Blazers vs Wolves 9PM EST

Post #41 » by **Calinks** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:02 am

You kidding Prince!?

ZellJr · Post #42 » by **ZellJr** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:03 am

this is unwatchable

Post #43 » by **Calinks** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:03 am

Look at this cheese! The Blazers were only going for threes on that play. They knew that's how to kill us, they just kept passing it until they got a look didn't even try a two.

LordBaldric · Post #44 » by **LordBaldric** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:04 am

Self destruct sequence: Activated

Murphs56 · Post #45 » by **Murphs56** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:05 am

Mitchell's lineup choices get stranger as the year goes on

Merc_Porto · Post #46 » by **Merc_Porto** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:06 am

1-8 from three and Rudez doesn't play.

m2002brian · Post #47 » by **m2002brian** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:08 am

That's right Zack, let's just start jacking contested threes early in the clock. Good basketball.

ZellJr · Post #48 » by **ZellJr** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:09 am

m2002brian wrote:That's right Zack, let's just start jacking contested threes early in the clock. Good basketball.

If Zach doesnt do it, wiggins will

m2002brian · Post #49 » by **m2002brian** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:10 am

ZellJr wrote:
m2002brian wrote:That's right Zack, let's just start jacking contested threes early in the clock. Good basketball.

If Zach doesnt do it, wiggins will

Oh,well then, that makes it okay.

NewWolvesOrder · Post #50 » by **NewWolvesOrder** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:12 am

Attention Turd Wiggins! Give the ball to Mr. Towns!!!

Post #51 » by **Calinks** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:12 am

Portland has collapsed and rebuilt their franchise now 3 times since we started our initial rebuild. :lol:

Also LOL at people that were swearing up and down we would be better than them. Even in their shattered state they still are the better squad than we are right now.

m2002brian · Post #52 » by **m2002brian** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:15 am

See that, R2 can hit shots in the fourth

Post #53 » by **Klomp** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:16 am

Calinks wrote:Also LOL at people that were swearing up and down we would be better than them. Even in their shattered state they still are the better squad than we are right now.

Half their roster is in their prime. It shouldn't be a surprise.

m2002brian · Post #54 » by **m2002brian** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:19 am

Now that is a well worked three, Zack

Rubio Inc · Post #55 » by **Rubio Inc** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:21 am

Spoiler:

Well, at least we'll have this kid alongisde KAT next year.

Oh, and a REAL coach will also be good.

Post #56 » by **Calinks** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:21 am

Klomp wrote:
Calinks wrote:Also LOL at people that were swearing up and down we would be better than them. Even in their shattered state they still are the better squad than we are right now.

Half their roster is in their prime. It shouldn't be a surprise.

Just saying I love how people saw these teams were losing player and just assumed we would leap frog them. Blazers, Kings, Clippers, etc.

m2002brian · Post #57 » by **m2002brian** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:25 am

R2 with 7 in the 4th

Post #58 » by **Calinks** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:26 am

Another close game we could have won if we could hit 3 point shots.

Merc_Porto · Post #59 » by **Merc_Porto** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:26 am

Klomp wrote:
Calinks wrote:Also LOL at people that were swearing up and down we would be better than them. Even in their shattered state they still are the better squad than we are right now.

Half their roster is in their prime. It shouldn't be a surprise.

Yeah.
Role players in their prime (except Lillard). I wish we could switch coaches too see the real difference.

Merc_Porto · Post #60 » by **Merc_Porto** » Mon Feb 1, 2016 4:30 am

We don't have many 3pt shooters out there and yet we play Prince 30 minutes and Rudez 0. That is just brilliant coaching.