ImageImageImage

Anyone glad we didn't deal DW?

Moderators: Klomp, C.lupus, Basti

Did we make the right choice keeping DW?

Yes
24
65%
No
1
3%
We're still trading him in the summer
12
32%
 
Total votes: 37

User avatar
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 13,904
And1: 624
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Location: California
 

Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#1 » by theGreatRC » Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:22 pm

He's been playing well as of late and there is no way we get value for him now since he was playing horribad to start the season and his minutes were so sporadic.

I'm personally glad we kept him, he seems different from Jonny and Wes, Derrick actually has had some huge games for us and seems to be improving instead of staying neutral.
Wolves fan that wants Kevin Love to win a ring and Wiggins winning ROY

NBA 2K15 episodes on my channel if that's your thing!
https://www.youtube.com/kubzscouts
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#2 » by [RCG] » Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:24 pm

Love me some D.Will.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
Tirion
Analyst
Posts: 3,304
And1: 125
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: made it, ma! top of the world!

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#3 » by Tirion » Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:27 pm

Dealing him now might've been too early.

Looks like he's finding his groove, need to build that trade value up.
User avatar
The J Rocka
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 13,248
And1: 1,554
Joined: Jun 26, 2009
Location: Minneapolis
   

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#4 » by The J Rocka » Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:35 pm

For now, yes. Let him start the rest of the season and move him this off-season when his value gets lifted from 6 feet under.
User avatar
PZiv
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,910
And1: 488
Joined: Apr 20, 2012
 

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#5 » by PZiv » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:05 am

What if he fully develops to what people projected he should be?
User avatar
theGreatRC
RealGM
Posts: 13,904
And1: 624
Joined: Oct 11, 2006
Location: California
 

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#6 » by theGreatRC » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:11 am

PZiv wrote:What if he fully develops to what people projected he should be?


A SF?

Then we keep him and find our two-way 2 guard and try to contend.
Wolves fan that wants Kevin Love to win a ring and Wiggins winning ROY

NBA 2K15 episodes on my channel if that's your thing!
https://www.youtube.com/kubzscouts
User avatar
PZiv
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,910
And1: 488
Joined: Apr 20, 2012
 

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#7 » by PZiv » Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:22 am

theGreatRC wrote:
PZiv wrote:What if he fully develops to what people projected he should be?


A SF?

Then we keep him and find our two-way 2 guard and try to contend.

Altho he is currently far away from SF spot now. He is improving compairing to the last season.
1.2ppg, 0.3rpg, minor stuff but compairing it with last season and going a step forward with same mpgs is progress to me, invisible but nice.
Apparently SF spot will be loaded for atleast end of the next season, so there aren't gonna be minutes for Derrick there unless Adelman decides to pull up some athletic with taste of Pek's strength frontcourt in
Derrick ----- Johnson
\ /
Pek
+ Adding Bjelica to the roster and resigning Budinger seals the spot rotation. Altho Bjelica and Gelabale would prolly cover SG spot from time to time, there won't be valuable minutes on Derrick to improve his play there, unless next 31 game he starts getting atleast 10-5mpg on that spot.
User avatar
Saltine
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,137
And1: 436
Joined: Jul 20, 2003
Location: Land o' Lakes
     

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#8 » by Saltine » Fri Feb 22, 2013 1:00 am

He's slowly getting better, and has a good attitude, no sense moving him now for a small return.
User avatar
phonzadellika
Pro Prospect
Posts: 943
And1: 119
Joined: Feb 04, 2011

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#9 » by phonzadellika » Fri Feb 22, 2013 1:21 am

If he can average 18 and 8 over the final 31 maybe we can get something decent for him in the offseason.
User avatar
Calinks
RealGM
Posts: 27,907
And1: 1,682
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#10 » by Calinks » Fri Feb 22, 2013 1:24 am

I never was too down on him and he didn't bother me like so many other fans. I have been dissapointed but that happens, alot when it comes to our draft picks. Still I am happy to have him as he has improved quite a bit on one season. Also his value will probably be a lot higher if he keeps playing like this. He def looks a hell of a lot more explosive than he did last year and if those crazy almost highlights start to actually become highlights, I think a lot of teams will be interested. We'd might even keep him if he could play SF and take over when AK leaves or declines enough to be a role player.

At this point it looks like he needs to be a PF though to enjoy any real success,
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
NikolaPekovic
Senior
Posts: 640
And1: 56
Joined: Jun 26, 2012

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#11 » by NikolaPekovic » Fri Feb 22, 2013 1:45 am

i wish we could put kevin loves mind in derrick williams body.
User avatar
Klomp
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 36,819
And1: 2,374
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
   

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#12 » by Klomp » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:16 am

NikolaPekovic wrote:i wish we could put kevin loves mind in derrick williams body.

Can he have Kevin Love's hands though?
Image
DusterBuster wrote:Klomp is like the ultimate troll mod.

Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
User avatar
Murphs56
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,475
And1: 177
Joined: Nov 13, 2012

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#13 » by Murphs56 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:37 am

Very Happy we kept him. There was nothing out there I saw worth giving him up for. Millsap didn't make any sense considering he's a FA after this year. D-Will has shown he's improving. He's not shown what made him the 2nd overall pick consistently, but there are flashes
User avatar
[RCG]
Head Coach
Posts: 7,047
And1: 135
Joined: May 24, 2010
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#14 » by [RCG] » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:42 am

If he could shoot a little more consistently from 3 and if he had a better handle of the ball on his way to the basket he'd be so good... :/
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and to remove all doubt
User avatar
Murphs56
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,475
And1: 177
Joined: Nov 13, 2012

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#15 » by Murphs56 » Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:44 am

[RCG] wrote:If he could shoot a little more consistently from 3 and if he had a better handle of the ball on his way to the basket he'd be so good... :/


I must say, his ability to finish has been a cause for concern since I can remember, BUT the last few games he's been drawing fouls and finishing against defenders. I just hope it continues
NikolaPekovic
Senior
Posts: 640
And1: 56
Joined: Jun 26, 2012

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#16 » by NikolaPekovic » Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:38 am

i wouldnt mind if we kept him until next years trade deadline.
User avatar
GopherIt!
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,556
And1: 703
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: Location: Location

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#17 » by GopherIt! » Fri Feb 22, 2013 4:40 am

glad we didn't sell the lad for 50 pence on the pound.
Monday: Bazzin'
Tuesday: Bazzerrific
Wednesday: Bazzellent
Thursday: Bazznificent
Friday: Bazztastic
Weekends: Shabbazzing
User avatar
Foye
RealGM
Posts: 17,414
And1: 831
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
     

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#18 » by Foye » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:25 am

Yes, sir.
User avatar
Basti
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 34,691
And1: 1,576
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ har en ståkukk!
 

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#19 » by Basti » Fri Feb 22, 2013 5:29 am

While I'm glad he wasn't dealt until now because it would have meant too many minutes for Dante most likely, or someone else having to fill the minutes at the four. On the other hand, either him or Love will have to be dealt sooner or later if Williams keeps improving like he has been. It's just too much value to miss out on.

Not sure whom I'd rather trade, though. There's plenty of reasons to trade Love but he's also the much better player. Either way, though, if Williams keeps improving we should be able to fill out our roster in the off-season nicely.
User avatar
Grits n Gravy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,065
And1: 390
Joined: Feb 21, 2010
Location: Aotearoa
 

Re: Anyone glad we didn't deal DW? 

Post#20 » by Grits n Gravy » Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:43 am

yeah i was very happy we kept him. he's been growing a lot lately, especially in being able to make a mid range j instead of forcing the issue on a bad drive.
Image
Zach Lavine #8

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves


Users browsing this forum: codigoman, Klomp, sheefo13