yardbarker

brandon ennings talking smack

Moderators: moocow007, magnumt, j4remi, nyknicks2k2, Knickstape1214, NoLayupRule, kane2021, Thugger HBC, knicks742

ImageImageImageImageImage

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby DocZaius on Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:37 pm

It is indeed smack talk

The only problem is it will be a trap game because we play the Bulls tonight so we might have no energy left to beat the Bucks
DocZaius
RealGM
 
Posts: 31237
And1: 47
Joined: Aug 2, 2005
Location: Let the excuses begin....

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby 21shumpst on Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:46 pm

DocZaius wrote:It is indeed smack talk

The only problem is it will be a trap game because we play the Bulls tonight so we might have no energy left to beat the Bucks


If the Knicks don't come out with energy for what may be the biggest game in like a decade, then they don't deserve to get in the playoffs.
User avatar
21shumpst
Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1308
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 30, 2012

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby The Lamma on Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:49 pm

iHeartKNicks wrote:Brandon Jenny has been talking smack about the Knicks since we didn't draft him. Its cool his mouth's gps is bringing him to 21 shump street



Very true. You know, after what happened with Granger and the how the Knicks responded, hearing Jennifer is adding fuel to the fire can only be +. But... she's not bright enough to realize that is she?

Playoff atmosphere for this one, will be the most important game of the year to date.
User avatar
The Lamma
Junior
 
Posts: 461
And1: 12
Joined: Jan 21, 2012

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby BasicBall on Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:02 pm

I like what he said, teams should be about it this time of year.....Let's get this one tonight and go hoop out vs Milwaukee....he does make a good point, NY will expend some energy vs Chicago tonight and the Bucks are off, I can see them trying to jump on NY early. He has a point! He's a tool, but he has a point
Marv Albert: The Knicks have already said they are not interested in Iverson!
Reggie Miller replies, "You mean to tell me he isn't better than Chris Duhon?"

MEN LIE, WOMEN LIE, NUMBERS DON'T!
BasicBall
RealGM
 
Posts: 10105
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 17, 2003

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby Hodges4Three on Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:03 pm

Honestly I think 21 Shump Street needs to be saved for Monta Ellis. Jennings shoots at a lower percentage anyway, I feel Monta will be a bigger threat offensively.
User avatar
Hodges4Three
Pro Prospect
 
Posts: 965
And1: 8
Joined: Feb 6, 2012

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby Shpati21 on Tue Apr 10, 2012 4:47 pm

Hodges4Three wrote:Honestly I think 21 Shump Street needs to be saved for Monta Ellis. Jennings shoots at a lower percentage anyway, I feel Monta will be a bigger threat offensively.

They are both streaky and a big threat when they are hot. I say let team defense shut down Ellis, since he likes to drive in more than Jennings, and Shumpert shut down Jennings, so he can be right up on Jennings when he tries to shoot threes.
Image Image Image
User avatar
Shpati21
Head Coach
 
Posts: 6260
And1: 32
Joined: Dec 5, 2011
Location: Dibra e Madhe, Shqipëria

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby AggO on Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:05 pm

DocZaius wrote:It is indeed smack talk

The only problem is it will be a trap game because we play the Bulls tonight so we might have no energy left to beat the Bucks

seriously, this is not smack talk. He said nothing about the knicks that could be interpreted as him putting them down.


The Lamma wrote:It IS smack talk. Here's the quote.

Brandon Jennings on blowout loss to OKC: "For sure, Wednesday [vs. #Knicks], that's not going to happen."

Granger saying "two winnable games" implies we were a relatively easy opponent and is def smack.
Ennings doesn't imply quite that, but what it does say is this "we're not THAT good to where we can steamroll them like OKC. OKC might be that good, but the Knicks are not."

The bottom line is this: If you talk about the result, if it's decisive, it's smack talk. You can say you're "hoping" for the win and that's one thing, if you're "going" to win, it's another. Him saying "not going to happen" implies certainty which = smack.


