Chicago and Indiana are better

[PicheDreams]

Boozer Nate robinson and Richard Hamilton are better?..

[23-7]

Huh?

[Nuntius]

If those teams were better, they'd have the better record.

You are what your record says you are.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Do you still hold that point of view?

[Thugger HBC]

If those teams were better, they'd have the better record.

You are what your record says you are.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Do you still hold that point of view?

why wouldn't I? do they both have a better record?

[Nuntius]

If those teams were better, they'd have the better record.

You are what your record says you are.

Sent from my SGH-T999 using Tapatalk 2

Do you still hold that point of view?

why wouldn't I? do they both have a better record?

The Pacers do.

[Thugger HBC]

Played more games too, that's why they have more losses.

[Nuntius]

Played more games too, that's why they have more losses.

So, that means that they will have more rest towards the end of the season

It doesn't change the fact that the Pacers are 13 games over .500 while the Knicks are 12 games over .500

[Thugger HBC]

Fair point, i expect this to contnue all year.

[daschysta]

Records tend to fluctuate. However trends can be telling, Indy started rough, largely because they didn't expect Granger to be out at all, let alone for more than half the season and it took time to adjust, after their 4-7 start they've been elite though. Over the last 44:

SAS 34-10
OKC 32-12
Miami 32-12
LAC 31-13
Indiana 30-14
DEN 29-15
MEM 27-17


NYK- 23-21

Curiously Indy has the 5th best record in the NBA over this period, consistent with their 5th best finish last season. Granger is the X-Factor though, as they had him last year and he hasn't played yet this year.