Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=1215410
gavran wrote:I'm a pageant, I don't celebrate Christmas, well at least not without blood sacrifice.
siar617 wrote:gavran wrote:siar617 wrote:You all just expect too much from him. He is a Situational player only.
How is this guy posting while being suspended?
I am GOD
and Christmas for U
Knicksfan20 wrote:When Novak is in the game, our overall defense becomes really bad. Yes I get it that he tries, but he's just too slow. I'd rather see more Camby/White/Brewer then Novak, preferably Camby. I also think missing sheed is really hurting us. He s a tremendous leader on thr court. And we need his defense and toughness.
he was kinda useless in that zone also. They basically played a 2 2 zone against us and stuck Novak, rendering him useless. I just don't think he's a good fit for a Woodson ran team. We need to get back to playing defense and forcing turnovers. He should be a situational player and get top 12 mpg (unless he's hot, then you ride the wave)
Novak only had 1 rebound that entire game, and it was a gimmie. He trys on defense, but his lack of athleticism really hurts. He cant recover and hes slow at closing out and gets beat easy. He doesnt rebound the ball, but if he isnt making at least 3 threes in a game, he is useless. Its basically 4-4 on offense and 4-5 on defense.
YOU DONT TRADE NOVAK. He is still a very valuable weapon in certain situations. Unless you can trade him with another player and upgrade us somewhere, then you keep him. He has a good relationship with the team too.
Nostrand Ave wrote:Knicksfan20 wrote:When Novak is in the game, our overall defense becomes really bad. Yes I get it that he tries, but he's just too slow. I'd rather see more Camby/White/Brewer then Novak, preferably Camby. I also think missing sheed is really hurting us. He s a tremendous leader on thr court. And we need his defense and toughness.
he was kinda useless in that zone also. They basically played a 2 2 zone against us and stuck Novak, rendering him useless. I just don't think he's a good fit for a Woodson ran team. We need to get back to playing defense and forcing turnovers. He should be a situational player and get top 12 mpg (unless he's hot, then you ride the wave)
Novak only had 1 rebound that entire game, and it was a gimmie. He trys on defense, but his lack of athleticism really hurts. He cant recover and hes slow at closing out and gets beat easy. He doesnt rebound the ball, but if he isnt making at least 3 threes in a game, he is useless. Its basically 4-4 on offense and 4-5 on defense.
YOU DONT TRADE NOVAK. He is still a very valuable weapon in certain situations. Unless you can trade him with another player and upgrade us somewhere, then you keep him. He has a good relationship with the team too.
I dont see how Novak has any upside. Having a good relationship with the team is not enough of a reason to keep him. He was a liability on defense. But now he's also a liability on offense.
Knicksfan20 wrote:Nostrand Ave wrote:Knicksfan20 wrote:When Novak is in the game, our overall defense becomes really bad. Yes I get it that he tries, but he's just too slow. I'd rather see more Camby/White/Brewer then Novak, preferably Camby. I also think missing sheed is really hurting us. He s a tremendous leader on thr court. And we need his defense and toughness.
he was kinda useless in that zone also. They basically played a 2 2 zone against us and stuck Novak, rendering him useless. I just don't think he's a good fit for a Woodson ran team. We need to get back to playing defense and forcing turnovers. He should be a situational player and get top 12 mpg (unless he's hot, then you ride the wave)
Novak only had 1 rebound that entire game, and it was a gimmie. He trys on defense, but his lack of athleticism really hurts. He cant recover and hes slow at closing out and gets beat easy. He doesnt rebound the ball, but if he isnt making at least 3 threes in a game, he is useless. Its basically 4-4 on offense and 4-5 on defense.
YOU DONT TRADE NOVAK. He is still a very valuable weapon in certain situations. Unless you can trade him with another player and upgrade us somewhere, then you keep him. He has a good relationship with the team too.
I dont see how Novak has any upside. Having a good relationship with the team is not enough of a reason to keep him. He was a liability on defense. But now he's also a liability on offense.
because he's the best shooter in the league, and if we need to draw up a play for a game winner.. I want him in to this Melo more room.
the91ser wrote:he spaces the floor. even when hes 0 for 3 for the whole game, he creates valuable space for others to score just by being out there.
@ Novak being a liability on offense. You don't have players like this, you don't win any games. He enables other Knicks players to score simply by stepping on the court. The man is a weapon.Thugger HBC wrote:I would love to see the team efficiency stats on offense when Novak is on the floor.
Not +/- but actual percents.
Sent from my Asus TR700T-B1-GR using Xparent Sky Blue Tapatalk 2
Knickstape1214 wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:I would love to see the team efficiency stats on offense when Novak is on the floor.
Not +/- but actual percents.
Sent from my Asus TR700T-B1-GR using Xparent Sky Blue Tapatalk 2
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... -off/2013/
Thugger HBC wrote:Knickstape1214 wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:I would love to see the team efficiency stats on offense when Novak is on the floor.
Not +/- but actual percents.
Sent from my Asus TR700T-B1-GR using Xparent Sky Blue Tapatalk 2
http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... -off/2013/
If I'm reading that right its safe to say they're better when he's off the court?
Sent from my Asus TR700T-B1-GR using Xparent Sky Blue Tapatalk 2
