ImageImageImage

Injury Watch Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,509
And1: 17,909
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#241 » by Klomp » Mon Mar 2, 2015 6:48 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/PhilErvin/status/572467972729544704[/tweet]
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#242 » by AQuintus » Mon Mar 2, 2015 6:49 pm

Klomp wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/PhilErvin/status/572467972729544704[/tweet]


If Martin is out, hopefully that means extended minutes at SG for LaVine with Brown handling backup PG.
Image
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 11,478
And1: 3,721
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

 

Post#243 » by minimus » Wed Mar 4, 2015 2:19 pm

Guys, do you think that Pek buyout is possible? I mean DET, MIL, PHI used this option to move forward. Pek is not bad person, but it might be alternative for us. Maybe they can agree on reducing amount. Sounds crazy, but I am just wondering if it makes sense.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 26,089
And1: 10,528
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: 

Post#244 » by Worm Guts » Wed Mar 4, 2015 2:22 pm

minimus wrote:Guys, do you think that Pek buyout is possible? I mean DET, MIL, PHI used this option to move forward. Pek is not bad person, but it might be alternative for us. Maybe they can agree on reducing amount. Sounds crazy, but I am just wondering if it makes sense.


There's no reason to. You pay the same amount and it still counts against the salary cap. And the thing is that Pek is still useful to this team when he plays, he's still our best center.
User avatar
Sothron
Head Coach
Posts: 6,216
And1: 3,262
Joined: Oct 27, 2001
       

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#245 » by Sothron » Wed Mar 4, 2015 4:25 pm

I don't want to buy Pek out. I want to trade him for whatever we can get.
Merc_Porto
General Manager
Posts: 9,936
And1: 3,529
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

Re: Re: Re: 

Post#246 » by Merc_Porto » Wed Mar 4, 2015 6:34 pm

Worm Guts wrote: You pay the same amount and it still counts against the salary cap.


I didn't know that.
Is this really true ?

(The part of still counting for the salary cap)
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 26,089
And1: 10,528
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Re: Re: 

Post#247 » by Worm Guts » Wed Mar 4, 2015 6:38 pm

mercgold3 wrote:
Worm Guts wrote: You pay the same amount and it still counts against the salary cap.


I didn't know that.
Is this really true ?

(The part of still counting for the salary cap)


It's true. If you buy him out, it still counts against the cap. I think there's something called the stretch provision where you can pay a smaller amount over a longer period of time, but I'm not sure about that.
Feilong
Veteran
Posts: 2,872
And1: 1,029
Joined: Jan 26, 2014

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#248 » by Feilong » Wed Mar 4, 2015 6:49 pm

When you buyout someone you pay him after an agreement a portion of the guaranteed money left in his contract.
This way team saves money, if e.g both parties agree to 80% of the total amount. Then he becomes free agent.
But 100% of his contract still counts towards salary cap.
What you can do is use the stretch provision. e.g. if player has 2 more years of 10M/Y, you can stretch to count on your salary cap 4 years of 5M each year.
Merc_Porto
General Manager
Posts: 9,936
And1: 3,529
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

 

Post#249 » by Merc_Porto » Wed Mar 4, 2015 6:53 pm

Got it.

Thanks Feilong and Worm Guts ;)
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 26,089
And1: 10,528
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#250 » by Worm Guts » Wed Mar 4, 2015 6:54 pm

The team only pays less if the player agrees to take less, which they usually don't. The only reason they would is if they can make it up through free agency.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,509
And1: 17,909
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#251 » by Klomp » Wed Mar 4, 2015 6:55 pm

The stretch provision doesn't really make sense for Pekovic, IMO.

He's owed 35.8m over the final three years of his deal. Using the stretch provision would keep him on the books at roughly $5.1m per year through the 2021-22 season (twice the number of years remaining on his contract, plus one).
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Feilong
Veteran
Posts: 2,872
And1: 1,029
Joined: Jan 26, 2014

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#252 » by Feilong » Wed Mar 4, 2015 7:07 pm

Worm Guts wrote:The team only pays less if the player agrees to take less, which they usually don't. The only reason they would is if they can make it up through free agency.


