yardbarker

Rondo?

Moderators: Basti, Klomp, revprodeji

ImageImageImage

Re: Rondo?

Postby Devilzsidewalk on Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:30 am

A-Zero wrote:Kevin Love and an unprotected 1st round pick for Rondo, I'd do it right now. Spend the pick on a PG and let the era of Love start in Boston :P


why not 10 unprotected picks? Dream big.
Image
User avatar
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
 
Posts: 23203
And1: 55
Joined: Oct 9, 2005
Location: حَبيبي

Re: Rondo?

Postby [RCG] on Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:01 am

A-Zero wrote:Kevin Love and an unprotected 1st round pick for Rondo, I'd do it right now. Spend the pick on a PG and let the era of Love start in Boston :P


Because Rondo makes perfect sense on a team with Rubio. :roll:
On the Wolves trading Kirilenko, Williams & Ridnour for Pau Gasol:
Cashin out wrote:I can't wait till Kupchak pulls off this trade with Minnesota,I will bring this thread back when Kuptchak rips Kaughn for all his assets.
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6232
And1: 44
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Rondo?

Postby LewisnotMiller on Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:27 am

So I was sure I was coming in here to see SOME sort of Rubio trade offer, but putting Rondo WITH Rubio is one of the more unusual thoughts I've seen in some time. No chance of that working, since they don't have complimentary skills.

The basic premise that you guys have stuff we are interested in is probably correct. Love and Pek would both be of some interest. But why you would want Rondo to put WITH Rubio is beyond me. Two of my favourite point guards, and both with the same basic flaws in their games.
User avatar
LewisnotMiller
Junior
 
Posts: 454
And1: 9
Joined: Jun 21, 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Rondo?

Postby Gideon on Mon Feb 18, 2013 6:56 am

Yeah... Rubio & Rondo would not work together at all. I really like Rondo, and I love Rubio, but just a total skill-set/need overlap.

Here's a variation:

Minny Out: Love
Minny In: Gallo, Faried

WHY for Minny: Gallo and Faried is a good return for Love... both players fit really well with our system/needs and are young with lots of potential.

Boston Out: Rondo
Boston In: Love

WHY for Boston: The Celtics are doing great with Rondo hurt... they love Bradley as a great intangibles guy, and he's probably more of a PG than a SG... so why not ship Rondo, get an elite young star, and move forward with a future core of Bradley and Love + a couple of productive seasons remaining from PP/KG

Denver Out: Gallo, Faried, Lawson
Denver In: Rondo, Thomas Robinson, James Johnson, Tyler Honeycutt (make salaries work), top 7 protected pick from Sacramento

Huge overhaul for Denver... I admit they probably won't do something this radical in the real world. However, why be satisfied with a 4-6 seat every year without being a real title threat? Rondo is an elite PG, Johnson is a quality backup who fits the Denver system well, and the Nuggets are deep enough to absorb losing a couple of starters without wrecking the team (Miller, Brewer, Chandler, and McGee are all basically starter-quality). Robinson is a promising young prospect who has shown flashes of potential and could thrive in a more harmonious setting than the clusterfk in Sacramento, and he would be Denver's PF of the future. Plus a likely late lotto pick from Sacramento within the next year or two provides another core piece.

Sac Out: Thomas Robinson, James Johnson, Tyler Honeycutt, top 7 protected pick
Sac In: Ty Lawson

The Kings/Sonics swap their recent high draft pick who hasn't been thriving in their system (plus another protected pick) for a true franchise PG. They can move forward with a Lawson/Evans/Cousins core and have some real young talent to build around.
Gideon
Junior
 
Posts: 432
And1: 17
Joined: Feb 29, 2012

Previous

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Worm Guts