Page 1 of 4

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:55 pm
by j4remi
I could see the Hawks, Pistons and Kings making runs at JR tbh...but I'm confident that he'll want to stay in NY unless he gets some massive offer that shouldn't happen.

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:57 pm
by GratefulDead
fdr2012 wrote:
21shumpshumpst wrote:Damn this thread made me worried we will lose JR next season. If we only have early bird rights and can offer him 5 million a year max then he is gone for sure. Someone is going to offer him more money than that. :evil: :evil: :(


Who? There is nobody who's giving him more money.


Lol this exact thing was said about lin and landry.... "nobody will give them more..."

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:03 am
by fdr2012
j4remi wrote:I could see the Hawks, Pistons and Kings making runs at JR tbh...but I'm confident that he'll want to stay in NY unless he gets some massive offer that shouldn't happen.


Pistons? They are going nowhere and they have been burnt with every FA signing during the past 5 years. They already have Stuckey at the 2. ZERO chance they throw money @ JR.

Kings? The only way they do something is if they waive Tyreke. I doubt they want to pair Cousins with JR.

Hawks? They just signed Lou Williams. ZERO chance they throw money on JR.

JR has a bad rep in the league. He's 27, so he's only good for a win-now team. Nobody is giving him more than $5M.

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:05 am
by Thugger HBC
JR is loyal to a tee.

He won't leave his brother Melo, and his dad, Mr. Woodson.

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:05 am
by fdr2012
GratefulDead wrote:Lol this exact thing was said about lin and landry.... "nobody will give them more..."


Everybody knew Lin was getting offers, if not only for the China marketing appeal. Houston was pretty obvious.
As for Landry - there was only one GM who offered him anything and you're forgetting Landry is known to be a great character glue guy who was only 24.

Nobody wanted JR this summer, so I can't see how or why that changes.

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:10 am
by Never Wrong
If there was a team willing to throw big money at him, he wouldn't be here.

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:21 am
by NY2k1
fdr2012 wrote:
GratefulDead wrote:Lol this exact thing was said about lin and landry.... "nobody will give them more..."


Everybody knew Lin was getting offers, if not only for the China marketing appeal. Houston was pretty obvious.
As for Landry - there was only one GM who offered him anything and you're forgetting Landry is known to be a great character glue guy who was only 24.

Nobody wanted JR this summer, so I can't see how or why that changes.


And the only reason Toronto signed Landry was to cock block us from getting Nash :lol: :lol:

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:39 am
by j4remi
fdr2012 wrote:
j4remi wrote:I could see the Hawks, Pistons and Kings making runs at JR tbh...but I'm confident that he'll want to stay in NY unless he gets some massive offer that shouldn't happen.


Pistons? They are going nowhere and they have been burnt with every FA signing during the past 5 years. They already have Stuckey at the 2. ZERO chance they throw money @ JR.

Kings? The only way they do something is if they waive Tyreke. I doubt they want to pair Cousins with JR.

Hawks? They just signed Lou Williams. ZERO chance they throw money on JR.

JR has a bad rep in the league. He's 27, so he's only good for a win-now team. Nobody is giving him more than $5M.


If I'm not mistaken Stuckey is about to be an FA and he's been miserable this season. They will look to upgrade if he can't turn it around.

Kings let Evans run the point plenty with Salmons as the 2 guy...JR is an upgrade over Salmons without a doubt.

Hawks are gonna let a lot of contracts expire and rebuild around their core...Included in the expirings is Kyle Korver, they're main shooting threat. They'll be happy to replace him with JR who's 27 and adds more dimensions than simply shooting.

JR's rep is going to vanish if he keeps up his level of play. Landry Fields just got a huge pay day. Jamal Crawford is becoming one of the big impact signings of the off season and he's done it in a JR Smith role. I'm hopeful that we keep JR and 5 million seems reasonable, but after this past off season craziness...I'm not taking for granted that there are some teams with needs that JR would fit.

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:42 am
by JDs_loot
Sark wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:Jr wants the bigger payday.

You need bird rights for that.

He's on the cheap now......

That's Earl.

Sent from my Asus TR700T-B1-GR using Xparent Sky Blue Tapatalk 2


What do you think he's gonna get in the next contract? 4/$48m sound right?


4 years 24 million.

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:47 am
by j4remi
Thugger HBC wrote:JR is loyal to a tee.