As far as i know it is the opposite.
Almost always players agree to take less.
This way, team saves money, otherwise they lose a player for only a roster spot. And on the other hand player becomes a free agent so he can sign for a playoff team or escape a bad situation.

e.g.
Milwaukee Bucks forward Larry Sanders has walked away from basketball after five years in the league, agreeing to a buy-out with the team after the trade deadline.

Sanders had three years remaining on a US$44-million contract. He left around $21 million on the table in the buyout.
Merc_Porto
General Manager
Posts: 9,936
And1: 3,529
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#253 » by Merc_Porto » Wed Mar 4, 2015 7:10 pm

Klomp wrote:The stretch provision doesn't really make sense for Pekovic, IMO.

He's owed 35.8m over the final three years of his deal. Using the stretch provision would keep him on the books at roughly $5.1m per year through the 2021-22 season (twice the number of years remaining on his contract, plus one).


Agree, doesn´t make sense to buyout Pek then.

If there is no alternative (Trade)
The thing is. We really need to put Pekovic on limited minutes then. (12-18)
I know it´s dificult to understand because we are paying big buckets to the guy. But...

He is with major problems with his ankles. This is the true.
Doesnt make sense Pekovic play +25 minutes per game. (We already know its too much)
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 26,089
And1: 10,528
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#254 » by Worm Guts » Wed Mar 4, 2015 7:11 pm

Feilong wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:The team only pays less if the player agrees to take less, which they usually don't. The only reason they would is if they can make it up through free agency.


As far as i know it is the opposite.
Almost always players agree to take less.
This way, team saves money, otherwise they lose a player for only a roster spot. And on the other hand player becomes a free agent so he can sign for a playoff team or escape a bad situation.

e.g.
Milwaukee Bucks forward Larry Sanders has walked away from basketball after five years in the league, agreeing to a buy-out with the team after the trade deadline.

Sanders had three years remaining on a US$44-million contract. He left around $21 million on the table in the buyout.



It depends on the situation I guess, whether the player wants out more or the team wants him gone more. Josh Smith didn't give up anything.
Feilong
Veteran
Posts: 2,872
And1: 1,029
Joined: Jan 26, 2014

Re: 

Post#255 » by Feilong » Wed Mar 4, 2015 7:17 pm

mercgold3 wrote:Got it.

Thanks Feilong and Worm Guts ;)


Read this
http://www.basketballinsiders.com/nba-a ... a-players/
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,509
And1: 17,909
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#256 » by Klomp » Wed Mar 4, 2015 7:18 pm

Feilong wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:The team only pays less if the player agrees to take less, which they usually don't. The only reason they would is if they can make it up through free agency.


As far as i know it is the opposite.
Almost always players agree to take less.
This way, team saves money, otherwise they lose a player for only a roster spot. And on the other hand player becomes a free agent so he can sign for a playoff team or escape a bad situation.

e.g.
Milwaukee Bucks forward Larry Sanders has walked away from basketball after five years in the league, agreeing to a buy-out with the team after the trade deadline.

Sanders had three years remaining on a US$44-million contract. He left around $21 million on the table in the buyout.

I would think Larry Sanders is pretty far from the norm.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,509
And1: 17,909
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#257 » by Klomp » Wed Mar 4, 2015 11:47 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/Twolves_PR/status/573268276718936064[/tweet]
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,811
And1: 8,832
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#258 » by C.lupus » Fri Mar 6, 2015 6:56 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/DarrenWolfson/status/573918466782048256[/tweet]

This team... :nonono:
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,811
And1: 8,832
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#259 » by C.lupus » Sat Mar 7, 2015 12:28 am

[tweet]https://twitter.com/thedailywolf/status/573968241435017216[/tweet]
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,509
And1: 17,909
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Injury Watch Thread 

Post#260 » by Klomp » Tue Mar 17, 2015 6:41 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/DarrenWolfson/status/577902235272617984[/tweet]
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves