ImageImageImage

Jefferson vs. Okafor

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,481
And1: 17,884
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#1 » by Klomp » Tue Jul 29, 2008 5:10 pm

Emeka Okafor Just agreed to a 6 year deal worth 72 million dollars. This is for a guy who averaged 14/11

Remember that last offseason, Jefferson signed a 5 year extension worth 65 million. After the season Al just had averaging 21/11, its clearly a bargain that we were able to lock him up last year.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#2 » by 4ho5ive » Tue Jul 29, 2008 5:18 pm

I like Okafor. But I like him as a compliment to Al Jefferson. Bogut and Okafor just got paid bank to average bare minimum double-double's. I think Okafor is gonna stay along the 14/11 line, I dont see him getting much better. Bogut will probably get better.

Bynum is gonna demand at least 65+ when it comes time to negotiate.

I heart you Al Jefferson.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,481
And1: 17,884
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#3 » by Klomp » Tue Jul 29, 2008 5:25 pm

The only part where I prefer Okafor over Jefferson is defense, something that doesn't appear in a stat sheet.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 48,464
And1: 14,316
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#4 » by Calinks » Tue Jul 29, 2008 5:46 pm

Okafor is a really good and may be great. If he can stay injury free he could be a top bigman. Defensively he trumps Big Al's skills. Offensively, well I don't know if there are more than a small handful of PF's today that have the skills of Big Al. We certainly got a tremendous steal.

The Lakers will be paying Barnum BIGTIME money. With his exposure, youth, the recent bibman contracts, and the Lakers inability to win a title without him, his agent will have a lot of leverage to get a major deal done.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,631
And1: 960
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#5 » by funkatron101 » Tue Jul 29, 2008 6:13 pm

Okafor has hit his ceiling to me. I think stat wise his rookie year was the best.

We got an absolute deal for Al. I love his attitude!
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
User avatar
Foye
Club Captain- German Soccer
Posts: 24,830
And1: 3,457
Joined: Jul 29, 2008
Location: Frankfurt
 

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#6 » by Foye » Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:23 pm

I don't get why everybody is so high on Okafor, comeone he is a good PF/C but NOT worth 72 mio $ for 6 years. He has good defense, but thats pretty much the only thing he has. Compare him to Dwight Howard the #1 in Draft before nr. #2 Okafor. Howard is getting better every year while Okafor certainly isn't. Howard was able to lead his team to the playoffs Okafor couldnt bring the Cats even near.
This guy is sure not worth the 72 mio. $

He is a good nba player, but thats all and i don't think you should give that much money to a player who will probably never be a superstar IMO.
User avatar
prefuse73
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,572
And1: 44
Joined: Feb 15, 2006
Location: W1T1SG
         

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#7 » by prefuse73 » Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:31 pm

Defense is all about attitude and effort...I don't think Al has come close to hitting his ceiling defensively. He will put in the effort and he said he was focusing on defense over the summer.

I would rather have Al's offensive prowess and the ability to get better defensively than having a good defensive player who will never be able to do what Al does.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#8 » by deeney0 » Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:56 pm

Just helps put in perspective how much the Bucks really overpaid Bogut. Okafor is the better player hands down imo.
User avatar
TheFranchise21
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,518
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 14, 2001
Location: All Day
Contact:

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#9 » by TheFranchise21 » Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:04 am

I think a Bucks poster said Boguts deal has incentives that can let him earn up to that number that was reported as the amount he signed for.
My Kobe Bryant website I designed myself: http://personal.stthomas.edu/dnnguyen/kb24.
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#10 » by 4ho5ive » Wed Jul 30, 2008 1:10 am

I think like the Biedrins deal tho, the incentives are very basic and easily attainable. At least IIRC.
User avatar
NO-KG-AI
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 43,006
And1: 18,072
Joined: Jul 19, 2005
Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#11 » by NO-KG-AI » Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:58 am

Okafor doesn't have to get better for his stats to shoot up, watch Larry Brown use him correctly and his scoring averages shoot up, and everyone will note his "improvement"

Okafor is on a good price tag IMO, and Jefferson is just a flat out steal.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
Tirion
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,752
And1: 290
Joined: Oct 27, 2005

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#12 » by Tirion » Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:03 am

klomp44 wrote:Emeka Okafor Just agreed to a 6 year deal worth 72 million dollars. This is for a guy who averaged 14/11

Remember that last offseason, Jefferson signed a 5 year extension worth 65 million. After the season Al just had averaging 21/11, its clearly a bargain that we were able to lock him up last year.

ummm... 65 million in 5 years is 13 millon per year, 72 million in 6 years is 12 millon per year. Bil Al actually makes more money per year than Okafor will. Where is that bargain, you're talking about? Each guy got what he deserved, Jefferson is a far better player on offense, so he gets paid more, but Meka earns his paycheck on defensive side anyway.
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#13 » by Vindicater » Fri Aug 1, 2008 1:51 am

I know, Jeffersons deal is very similar to okafors.

