Page 4 of 5

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:37 am
by Thugger HBC
HakeemKnicks wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:A Celtic loss always make for a good evening.


Don't know why I felt conflicted choosing between "rooting" for the Bulls or Celtics.

Boston losing is so much more gratifying.

I honestly can't see the conflict.

**** Boston, i dont even eat baked beans because I think it comes from there.

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:37 am
by aj49689
Knicksman780 wrote:They might pull the mic from Van Gundy soon..I'm dying over here too...

LMAO

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:41 am
by aj49689
It was good to see Boston lose such a close game and why does it seem like P. Pierce plays better against us then other teams. Oh, our defense, I hope Shump can help change that, Can't wait for K-mart to happen.

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:49 am
by Tron Carter
Thugger HBC wrote:
HakeemKnicks wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:A Celtic loss always make for a good evening.


Don't know why I felt conflicted choosing between "rooting" for the Bulls or Celtics.

Boston losing is so much more gratifying.

I honestly can't see the conflict.

**** Boston, i dont even eat baked beans because I think it comes from there.


I was thinking more from a current standings perspective then who I hated more but I see where you're coming from.

Still pleased with the result.

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:49 am
by Knicksman780
Best part of the Van Gundy rant was when they came back from commercial, the first thing he says is "I'm still mad!" Lol

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:57 am
by Thugger HBC
HakeemKnicks wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:
HakeemKnicks wrote:Don't know why I felt conflicted choosing between "rooting" for the Bulls or Celtics.

Boston losing is so much more gratifying.

I honestly can't see the conflict.

**** Boston, i dont even eat baked beans because I think it comes from there.


I was thinking more from a current standings perspective then who I hated more but I see where you're coming from.

Still pleased with the result.

Yeah, even from a standings perspective I see no issue, just lose Boston, lose all you want.

Downright sickening hearing sports outlets talk about that team "coming". Please, you are what your record says, barely above .500.

Chicago honestly doesn't concern me either, we'll have to go through them to get where we want anyway.

Whomever that 1st round matchup is...get it over with quick.

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:59 am
by Bran Fast Hands
Nuggets need to trade Iggy.

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:01 am
by Thugger HBC
Bran Fast Hands wrote:Nuggets need to trade Iggy.

I honestly dont see why they got involved in that trade.

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:09 am
by Bran Fast Hands
He just doesn't add enough value to that team for 15 mil a year.

Beal definitely has the potential to be a 20+ a game scorer next season. In fact I'm calling it, he averages 21 or higher next season.

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:13 am
by SonOfMars
The Nuggs have a weird team...pretty much all role players, 2nd and 3rd options..mostly 3rd.

They need "THAT" guy

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:21 am
by nitric0
Hey guys
Bulls fan --- I come in peace. I wanted to get your input on Shumpert's first game after h is ACL injury. How was he? How was he moving? Did he seem slower?

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:27 am
by Miked1958
JustCame wrote:Bulls, Pacers, and Nets will win.

Right you are

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:32 am
by Knicks_Fan2
nitric0 wrote:Hey guys
Bulls fan --- I come in peace. I wanted to get your input on Shumpert's first game after h is ACL injury. How was he? How was he moving? Did he seem slower?


He honestly seemed quicker than he did last year and was moving very well--I think most of us were pleasantly surprised. He still obviously needs to get in rhythm and will hopefully just get better and better. I would be extremely optimistic at Rose's recovery after seeing Shumpert's though of course these types of things are idiosyncratic.

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 4:44 am
by blumatic
nitric0 wrote:Hey guys
Bulls fan --- I come in peace. I wanted to get your input on Shumpert's first game after h is ACL injury. How was he? How was he moving? Did he seem slower?


He looked great. Better than last year. Now he was a rookie. But he just looked to strong. So much power.

Rose will be explosive and with him resting the rest of his body from his battered season last year will only help. Now GTFO :D

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:03 am
by AllanHoustonFan
SonOfMars wrote:The Nuggs have a weird team...pretty much all role players, 2nd and 3rd options..mostly 3rd.

They need "THAT" guy

But they're fun to watch :rofl:

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:03 am
by nitric0
Really good to hear, I will be watching some Knicks games for a few weeks just to see how Shumpert plays post injury. Thanks :)

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:03 am
by Tron Carter
Bran Fast Hands wrote:Nuggets need to trade Iggy.


Gallinari too.

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:08 am
by AllanHoustonFan
Damn who is worse on defense: Dirk or STAT?

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:16 am
by Bran Fast Hands
I don't know but watching Durant shoot free throws for tiny amounts of contact is getting annoying to watch this season.

Re: GT: 1/18 (CHI@BOS, HOU@IND, ATL@BKN)

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:24 am
by SonOfMars
Bran Fast Hands OJ Mayo Erection In 5...4...