yaboynyp wrote:
You mean we’re not brothers?
Nope, my brothers actually possess intelligence .
Moderators: dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, GONYK, mpharris36, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully
yaboynyp wrote:
You mean we’re not brothers?
Do you believe that Heroin or Crack Cocaine should be legal?
So because criminals will always find a way to get guns, we shouldn't have any laws or restrictions on guns?
AndroidMan wrote:yaboynyp wrote:
You mean we’re not brothers?
Nope, my brothers actually possess intellect.
alphad0gz wrote:Do you believe that Heroin or Crack Cocaine should be legal?
You have to be either a troll, or willfully (or otherwise) ignorant. It's clear to see you have no critical thinking ability, although you may develop it as you grow. I'm not hopeful. Either way, I refuse to get drawn into an argument consisting of weak, uninformed, thoughts. Done with youSo because criminals will always find a way to get guns, we shouldn't have any laws or restrictions on guns?
And for you, the last time, as well........If laws have no impact on actions, what is the purpose of the law? Law-abiding, sane people already obey the law and act in a manner that is consistent with the "purpose" of any new proposed laws. Since any new laws provide no real difference, what is their purpose? Come up with laws that can keep guns from those that would use them against innocent citizens, and I will give it honest consideration, provided the law is enforceable.
yaboynyp wrote:AndroidMan wrote:yaboynyp wrote:
You mean we’re not brothers?
Nope, my brothers actually possess intellect.
Are you his sister?
alphad0gz wrote:Do you believe that Heroin or Crack Cocaine should be legal?
You have to be either a troll, or willfully (or otherwise) ignorant. It's clear to see you have no critical thinking ability, although you may develop it as you grow. I'm not hopeful. Either way, I refuse to get drawn into an argument consisting of weak, uninformed, thoughts. Done with youSo because criminals will always find a way to get guns, we shouldn't have any laws or restrictions on guns?
And for you, the last time, as well........If laws have no impact on actions, what is the purpose of the law? Law-abiding, sane people already obey the law and act in a manner that is consistent with the "purpose" of any new proposed laws. Since any new laws provide no real difference, what is their purpose? Come up with laws that can keep guns from those that would use them against innocent citizens, and I will give it honest consideration, provided the law is enforceable.
AndroidMan wrote:yaboynyp wrote:AndroidMan wrote:
Nope, my brothers actually possess intellect.
Are you his sister?
Lol, I was beating around the bush, but now I'll just ask it directly. Do you even have a father? One that actually raised you? Just curious.
Edit - If you did, he damn sure failed you.
yaboynyp wrote:AndroidMan wrote:
Lol, I was beating around the bush, but now I'll just ask it directly. Do you even have a father? One that actually raised you? Just curious.
Edit - If you did, he damn sure failed you.
The Mad Thinker created me just like you Android Man. See now your making me mad, denying my supervillian status will not be tolerated!
AndroidMan wrote:yaboynyp wrote:AndroidMan wrote:
Lol, I was beating around the bush, but now I'll just ask it directly. Do you even have a father? One that actually raised you? Just curious.
Edit - If you did, he damn sure failed you.
The Mad Thinker created me just like you Android Man. See now your making me mad, denying my supervillian status will not be tolerated!
Your response is sarcasm to a question like that? Answer the question!!??? Grrrrrrr before I use my Super Villian powers to vanquish you from this RealGM forum you ignorant, fatherless (maybe) uninformed gun law advocate!!! Did I mention your really ignorant??
alphad0gz wrote:
And for you, the last time, as well........If laws have no impact on actions, what is the purpose of the law? Law-abiding, sane people already obey the law and act in a manner that is consistent with the "purpose" of any new proposed laws. Since any new laws provide no real difference, what is their purpose? Come up with laws that can keep guns from those that would use them against innocent citizens, and I will give it honest consideration, provided the law is enforceable.
yaboynyp wrote:AndroidMan wrote:
Your response is sarcasm to a question like that? Answer the question.
No Response
AndroidMan wrote:yaboynyp wrote:AndroidMan wrote:
Your response is sarcasm to a question like that? Answer the question.
No Response
I'll just assume that you grew up without a father then, or were severely neglected as a child. That must be the reasons for you acting out.
yaboynyp wrote:Now as much fun as it has been for the other thousands of posters to read our super hero spat play itself out in the Assault Weapons Ban Clarification Thread if you would like to continue this OT discussion please use the PM...
AndroidMan wrote:yaboynyp wrote:Now as much fun as it has been for the other thousands of posters to read our super hero spat play itself out in the Assault Weapons Ban Clarification Thread if you would like to continue this OT discussion please use the PM...
You don't respond to me and I never have a reason to speak to you ever again, nor would I ever want to. If you call my name or quote one of my posts, expect me to respond. Try using non comic book references as well. Some of us are adults here, and we have no idea what the hell your comic book references refer to. Grow up as well.
yaboynyp wrote:AndroidMan wrote:yaboynyp wrote:Now as much fun as it has been for the other thousands of posters to read our super hero spat play itself out in the Assault Weapons Ban Clarification Thread if you would like to continue this OT discussion please use the PM...
You don't respond to me and I never have a reason to speak to you ever again, nor would I ever want to. If you call my name or quote one of my posts, expect me to respond. Try using non comic book references as well. Some of us are adults here, and we have no idea what the hell your comic book references refer to. Grow up as well.
Oh he mad ^^^ I will enlighten you.. homie?
http://marvel.com/universe/Android_Man
Falstaffxx wrote:
This isn't some short-term thing where people want to have a revolution next year or something. Don't be short sighted. And acting as if preserving the ability to protect ourselves against the government some day down the line is just about "black helicopters" is just willful refusal to think. If you neuter citizens now, it could have an impact for hundreds of years.
By the way, I'm not even necessarily against more gun control. It just bothers me that people refuse to acknowledge that the rights involved are significant.
AndroidMan wrote:yaboynyp wrote:AndroidMan wrote:
You don't respond to me and I never have a reason to speak to you ever again, nor would I ever want to. If you call my name or quote one of my posts, expect me to respond. Try using non comic book references as well. Some of us are adults here, and we have no idea what the hell your comic book references refer to. Grow up as well.
Oh he mad ^^^ I will enlighten you.. homie?
http://marvel.com/universe/Android_Man
Like I said, I don't read comic books, never have. Enjoy them though. They seem to represent your lack of intellect and your immature behavior. Continue on.
ORANGEandBLUE wrote:alphad0gz wrote:[
Once again, assault weapons are simply not the threat they are made out to be. That is a fact supported universally by statistics. What exactly are you trying to accomplish and why? The opinion that they are unnecessary is completely irrelevant, unless you are saying that the government has the right to tell you what you can have and do without any real reason. Jesus, people on here are stupid. What is the practical reason for having one? The question ia better asked as what is the practical reason for making people give them up? A course to educate people on gun use? Seriously? You think this stuff was an accident or borne out of gun ignorance? You think some kind of law would have stopped even a fraction of this? People committing murder are hardly concerned with the legality of their method. That's like saying a person stealing a car would be worried about a parking ticket.
The bottom line, and it really is the bottom line, is that if people want to shoot people, they will find a way regardless of laws. And by the way, if you think there was bloodshed from these incidents you are talking about, wait til you see what happens when they have to go door to door demanding guns from owners. Not saying I would shoot someone doing so, but I promise you there are scores of people that would.
I think the issue is not so much assault rifles, but high capacity magazine. A high capacity magazine is a threat because it allows one to inflict a large amount of damage in a short amount of time. I think the policy is, we won't stop mass-shootings, but with lower capacity magazines, the death counts won't be so high.
seren wrote:Jon Stewart had a nice segment on the issue about the laws on the books and how NRA and its representation in the congress made it impossible to implement many of those laws.
The most interesting tidbit in the segment was that 53 percent of guns used in violent crimes could be traced to 1 percent of sellers.