Craig Smith for Crittendon or Lowry
WHY FOR MEM: With the Zach Randolph deal nixed, Memphis may be anxious to bide its time, and see what they have in Darrell Arthur. There are rumors that the Grizz have soured on Hakim Warrick as well.
Craig Smith remarkable quickness helps him provide offense down low to the three young centers. Smith needs size behind him though on defense, and MEM has three legit 7-footers in Darko, Haddadi and Marc Gasol. The Grizz would like Smith's youth, hustle, andc haracter, and his contract is small and short ($2.5 mil, $2.7 mil). Smith is actually a tiny BYC, so the fact that MEM is under the salary cap makes that a nice fit too.
WHY FOR MIN: Like Gomes, I love this guy's attitude, but we simply don't have the help defender to put behind Smith that he needs. I don't think he pairs with either Al or Kevin Love, and I'd have serious concerns trotting him out there with Jason Collins.
I remain concerned that an injury at PG would simply ruin us, with only Telfair and Foye available to play the position. There are still whispers outside MIN that Foye will never be a PG. This could be an attractive place for one of MEM's PG's to try to make good, especially with the addition of Mayo.
Its a small win for salary. Not only do we save $1.1-$1.3 mil right away, neither of the PG's salaries are guaranteed for 2009.
Personally, I prefer Crittendon, but I can understand why others may like Lowry better.
MIN-MEM
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: MIN-MEM
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,631
- And1: 960
- Joined: Jan 02, 2008
- Location: St. Paul
Re: MIN-MEM
I would.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
Re: MIN-MEM
- Foye
- Club Captain- German Soccer
- Posts: 24,828
- And1: 3,456
- Joined: Jul 29, 2008
- Location: Frankfurt
Re: MIN-MEM
Me, too. Smith won't have to much playing time so we could use him to get another young guard...
Re: MIN-MEM
- Howler21
- Senior
- Posts: 577
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 03, 2008
- Location: OKC
Re: MIN-MEM
Even with the logjam at the 4 spot I would pass on the deal.
Re: MIN-MEM
- Howler21
- Senior
- Posts: 577
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 03, 2008
- Location: OKC
Re: MIN-MEM
On second thought, I would be up for Critt
Re: MIN-MEM
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,919
- And1: 5,943
- Joined: Oct 09, 2005
Re: MIN-MEM
there isn't anymore time available at guard than in the frontcourt - Foye, Telfair, Brewer, Carney, McCants, Miller
that pretty much covers all the minutes at PG and SG
that pretty much covers all the minutes at PG and SG
Re: MIN-MEM
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 55,098
- And1: 14,427
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: MIN-MEM
Devilzsidewalk wrote:there isn't anymore time available at guard than in the frontcourt - Foye, Telfair, Brewer, Carney, McCants, Miller
that pretty much covers all the minutes at PG and SG
I agree we have SG fully covered, but we only have two players that are even capable of playing PG. I think if one goes down, we're sunk -- the other can't play 48 minutes.
Re: MIN-MEM
- southern wolf
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,854
- And1: 2,163
- Joined: Aug 02, 2008
- Location: Australia
Re: MIN-MEM
I would do it, we've got too many players similar to the rhino and we'd have three talented young pg's to develop.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves