ImageImageImage

Kevin Love 6'7.75" Without Shoes

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
TheFranchise21
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,518
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 14, 2001
Location: All Day
Contact:

Kevin Love 6'7.75" Without Shoes 

Post#1 » by TheFranchise21 » Mon Jun 2, 2008 4:27 pm

http://www.nbadraft.net/2008nbapredraftcamp005.asp

Not official so don't shoot the messenger.

Assuming the info is true, he's 6'9-6'9.5 in shoes.

Where does that put him on people's draft boards?

1. Rose
2a. Mayo
2b. Beasley
3. Lopez
4. Randolph
5. Gallinari
6. Love

There's still 6 guys ahead of Love on my draft board. If Gallinari workouts prove that he has below-average to average athleticism, I might move Love ahead of him.
User avatar
D1SGRUNTL3D
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,104
And1: 2,080
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Location: Minnesota
   

 

Post#2 » by D1SGRUNTL3D » Mon Jun 2, 2008 4:30 pm

Cant be good for your stock if youre a love guy.

I never was to begin with..no matter where we were pickin in the top 5
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

 

Post#3 » by horaceworthy » Mon Jun 2, 2008 4:59 pm

How can it not be good for his stock?

He was expected to measure out at around 6'9" in shoes, and coming in at 6'8.25" means that he'll be at least that (shoes typically add 1"-1.75" in height, and since the NBA rounds up, if they add 1.25"+, Love will be listed at 6'10"). What will help/hurt his stock more is his wingspan/standing reach.

It isn't like a 6'8.25" measurement from a non-elite athlete means he'll have a cruddy career. Al Jefferson measured at 6'8.25" without shoes, and he seems to have turned out okay.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
Winter Wonder
Rookie
Posts: 1,198
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2008
       

 

Post#4 » by Winter Wonder » Mon Jun 2, 2008 5:01 pm

That definitely should hurt his stock dependent upon his wingspan and hand size (both I thought I heard were not great).

1. Rose
2. Mayo
3. Beasley
4. Lopez
5. Gallinari
6. Randolph
7. Bayless
8. Jordan
9. Love?
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 31,919
And1: 5,943
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

 

Post#5 » by Devilzsidewalk » Mon Jun 2, 2008 5:11 pm

doesn't change at all for me, exactly as tall as expected

he's got such a great attitude too

http://www.draftexpress.com/article/Int ... olph-2908/


Reporter: Do you know Kevin McHale? Have you ever talked to him?

Kevin Love: I feel like I know him just from watching the old school tapes back in the day. All the up and unders, all the step backs and the hook throughs. I mean all of those guys, Bird, Parrish, Johnson and Danny Ainge; Landon Ainge played on my high school team. I watched all of those guys, but definitely Kevin McHale was my favorite growing up.

Reporter: Have you scheduled a workout with Minnesota?

Kevin Love: I think it
Winter Wonder
Rookie
Posts: 1,198
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2008
       

 

Post#6 » by Winter Wonder » Mon Jun 2, 2008 6:04 pm

All right, that's it. I want them all. I mean, I know I think I have my favorites; but they all sound very good right now. They are all pretty much selling themselves. Let's just trade most of the rest of our team for multiple lotto picks. This way we can get all the players we like.
TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,362
And1: 1,015
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

 

Post#7 » by TheProdigy » Mon Jun 2, 2008 6:21 pm

6' 8.25 = 6'9 to 6'10 with shoes. That's tall enough to play power forward. He's about the same size as Big Al right now.

It's sounding more and more like Love will be our pick. In interviews lately he's really been sucking up to McHale and embracing Minneapolis/cold weather. He really sounds like the type of guy McHale would fall in love with. He's a true student of the game.

I'm basically preparing myself for Love being our draft pick. The more I think about it, the more I like it. Sure he'll be a liability on defense. On offense though, having two dynamic low post scorers will be near impossible to stop. Try doubling them and then you have to deal with Foye and McCants knocking down threes. Both of them shot over 40% from 3 last year.

Mayo is still the guy I like, but if it's not him I'll be happy with Kevin Love.
User avatar
TrentTuckerForever
Starter
Posts: 2,100
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 23, 2001
Location: St. Paul

 

Post#8 » by TrentTuckerForever » Mon Jun 2, 2008 7:10 pm

DaKidKG wrote:6' 8.25 = 6'9 to 6'10 with shoes. That's tall enough to play power forward. He's about the same size as Big Al right now.


But the Wolves need a center because Big Al is too small! (among other reasons.) I like Love too, but if that's McHale's plan he'd better be trading down. Mayo, Bayless, Randolph... all are more highly rated. You can get better value for the #3.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 31,919
And1: 5,943
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

 

Post#9 » by Devilzsidewalk » Mon Jun 2, 2008 7:24 pm

what makes Randolph more highly rated? I'd be kinda pissed if they took Randolph. Or Bayless for that matter.
Image
User avatar
PeeDee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,886
And1: 66
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

 

Post#10 » by PeeDee » Mon Jun 2, 2008 7:34 pm

Who are the teams we could trade down to?

Some people think Memphis will take Love, so they'd be a the lowest we could go... and outside of Rudy Gay, none of their other pieces do much for me.

And there's no way we could pry him away in a pick swap.
User avatar
TrentTuckerForever
Starter
Posts: 2,100
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 23, 2001
Location: St. Paul

 

Post#11 » by TrentTuckerForever » Mon Jun 2, 2008 7:40 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:what makes Randolph more highly rated? I'd be kinda pissed if they took Randolph. Or Bayless for that matter.


More highly rated by other teams - NY would kill for Mayo, the Grizzlies like Lopez, etc. The Wolves may think that Love is the guy, but if other teams like different guys it's stupid to take Love so high.
User avatar
TrentTuckerForever
Starter
Posts: 2,100
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 23, 2001
Location: St. Paul

 

Post#12 » by TrentTuckerForever » Mon Jun 2, 2008 7:58 pm

PeeDee wrote:Who are the teams we could trade down to?

Some people think Memphis will take Love, so they'd be a the lowest we could go... and outside of Rudy Gay, none of their other pieces do much for me.

And there's no way we could pry him away in a pick swap.


Knicks or Clippers, either of which would covet Mayo's star power and talent. If Memphis takes Love, the Wolves would still be left with Lopez, who some think should be their pick at 3 anyway.
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,811
And1: 8,832
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

 

Post#13 » by C.lupus » Mon Jun 2, 2008 8:10 pm

We already have a bunch of undersized guards, might as well have undersized centers, too. Maybe we can trade Brewer for someone shorter at the SF position, also. :roll:
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 31,919
And1: 5,943
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

 

Post#14 » by Devilzsidewalk » Mon Jun 2, 2008 8:23 pm

you know who else was an undersized center?

BILL RUSSELL!!!!!111!!!!11!!

*swish*
SendEm
Banned User
Posts: 2,285
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 13, 2007

 

Post#15 » by SendEm » Mon Jun 2, 2008 8:36 pm

Kevin Love = Glen "Big Baby" Davis circa 2005-2006
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 31,919
And1: 5,943
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

 

Post#16 » by Devilzsidewalk » Mon Jun 2, 2008 8:42 pm

SendEm wrote:Kevin Love = Glen "Big Baby" Davis circa 2005-2006


hope not
TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,362
And1: 1,015
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

 

Post#17 » by TheProdigy » Mon Jun 2, 2008 8:43 pm

SendEm = Failure
Pistol Pete Vescey
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,347
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 13, 2001

 

Post#18 » by Pistol Pete Vescey » Mon Jun 2, 2008 9:05 pm

does anyone feel brewer can play the 2?

PG: foye
SG: brewer
SF: gomes
PF: love
C: jefferson

to my mind, that is a very interesting lineup; probably the biggest in the NBA but still extremely mobile.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 31,919
And1: 5,943
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

 

Post#19 » by Devilzsidewalk » Mon Jun 2, 2008 9:11 pm

defensively Brewer would be fine at SG I think, but I think you need a stout offensive threat at SF then. Like Beasley.
Image
User avatar
Tor
Freshman
Posts: 55
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 21, 2008
Location: Minnesota

 

Post#20 » by Tor » Mon Jun 2, 2008 9:12 pm

I actually thought he was going to be shorter, so this kind of improves his stock as far as I'm concerned. If he's 6'8 1/4 without shoes, that should mean he'll end up at about 6'9 or 6'8 3/4 with shoes on, which isn't too terribly bad for a PF. It all depends on his wingspan now.

Tier 1:

1) Beasley
2) Mayo
3) Rose

(You can call me crazy or whatever you want, but I think Mayo has more superstar potential than Rose. I wouldn't even be surprised if Mayo ends up being hands down the best player to come out of this draft class)

Tier 2

1) Gallinari
2) Randolph
3) Lopez
4) Bayless

Tier 3

1) Love
2) Gordon

Tier 4:

1) Jordan
2) Westbrook
3) Augustin
4) Speights
5) Rush
6) Alexander (need a little more consistency on the jumper before I put him ahead of Rush)

Tier 5:[/b]

1) Arthur
2) Budinger
3) Greene
4) McGee
5) R. Lopez
6) Koufos
Image

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves