ImageImageImageImageImage

The Manhattan Knicks?

Moderators: moocow007, Knickstape1214, magnumt, GONYK, j4remi, Thugger HBC, NoLayupRule, Thorn, Brooklyn_Yards, mrpoetryNmotion

User avatar
NYKinMIA
Analyst
Posts: 3,574
And1: 1,710
Joined: Jul 26, 2012
Location: - Jill Martin's thong
 

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#16 » by NYKinMIA » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:52 am

Paradise wrote:Here's why we say that (not trolling or nothing just informing) but there is three reasons:

1. The "Knickerbocker" name comes from the pseudonym used by Washington Irving in his book A History of New York, a name which became applied to the descendants of the original Dutch settlers of what later became New York, and later, by extension, to New Yorkers in general. Irving was from Manhattan, New York and was inspired that name from living there. The Knicks were never named off of the entire state, it was always based on the city.

2. The postal code for Manhattan is New York, NY as the postal code for Brooklyn is Brooklyn, NY.

3. And of course, the obvious the bias...There is two teams in NY that are fairly contenders (obviously, the Knicks are ahead than we are right now) so New York supremacy is up for grabs in terms of race to get a championship.


OK bro. Thanks for the history lesson. Now good luck with that race to a championship thing.
User avatar
Starks
Veteran
Posts: 2,527
And1: 133
Joined: Jun 20, 2003

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#17 » by Starks » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:43 am

Haha Nets "fans" are so funny. They think their team is legit because they are selling merchandise. SMH
User avatar
UnderdogKnicks
Starter
Posts: 2,007
And1: 40
Joined: Mar 11, 2012
Location: 21 Shump Street Brooklyn, NY

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#18 » by UnderdogKnicks » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:57 am

Knicks represent New York including Brooklyn like the name suggests, any1 that says otherwise needs to learn how to read. Giants and Jets play on NJ's turf but they still represent NY. Only people who has bias say things like Manhattan Knicks, NJ Giants, or NJ Jets, etc.
Classics :

Knicks, Giants, Yankees, Rangers
TheGarden
Banned User
Posts: 10,478
And1: 1,155
Joined: Jun 11, 2012

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#19 » by TheGarden » Sat Dec 15, 2012 11:21 am

LOL this Brooklyn ish is too funny they're trying way too hard
ctorres
RealGM
Posts: 12,464
And1: 1,154
Joined: Jun 04, 2005
Contact:

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#20 » by ctorres » Sat Dec 15, 2012 11:44 am

On a random note, I found out the other day that while the Nets were in Jersey during their first two years of existence in the ABA, they were the New York Nets from 1968 to 1977 based out of Long Island. I'm surprised that doesn't get mentioned here more often.
User avatar
DMass
Pro Prospect
Posts: 845
And1: 100
Joined: Dec 22, 2011
     

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#21 » by DMass » Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:29 pm

In all honesty, it was good marketing from the Nets to start this "battle of the boroughs" nonsense. Making us out to be the Manhattan Knicks is what they want at the end of the day.

It's brilliant how we've gone about dismantling the Brooklyn hype though with our start to the season. Everyone is talking about the Knicks - as always.
Image

“There’s always going to be Knicks fans, though,” Williams said. “They’ll sneak in. They’ll find a way.”
badboy0624
Sophomore
Posts: 206
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 06, 2005
Location: Long Island
Contact:

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#22 » by badboy0624 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:05 pm

NYKinMIA wrote:
Paradise wrote:Here's why we say that (not trolling or nothing just informing) but there is three reasons:

1. The "Knickerbocker" name comes from the pseudonym used by Washington Irving in his book A History of New York, a name which became applied to the descendants of the original Dutch settlers of what later became New York, and later, by extension, to New Yorkers in general. Irving was from Manhattan, New York and was inspired that name from living there. The Knicks were never named off of the entire state, it was always based on the city.

2. The postal code for Manhattan is New York, NY as the postal code for Brooklyn is Brooklyn, NY.

3. And of course, the obvious the bias...There is two teams in NY that are fairly contenders (obviously, the Knicks are ahead than we are right now) so New York supremacy is up for grabs in terms of race to get a championship.



-New York City is New York... Manhatten is New York.... its one the largest cities in the country and the world... my postal code says massapequa, new york. If I'm reading this right your basing the acsention of brooklyn because your postal code is "brooklyn, NEW YORK"? What about Hamptons, ny? Staten Island, ny? Its all New york. I like the rivalry between the knicks and the nets. I honestly havnt hated a team like i hate the nets since the 90's rivalry with the bulls. To start calling the New York Knicks "manhatten Knicks" is dumb and ignorant. The nets are the little brother of new york and always will be. I'm not judging you on being a fan of the nets, but lets be real here. Most Net fans now were fair weather knick fans. Knicks are New York
21shumpshumpst
Banned User
Posts: 2,655
And1: 36
Joined: Aug 14, 2012

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#23 » by 21shumpshumpst » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:32 pm

Paradise wrote:Here's why we say that (not trolling or nothing just informing) but there is three reasons:

1. The "Knickerbocker" name comes from the pseudonym used by Washington Irving in his book A History of New York, a name which became applied to the descendants of the original Dutch settlers of what later became New York, and later, by extension, to New Yorkers in general. Irving was from Manhattan, New York and was inspired that name from living there. The Knicks were never named off of the entire state, it was always based on the city.

2. The postal code for Manhattan is New York, NY as the postal code for Brooklyn is Brooklyn, NY.

3. And of course, the obvious the bias...There is two teams in NY that are fairly contenders (obviously, the Knicks are ahead than we are right now) so New York supremacy is up for grabs in terms of race to get a championship.

STFU there is no rivalry. You guys are trash. You are not contenders. Double OT to beat the freaking Pistons. You are have 0 cap space, 0 picks. You have this trash team that has Blatche and the man formerly known as Mr Kardashian as your starters. GTFO.

I have never hated a fan base as much as these idiot Nyet fans. They make a move and as if that makes them a better basketball team. You will always be a 2nd class citizen in NY. Btw no one in the world other than people in Brooklyn give a sh*t about Brooklyn.

If you meet people from around the world they equate NY with Manhattan NOT BROOKLYN. GTFO with this trash. You are not on our level and will never be.
AmazingJason
Head Coach
Posts: 6,749
And1: 1,703
Joined: Aug 07, 2006
Location: NYC
   

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#24 » by AmazingJason » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:43 pm

21shumpshumpst wrote:STFU there is no rivalry. You guys are trash. You are not contenders. Double OT to beat the freaking Pistons. You are have 0 cap space, 0 picks. You have this trash team that has Blatche and the man formerly known as Mr Kardashian as your starters. GTFO.

I have never hated a fan base as much as these idiot Nyet fans. They make a move and as if that makes them a better basketball team. You will always be a 2nd class citizen in NY. Btw no one in the world other than people in Brooklyn give a sh*t about Brooklyn.

If you meet people from around the world they equate NY with Manhattan NOT BROOKLYN. GTFO with this trash. You are not on our level and will never be.


One problem. THERE IS NO FANBASE. There is no fanbase to even hate. They have a decent team, but nobody goes to the games. There are tons of $10-$25 tickets available. I personally don't know any Brooklyn Nets fans. I'll see people occasionally wearing some gear, but they're not even real fans of the team, lol. The truth is nobody really cares about them right now. Maybe in the future, but right now.
Image
BOOMbip
Banned User
Posts: 1,800
And1: 170
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: The views expressed are intended for entertaiment purposes only

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#25 » by BOOMbip » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:53 pm

This reminds me of some dude who just moved to NY from NJ but wants to consider themselves a true NYer..... sorry bub, it doesn't happen just because you change addresses, that doesn't make you a true NYer... you are still a transplant.
21shumpshumpst
Banned User
Posts: 2,655
And1: 36
Joined: Aug 14, 2012

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#26 » by 21shumpshumpst » Sat Dec 15, 2012 4:59 pm

AmazingJason wrote:
21shumpshumpst wrote:STFU there is no rivalry. You guys are trash. You are not contenders. Double OT to beat the freaking Pistons. You are have 0 cap space, 0 picks. You have this trash team that has Blatche and the man formerly known as Mr Kardashian as your starters. GTFO.

I have never hated a fan base as much as these idiot Nyet fans. They make a move and as if that makes them a better basketball team. You will always be a 2nd class citizen in NY. Btw no one in the world other than people in Brooklyn give a sh*t about Brooklyn.

If you meet people from around the world they equate NY with Manhattan NOT BROOKLYN. GTFO with this trash. You are not on our level and will never be.


One problem. THERE IS NO FANBASE. There is no fanbase to even hate. They have a decent team, but nobody goes to the games. There are tons of $10-$25 tickets available. I personally don't know any Brooklyn Nets fans. I'll see people occasionally wearing some gear, but they're not even real fans of the team, lol. The truth is nobody really cares about them right now. Maybe in the future, but right now.


I was talking to the 5 guys who are nets fans including that vincecarter idiot who posts over on their board. If you look up delusional in the dictionary you will see his picture on it. :lol:
21shumpshumpst
Banned User
Posts: 2,655
And1: 36
Joined: Aug 14, 2012

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#27 » by 21shumpshumpst » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:00 pm

BOOMbip wrote:This reminds me of some dude who just moved to NY from NJ but wants to consider themselves a true NYer..... sorry bub, it doesn't happen just because you change addresses, that doesn't make you a true NYer... you are still a transplant.

99% of manhattan are transplants. Then the Knicks don't have a true fanbase? :o :o
BOOMbip
Banned User
Posts: 1,800
And1: 170
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: The views expressed are intended for entertaiment purposes only

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#28 » by BOOMbip » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:08 pm

Um....99%? Did you get that number from the Myass Statistical Foundation? Plus you can be a 'true fan' of the Knicks without being a true NYer.
21shumpshumpst
Banned User
Posts: 2,655
And1: 36
Joined: Aug 14, 2012

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#29 » by 21shumpshumpst » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:11 pm

BOOMbip wrote:Um....99%? Did you get that number from the Myass Statistical Foundation? Plus you can be a 'true fan' of the Knicks without being a true NYer.

It was hyperbole of course. But if you are in manhattan most people are not originally from there. They come from all walks of life.
User avatar
DE FENSE
Suspended
Posts: 13,328
And1: 1,253
Joined: Aug 22, 2006
Location: Brooklyn
   

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#30 » by DE FENSE » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:14 pm

ctorres wrote:On a random note, I found out the other day that while the Nets were in Jersey during their first two years of existence in the ABA, they were the New York Nets from 1968 to 1977 based out of Long Island. I'm surprised that doesn't get mentioned here more often.


No offense to you, but I thought that was common knowledge. You know Dr. J played for that team too, right?
ImageImage
User avatar
DE FENSE
Suspended
Posts: 13,328
And1: 1,253
Joined: Aug 22, 2006
Location: Brooklyn
   

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#31 » by DE FENSE » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:17 pm

AmazingJason wrote:
21shumpshumpst wrote:STFU there is no rivalry. You guys are trash. You are not contenders. Double OT to beat the freaking Pistons. You are have 0 cap space, 0 picks. You have this trash team that has Blatche and the man formerly known as Mr Kardashian as your starters. GTFO.

I have never hated a fan base as much as these idiot Nyet fans. They make a move and as if that makes them a better basketball team. You will always be a 2nd class citizen in NY. Btw no one in the world other than people in Brooklyn give a sh*t about Brooklyn.

If you meet people from around the world they equate NY with Manhattan NOT BROOKLYN. GTFO with this trash. You are not on our level and will never be.


One problem. THERE IS NO FANBASE. There is no fanbase to even hate. They have a decent team, but nobody goes to the games. There are tons of $10-$25 tickets available. I personally don't know any Brooklyn Nets fans. I'll see people occasionally wearing some gear, but they're not even real fans of the team, lol. The truth is nobody really cares about them right now. Maybe in the future, but right now.


Yeah, that fanbase needs a lot of work. Being at that game on Tuesday @ Barclays was a revelation.
ImageImage
User avatar
Thugger HBC
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 36,682
And1: 5,568
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#32 » by Thugger HBC » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:18 pm

DE FENSE wrote:
ctorres wrote:On a random note, I found out the other day that while the Nets were in Jersey during their first two years of existence in the ABA, they were the New York Nets from 1968 to 1977 based out of Long Island. I'm surprised that doesn't get mentioned here more often.


No offense to you, but I thought that was common knowledge. You know Dr. J played for that team too, right?

Yeah apparently it isn't common knowledge to most of their fans and media folk.

Even then the Knicks were always the NBA team of NY, the Nets were always second citizen, especially not being an original NBA team.
Image
BOOMbip
Banned User
Posts: 1,800
And1: 170
Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Location: The views expressed are intended for entertaiment purposes only

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#33 » by BOOMbip » Sat Dec 15, 2012 5:18 pm

21shumpshumpst wrote:
BOOMbip wrote:Um....99%? Did you get that number from the Myass Statistical Foundation? Plus you can be a 'true fan' of the Knicks without being a true NYer.

It was hyperbole of course. But if you are in manhattan most people are not originally from there. They come from all walks of life.


Yes, but you don't move to NY in September and by December you are all of a sudden a true NYer... :lol:

The Nets will always be swamp dwellers to me.... Bwahahahahaaaaaa
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 27,453
And1: 5,007
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: Harlem, New York
       

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#34 » by HarthorneWingo » Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:45 pm

F that.

It was ... is it ... and it will always be ... the "New York Knicks."
User avatar
Signature NYK
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,579
And1: 263
Joined: Jul 22, 2010
     

Re: The Manhattan Knicks? 

Post#35 » by Signature NYK » Sat Dec 15, 2012 7:13 pm

Lol I live in NJ and have been a knick fan since I was 9 (currently 19). Screw Brooklyn
Image

Return to New York Knicks