frogfood wrote:I actually didn't mind Ang Lee's Hulk. At least it tried to be something different; it explored themes ranging from rage to daddy issues. The CGI is wildly outdated though. Hulk fight in the desert owned.
Avenger's era standalones are really superficial. Like, Thor is exactly the same as he was at the beginning of Thor 1!
I don't think I agree with you on that one. Thor in the beginning of Thor 1 was arrogant, spoiled, self interested. I'm not going to call it great drama but his personality changed and that was kind of the whole point of the movie. Tony Stark in Iron Man 1 - same thing. Again, I don't think either film deserves best screenplay, but there was clearly some character development in both.
Hulk 2 was pretty good. I didn't care for Hulk 1 at all.
I think, part of what works about the movies is the kind of "entertain me" factor. Good CGI, good actors and enough of a plot to keep you paying attention. There's also small stuff in the film that's kind of well done. Thor getting drunk with Eric Selvig. That didn't really need to be in the film, and it didn't make all that much sense, why Eric would get drunk with an almost total stranger, but it made enough sense that Eric thought he might be bad for Jane. And it was one of the great 1-2 minutes of the movie, where you see Thor down the entire beer and the next scene he's carrying Eric home over his shoulder saying "We drank, we fought, we made his ancestors proud" - and a scene later he's serving breakfast. I don't know how to explain it, but that's great story telling cause it's fast paced and it tells you a lot in a little bit of time. Thor's a super hero who lost his powers, and still gets drunk with a smile on his face and he'll wear an apron and serve breakfast the next day. He's still hero enough to not get hung over. I'm not saying you have to like it, but lots of hero movies have boring text filler. Thor had a real character in it. Same with Captain America, both films though the 2nd half of the first movie was kind of empty, the first half was very good with good character development. That's why the movies work, cause the little things are done right (well, cept for Thor 2, that was kind of pointless, and Iron man 3 was a overdone), but in general, they're fast paced and there's enough of a story that they work. Guardians was like that, and it was probobly the best of all the movies. It was fast paced and funny and the characters played well off each other.