horaceworthy wrote:I like the gamble. If he gets his head on semi-straight, we've got a Brendan Haywood type on our hands. If he doesn't work out, it's no skin off our backs. It makes up for not getting to roll the dice on Livingston.
It's scary, the Wolves are actually starting to resemble a well run organization, using their wide open roster to take looks at guys like Carney and Harrison. I know it's the same people in the front office, but now that the pressure to win with KG is off their backs, they're running the organization in a completely different manner while trying to build around Big Al. There's still a long way to go before we're a factor in anything meaningful, but the post KG trade moves have been fairly encouraging.
Good post, and I think the KG tie-in is 100% appropriate.
In the past, those extra roster spots would be filled with vets, probably over-priced, or longshot risks that have NBA experience (Oliver Miller, anyone?). When KG was here, we never got a chance to take chances and legitimately rebuild, as we sought that one extra player that would finally give KG his ring. I don't blame management -- fans and media would settle for nothing less while Garnett was on our team. However, the NBA is cyclical. You need to be bad before you can be good. Mediocre teams keep getting medicocre picks. Value comes from getting great, productive lottery picks on cheap NBA contracts. You can't trade for them if you keep getting mediocre trade assets/picks, and if you pick them up in free agency, they are never bargains any more.
David Harrison, Livinsgton, etc are players we can now audition. We can take the risk now because, if they are bad, they aren't hurting anyone's expectations for a championship.