I think both teams are happy
JMillott
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 07, 2008

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#14 » by JMillott » Sat Aug 2, 2008 4:20 am

I love Al Jefferson maybe my favorite NBA player besides Paul Pierce, that being said his defense needs to improve more then Okafor's offense needs to improve in order to help a team reach the top of the mountain.

Emeka Okafor is pretty close to being a Ben Wallace lite type defender and rebounder, in fact I believe that is exactly what he will become under Larry Brown but he'll also end up becoming a 16-18 PPG scorer while not needing a lot of touches.

A guy like Okafor as he heads into his prime on a Larry Brown coached team is enough to get the Bobcats keeping teams in the mid to low 90's in scoring. That is a huge step towards becoming a meaningful team in this league.

I think that Al Jefferson, Kevin Love, Randy Foye, Mike Miller, Ryan Gomes and Corey Brewer is a much better core of talent then the Bobcats have in my opinion but I think Randy Wittman is an awful basketball coach.

I think i'll feel a lot better about Al Jefferson and companies future once the Wolves get a real coach on board.
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#15 » by Vindicater » Sat Aug 2, 2008 5:40 am

The wolves have a much better future then bobcats
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."
JMillott
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 07, 2008

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#16 » by JMillott » Sat Aug 2, 2008 5:51 am

Vindicater wrote:The wolves have a much better future then bobcats


I agree with that but I believe that Randy Wittman needs to go before they will be able to turn it around. In the Bobcats case they have under-achieved at least last season because they had the worst coach in the NBA last season and they now have one of the best basketball coaches and teachers this sport has ever had.

Yes, Larry Brown burns his way out of town at every stop but save for an insane owner taking Isiah Thomas's side over Larry Brown's which is beyond laughable and enjoyable as a Celtics fan to see the Knicks suck he has left every team in better shape then they were in when he got there.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,782
And1: 1,020
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#17 » by Dewey » Sat Aug 2, 2008 1:07 pm

Just think if we had both players ... which makes me cringe at the r-signing of Craig Smith.

We "needed" an athletic/ defensive big and added an under-sized forward at 6'8". Sure it's easy to say we should've gotten a real big man, but IMO iwe should have just done nothing or moved Smith in a sign and trade. We have an under-sized forward (Maddog) already.

I agree that Jefferson has good upside defensively and will gradually improve - not worried. I am worried about the overall production of our big men as a whole. We need to hope Collins exceeds ourexpectations as a "solid" role player, and Love can compete (not be good, just compete) defensively. I do think Love is more athletic than he's perceived, but I still foresee some foul trouble ahead.

Team defense will be "critical" for the Wolves, because we are not good one-on-one defenders. Pryzbilla may even be a viable option as we look to add height/shot-blocking.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
JMillott
Pro Prospect
Posts: 963
And1: 32
Joined: Apr 07, 2008

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#18 » by JMillott » Sat Aug 2, 2008 2:29 pm

The Wolves should be much better on defense then most people expect, in my opinion. I believe that people are have really under-valued Kevin Love's defensive impact for this team.

The up grade in rebounding alone from adding a second legit NBA starting big man alone is going to change things quite a bit. As well as the added impact of having better offensive players like Foye, Love and Miller should make it much easier to hide Corey Brewer's offense on the floor so that they can get his defense on the floor.

The key to improving the defense is really just a matter of limiting the playing time of Telfair, McCants and Smith.
User avatar
Vindicater
General Manager
Posts: 7,948
And1: 423
Joined: Apr 11, 2004

Re: Jefferson vs. Okafor 

Post#19 » by Vindicater » Sun Aug 3, 2008 1:59 am

I dont have a problem with resigning smith, he was cheap and knows the game plan. There was not many viable options out there.

Brian Skinner would have been an interesting guy to look at, but hes now gone to LA.
"That's why the last two years weren't guaranteed," Walsh said. "Either way, he knew it could have happened either way."

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves