yardbarker

MIN - OKC (Pekovic)

Moderators: Klomp, C.lupus, Basti

Post#16 Re: MIN - OKC (Pekovic)
Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:51 pm by Krapinsky

Wolf_Cry wrote:If OKC had Pek vs. Miami...who the heck does MIami have that could stop Pek down low? Skinny self proclaim HOF Chris Bosh? The only reason OKC doesn't do this trade is if Pek wants the max. Would I do it as a Wolves fan? Not sure. I don't think Lamb is as promising as people think. He is young, that's true, but to think he can't contribute even the slightest right now makes me wonder if he is all that he's hyped to be.


You act like Pek is Shaquille O'neal. He averages 15 points per game on a 18 win team that doesn't have it's starting PF.
Image
Sig by C.lupus
Krapinsky
RealGM
User avatar
Posts: 18,372
And1: 754
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Top

Post#17 Re: MIN - OKC (Pekovic)
Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:08 pm by Wolf_Cry

Krapinsky wrote:
Wolf_Cry wrote:If OKC had Pek vs. Miami...who the heck does MIami have that could stop Pek down low? Skinny self proclaim HOF Chris Bosh? The only reason OKC doesn't do this trade is if Pek wants the max. Would I do it as a Wolves fan? Not sure. I don't think Lamb is as promising as people think. He is young, that's true, but to think he can't contribute even the slightest right now makes me wonder if he is all that he's hyped to be.


You act like Pek is Shaquille O'neal. He averages 15 points per game on a 18 win team that doesn't have it's starting PF.


Yeah, but he's also played without Love and Rubio most of the season. Defenses have concentrated on stopping him. Don't forget Rubio isn't 100% yet either. I think he would give Miami serious fits because they have no interior defense.
Wolf_Cry
Sixth Man
User avatar
Posts: 1,739
And1: 740
Joined: Jan 30, 2013
Top

Post#18 Re: MIN - OKC (Pekovic)
Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:34 pm by eyeteeth

This is a horrible trade. Basically Lamb+pick for Pek. I'd have to find something hard enough to bang my head against until I couldn't remember what basketball is anymore.
Image
@eatyerbroccoli
eyeteeth
Sixth Man
User avatar
Posts: 1,967
And1: 84
Joined: Jul 17, 2010
Location: St. Paul
Top

Post#19 Re: MIN - OKC (Pekovic)
Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:39 pm by C.lupus

The J Rocka wrote:I don't see us going in that direction. That trade tells Love that we're bringing in some younger guys that will need 2-4 years to fully develop. RA wouldn't be happy either.

I'm guessing we'll want to bring in a player that can make an immediate impact.

I think the Sixers (Wright), Jazz (Bell), or Celtics (Lee) would be good 3rd team candidates.

I agree. The Wolves have to be in win now mode (or at least win next year when healthy mode). This strikes me as a rebuild trade. You do this and you can say goodbye to Love and probably Adelman. And how long do you think Ricky will be happy losing 60% of his games?

I'm not saying Pek is God's gift to centers or that they will even keep him. But I think any trade will bring back a player that can step into a starter's role on a winning team.
Image
C.lupus


Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
User avatar
Posts: 24,993
And1: 4,179
Joined: Nov 2, 2007
Location: Nobody knows where you are, how near or how far.
Top

Post#20 Re: MIN - OKC (Pekovic)
Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:19 pm by shrink

Interesting to hear the rumor about OKC and Gortat right now, so I thought this thread was timely.

I would also point out one other thing, that I don't think gets enough notice in this trade:

I think we win this deal on trade value, but it does not necessarily mean we have to rebuild. With extra trade value, you can trade for better win-now talent than Pek could bring on his own.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 34,164
And1: 280
Joined: Sep 25, 2005
Top


Return to Minnesota Timberwolves


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users