RCG] » Sat Mar 2, 2013 3:33 pm

Please let us slip to #4, we are so close!

Keep Kirilenko & Pek out until after the Washington game.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Murphs56
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,688
And1: 1,239
Joined: Nov 13, 2012
       

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#131 » by Murphs56 » Sat Mar 2, 2013 11:45 pm

[RCG] wrote:Please let us slip to #4, we are so close!

Keep Kirilenko & Pek out until after the Washington game.


If Washington keeps playing the way they are playing, I'm pretty sure we can finish at 3. I don't think we can overtake Orlando or Charlotte but 3 would be nice. Like I said, with Love and Bud expected to play somewhere around 15-20 games, that may really hurt our draft status
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,431
And1: 17,830
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#132 » by Klomp » Sun Mar 3, 2013 5:19 am

Through 3/2

1. Charlotte (13-45) .224
2. Orlando (16-43) .271
3. Washington (18-39) .316
4. Sacramento (20-40) .333
5. Cleveland (20-39) .339
6. Phoenix (21-39) .350
7. New Orleans (21-39) .350
8. Minnesota (20-36) .357
9. Detroit (23-38) .377
10. Toronto (23-37) .383
11. Philadelphia (23-34) .404
12. Dallas (26-32) .448
13. Portland (26-30) .464
14. Los Angeles (28-30) .483
----------
26. Memphis (38-19) .667

Sunday's Key Games
PHI @ WAS
CHA @ SAC
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
NikolaPekovic
Rookie
Posts: 1,117
And1: 344
Joined: Jun 27, 2012
 

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#133 » by NikolaPekovic » Sun Mar 3, 2013 5:31 am

Either way. I know kahn will mess it up and will overpay for some shooter with the pick.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,431
And1: 17,830
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#134 » by Klomp » Sun Mar 3, 2013 6:00 am

(Not So) Fun Fact

2011-12: Started 21-20; finished 5-20 (without Ricky Rubio)
2012-13: Started 15-14; 5-22 since (without Kevin Love)
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#135 » by [RCG] » Mon Mar 4, 2013 1:35 am

Nice wins by the Wizards and Kings!
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Murphs56
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,688
And1: 1,239
Joined: Nov 13, 2012
       

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#136 » by Murphs56 » Mon Mar 4, 2013 2:09 am

Yup game against the Heat next. We should get blown out there..Then we'll see what happens against the Wiz
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,817
And1: 1,104
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#137 » by cpfsf » Mon Mar 4, 2013 2:10 am

since we're considering every possible scenario to increase our odds, i'll add another to the mix. wish for san antonio losses. they are currently the #1 seed. they are our last opponent of the season and they may rest their starters if the outcome of the game does not affect their seed.
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#138 » by [RCG] » Mon Mar 4, 2013 2:36 am

cpfsf wrote:since we're considering every possible scenario to increase our odds, i'll add another to the mix. wish for san antonio losses. they are currently the #1 seed. they are our last opponent of the season and they may rest their starters if the outcome of the game does not affect their seed.


Well Tony Parker is out for awhile so that is a solid possibility.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,431
And1: 17,830
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#139 » by Klomp » Mon Mar 4, 2013 2:38 am

cpfsf wrote:since we're considering every possible scenario to increase our odds, i'll add another to the mix. wish for san antonio losses. they are currently the #1 seed. they are our last opponent of the season and they may rest their starters if the outcome of the game does not affect their seed.

I think they'll rest their starters no matter what anyways. It's the San Antonio way.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Murphs56
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,688
And1: 1,239
Joined: Nov 13, 2012
       

Re: Pick Watch 2013 

Post#140 » by Murphs56 » Mon Mar 4, 2013 3:31 am

The Spurs bench would beat our starters. At least without Love and Bud

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves