Page 1 of 1
Was Bryzgalov a Bad Signing?
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 1:42 am
by Drake_02
Flyers signed him to a huge deal.
In hindsight, was the deal that pays him 5.6m till 2020 a bad signing?
Your thoughts?
Re: Was Bryzgalov a Bad Signing?
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 12:41 pm
by Morris_Shatford
Yes.
The Flyers always seems to opt for the cheaper alternative in net and I have no idea why;
Vanbiesbrouck over Joseph and then the band-aid solutions like Snow, Wregget, Hackett, Biron, Cechmanek, Boucher, etc etc
Since Hextall its been all ground beef over steak.
The Flyers have poured millions into their positional guys but when they finally open their wallet on a goalie they opt for is solid but hardly elite and get him on a reasonable deal (compared to Lu or Miller etc) but that million + in savings results in a early trip home.
Re: Was Bryzgalov a Bad Signing?
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 6:31 pm
by Nolan
Beyond bad and its going to continue to be very bad for a long time.
Re: Was Bryzgalov a Bad Signing?
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:53 pm
by Morris_Shatford
Nolan wrote:Beyond bad and its going to continue to be very bad for a long time.
The question really becomes how can they get better around that terrible contract?
Re: Was Bryzgalov a Bad Signing?
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 1:32 am
by the_process
Bryz was an awful signing. Thank God for amnesty provisions.