GONYK wrote:NYKnicksTAPE wrote:GONYK wrote:
That is what I mean as well. Amare played 82 games the season before we got him. Does that mean he was at full strength?
Just because KD plays a full healthy season doesn't mean he will have 4 healthy seasons after that.
It was fully known that Amare's knees were on borrowed time before we got him...it didn't matter if he was playing 82 games or not. KD's risk of re-injuring is very very small after his latest procedure. KD is not nearly the same risk as Amare was
Foot injuries on big men are never really not at a risk of re-injury.
Keep in mind, I'm not saying not to pursue KD. I'm just saying we have no real way of knowing.
I know that you're not saying that we shouldn't pursue KD, and while it is true that we have no real way of knowing because anything can happen, all of the data that is out there shows that KD's risk of re-injury is pretty small. Idk why people keep on bringing up Amare when it was fully known that he was not a good long-term investment. Amare was a true big man who suffered from serious knee problems. KD is a big man in height only...he's not carrying around a ton of weight or taking constant abuse in the paint. Durant fractured his metatarsal...the same thing that happened to Jordan and Pau Gasol. It's not the same injury that guys like Yao or Big Z suffered from (they fractured their navicular bone). After the bone graft procedure, he should be back to normal.
In an article published in the American Journal of Sports Medicine in 2011 looking at bone-grafting procedures performed on re-fractures or non-unions of the fifth metatarsal in 21 elite college and professional athletes, the success rate for return to prior level of competition was 100 percent. At over two years' follow-up, only one athlete had suffered a subsequent re-fracture (the re-fracture was sustained in a motor vehicle accident, not in sports).