Granger definitely was smack talk because he undercut the Knicks

Jennings says that they arent getting blown out by the Knicks. he isnt guaranteeing a win. All he said was that the Bucks werent getting blown out.

that isnt smack talk

they arent equal. One is smack talk, one isnt.
User avatar
AggO
General Manager
 
Posts: 7514
And1: 51
Joined: Mar 13, 2006

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby god shammgod on Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:07 pm

AggO wrote:
DocZaius wrote:It is indeed smack talk

The only problem is it will be a trap game because we play the Bulls tonight so we might have no energy left to beat the Bucks

seriously, this is not smack talk


yeah. it's not much to get excited about.
dk7th wrote:this deal goes down this is my final post.


viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1093235&start=720
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
 
Posts: 38414
And1: 114
Joined: Feb 17, 2006

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby The Lamma on Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:12 pm

Shpati21 wrote:
Hodges4Three wrote:Honestly I think 21 Shump Street needs to be saved for Monta Ellis. Jennings shoots at a lower percentage anyway, I feel Monta will be a bigger threat offensively.

They are both streaky and a big threat when they are hot. I say let team defense shut down Ellis, since he likes to drive in more than Jennings, and Shumpert shut down Jennings, so he can be right up on Jennings when he tries to shoot threes.



Ellis is the better scorer, but Jennings will have the ball in his hands more, and be more instrumental for dictating the flow and tempo of the game. I think for this reason you have to put Shump on Jenny. If Ellis starts going off, then switch him up.
User avatar
The Lamma
Junior
 
Posts: 461
And1: 12
Joined: Jan 21, 2012

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby 21shumpst on Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:19 pm

Hodges4Three wrote:Honestly I think 21 Shump Street needs to be saved for Monta Ellis. Jennings shoots at a lower percentage anyway, I feel Monta will be a bigger threat offensively.


Shump is so good he can guard both of them at the same time. :wink:
User avatar
21shumpst
Bench Warmer
 
Posts: 1308
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 30, 2012

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby knicks9784 on Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:38 pm

ComboGuardCity wrote:
blueNorange wrote:when you're not good and have been a total obnoxious ass the moment you stepped foot in the nba, you don't talk

what is he supposed to say the Knicks will blow them out? Us fans can't talk when we have shumpert on this team.


+1

dont forget jr lol
Anders wrote:The sweetest revenge is living well! Darius Rucker said it, so you know its real!
User avatar
knicks9784
Sixth Man
 
Posts: 1893
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 16, 2010

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby PeteW on Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:44 pm

Im kind of disappointed he didnt say more.. give the guys some more bulletin board material
PeteW
Starter
 
Posts: 2030
And1: 13
Joined: Nov 10, 2009

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby JoeStalin on Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:48 pm

I still find it funny that Jennings said he would go to a big market in FA. As if there was some sort of competition for his services.
JoeStalin
Sophomore
 
Posts: 141
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 9, 2012

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby blueNorange on Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:06 pm

you guys know diddly squat about pitches

sure it's not serious smack talk, if the topic was 'brandon ennings talking light smack talk' noone would care

the title appeals
Image
User avatar
blueNorange
RealGM
 
Posts: 31141
And1: 60
Joined: Jul 29, 2005
Location: grr

Re: brandon ennings talking smack

Postby MeloNY on Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:06 pm

Hodges4Three wrote:Honestly I think 21 Shump Street needs to be saved for Monta Ellis. Jennings shoots at a lower percentage anyway, I feel Monta will be a bigger threat offensively.


I'd like to see Smith match up with Ellis. He basically would be guarding a slightly better offensive version of himself.
Image
User avatar
MeloNY
Pro Prospect
 
Posts: 965
And1: 9
Joined: Aug 3, 2010

PreviousNext

Return to New York Knicks

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ag3, AJB, AllanHoustonFan, Bran Fast Hands, Brownsville's Finest, carmelo115, CDAZ, Daaaarryyl, DE FENSE, denterprise, duetta, Fat Kat, GC Pantalones, GettinitDone, GONYK, Google Adsense [Bot], Gregory151, Grinditout, HakeemKnicks, johnnywishbone, Juggynaut, Kn1cksNation, Knick_Fury, kNicksGmen, knicksnation1, lazard, Lin Your Face, MaluKing2K, NYKat, NYKnickerbocker, NYs Finest, ohboy109, Paradise, Pharmcat , RoseTheFuture22, sacstar16, Sky_Knicks, SonOfMars, Steve Nash Jr, TommyNYK34