He won't leave his brother Melo, and his dad, Mr. Woodson.


That's what I'm banking on. I've been a huge fan of JR Smith since he did the behind the back dunk at the dunk contest :lol: ...He's been amazing this season and I have no qualms signing him well past the 3 year bench mark that has been set by most of our contracts. 5 million for what he's given us thus far seems like a perfect deal.

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:55 am
by 21shumpshumpst
Thugger HBC wrote:JR is loyal to a tee.

He won't leave his brother Melo, and his dad, Mr. Woodson.

I don't know man. I think that he is going to get payed handsomely next year.

Man this sucks I didn't know about this whole early bird rights thing. Now I am definitely worried. :(

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:04 am
by FrozenInfernoZX
GeneralNbaFan wrote:Why did this guy sign only for 2,8 mio?

Camby, Novak, Felton, Kidd are earning more than him!


Because in sports, NBA in particular, payrolls are skewed like that. Thing is, players get payed before performance which I think is a faulty system in its own right. First and foremost, J.R. was not this kind of player when we first signed him. If he was, we were not going to be able to afford him. Simple. Other teams would offer him much more money.

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:45 am
by sebstar
fdr2012 wrote:
GratefulDead wrote:Lol this exact thing was said about lin and landry.... "nobody will give them more..."


Everybody knew Lin was getting offers, if not only for the China marketing appeal. Houston was pretty obvious.
As for Landry - there was only one GM who offered him anything and you're forgetting Landry is known to be a great character glue guy who was only 24.

Nobody wanted JR this summer, so I can't see how or why that changes.


I think you're seriously overplaying this "character issue" stuff. What exactly has J.R done that would significantly impact his future earning potential? If continues with his mature attitude and high level of play, he'll certainly be a hot commodity on the market during the offseason. He'll be in that 10+ mill a year range.

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:51 am
by Thugger HBC
I'm researching with some guys help, but I'm not sure what his max can be.

I read somewhere his max with us is around 5+ starting, but if we have his bird rights, how is another team able to offer more?

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:32 am
by GeneralNbaFan
fdr2012 wrote:
GeneralNbaFan wrote:I really dont like him as a player and I dont think he had the upside to become a "Superstar" like Kobe, but I think hes worth 10mio. +


There will be 10 teas under the cap next season. Which one offer JR $10M?

1. Houston
2. Phoenix
3. Kings
4. Cavs
5. Bucks
6. NOH
7. Jazz
8. Hawks
9. Pistons
10. Mavs

People are forgetting that Mayo got $4M and he's 24.


To be honest all of them! And Mayo should also get more, like 8 mio... only 8 because he decreased his value in memphis!

And everyone was expecting him to be a good 6th man! Stats like 15-4-2.... the only explanation: He got paid under the table!

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:57 am
by Pharmcat
jr smith was the best value signing of the OS

the guy is so loyal, took less money to stay unlike others

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:59 am
by boomann21
Pharmcat wrote:jr smith was the best value signing of the OS

the guy is so loyal, took less money to stay unlike others



Who are these others that you speak of? I wanted no part of Landry Fields... :wink:

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:19 am
by Knicks_Fan2
Could go either way with him this year; thankfully we can funnel some more money to him through his brother.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk 2

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:53 am
by NBA Fan 1234
GeneralNbaFan wrote:
fdr2012 wrote:
GeneralNbaFan wrote:I really dont like him as a player and I dont think he had the upside to become a "Superstar" like Kobe, but I think hes worth 10mio. +


There will be 10 teas under the cap next season. Which one offer JR $10M?

1. Houston
2. Phoenix
3. Kings
4. Cavs
5. Bucks
6. NOH
7. Jazz
8. Hawks
9. Pistons
10. Mavs

People are forgetting that Mayo got $4M and he's 24.


To be honest all of them! And Mayo should also get more, like 8 mio... only 8 because he decreased his value in memphis!

And everyone was expecting him to be a good 6th man! Stats like 15-4-2.... the only explanation: He got paid under the table!


clearly. everything is a conspiracy.

none of those teams are going to be throwing 8 mill at jr.

Re: J.R. SMITH : best price/benefit ratio?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:10 am
by Sark
Basically everyone is saying he is the best signing of the offseason, and underpaid, yet he won't get paid next year? :roll: