ImageImageImage

MIN - OKC (Pekovic)

Moderators: C.lupus, Klomp, Worm Guts

User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 18,652
And1: 826
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: MIN - OKC (Pekovic) 

Post#16 » by Krapinsky » Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:51 pm

Wolf_Cry wrote:If OKC had Pek vs. Miami...who the heck does MIami have that could stop Pek down low? Skinny self proclaim HOF Chris Bosh? The only reason OKC doesn't do this trade is if Pek wants the max. Would I do it as a Wolves fan? Not sure. I don't think Lamb is as promising as people think. He is young, that's true, but to think he can't contribute even the slightest right now makes me wonder if he is all that he's hyped to be.


You act like Pek is Shaquille O'neal. He averages 15 points per game on a 18 win team that doesn't have it's starting PF.
Image
Sig by C.lupus
User avatar
Wolf_Cry
Starter
Posts: 2,497
And1: 1,185
Joined: Jan 30, 2013

Re: MIN - OKC (Pekovic) 

Post#17 » by Wolf_Cry » Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:08 pm

Krapinsky wrote:
Wolf_Cry wrote:If OKC had Pek vs. Miami...who the heck does MIami have that could stop Pek down low? Skinny self proclaim HOF Chris Bosh? The only reason OKC doesn't do this trade is if Pek wants the max. Would I do it as a Wolves fan? Not sure. I don't think Lamb is as promising as people think. He is young, that's true, but to think he can't contribute even the slightest right now makes me wonder if he is all that he's hyped to be.


You act like Pek is Shaquille O'neal. He averages 15 points per game on a 18 win team that doesn't have it's starting PF.


Yeah, but he's also played without Love and Rubio most of the season. Defenses have concentrated on stopping him. Don't forget Rubio isn't 100% yet either. I think he would give Miami serious fits because they have no interior defense.
User avatar
eyeteeth
Starter
Posts: 2,014
And1: 102
Joined: Jul 17, 2010
Location: St. Paul

Re: MIN - OKC (Pekovic) 

Post#18 » by eyeteeth » Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:34 pm

This is a horrible trade. Basically Lamb+pick for Pek. I'd have to find something hard enough to bang my head against until I couldn't remember what basketball is anymore.
Image
User avatar
C.lupus
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 26,855
And1: 5,760
Joined: Nov 02, 2007
Location: Nobody knows where you are, how near or how far.
   

Re: MIN - OKC (Pekovic) 

Post#19 » by C.lupus » Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:39 pm

The J Rocka wrote:I don't see us going in that direction. That trade tells Love that we're bringing in some younger guys that will need 2-4 years to fully develop. RA wouldn't be happy either.

I'm guessing we'll want to bring in a player that can make an immediate impact.

I think the Sixers (Wright), Jazz (Bell), or Celtics (Lee) would be good 3rd team candidates.

I agree. The Wolves have to be in win now mode (or at least win next year when healthy mode). This strikes me as a rebuild trade. You do this and you can say goodbye to Love and probably Adelman. And how long do you think Ricky will be happy losing 60% of his games?

I'm not saying Pek is God's gift to centers or that they will even keep him. But I think any trade will bring back a player that can step into a starter's role on a winning team.
Image
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 34,549
And1: 376
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: MIN - OKC (Pekovic) 

Post#20 » by shrink » Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:19 pm

Interesting to hear the rumor about OKC and Gortat right now, so I thought this thread was timely.

I would also point out one other thing, that I don't think gets enough notice in this trade:

I think we win this deal on trade value, but it does not necessarily mean we have to rebuild. With extra trade value, you can trade for better win-now talent than Pek could bring on his own.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves