spree8 wrote:Nazrmohamed wrote:
Well I don't actually have a problem with Melos contact but it's been a topic of much ire and hate so I brought it up. My gripe isnt with individual moves so much as none of them correlate with each other as part of one big plan. To me to sign Melo must mean you want to win now (ie. Go after marquee talent either around him or even better than him) To rebuild is to do what you described, but not three seasons into the contract, he really should've long convinced Melo by now to waive his ntc or not have given it to him in the first place. If Melo was supposed to be a tradeable asset then why give him a ntc? Why go out and sign Melo friendly players
See? It doesn't add up. I think you gotta admit that your plan was drawn up (if that's even the plan at all) on the fly, only after its obvious his previous plans haven't worked. Nobody at Phil's level ever admits fault, you just spin it like that was the plan all along. We didn't have a failed season last year, we failed on purpose and look it got us KP. We never failed this year to attract free agents, it was always about landing Rolo and Afflalo cause they wanted to be here. We didn't fail this year, it was always about development. This summer, we won't fail to land a top tier free agent, whichever 30 yrs old left over we get it'll be because of his veteran leadership for KP. And on and on.
And I don't mind rebuilding. Id love to contend but if we're gonna rebuild that's ok too. But let's stop with making moves that don't reinforce either. Philly gets bashed but at least everything they do reinforces the plan that they stated was gonna happen. The Grizzlies get bashed but at least every move reinforces that they're trying to contend. We'll talk about rebuilding and then sign Afflalo, trade for Calderon and Sasha. That's my gripe. Go all in on something, make a choice.
I get your point but signing RoLo and Afflalo were hardly to have us compete bro. You really think Phil thought that those two would bring us to the next level? No. They were last resort, and they were cheap and solid. The Jose deal was mainly to get Tyson out.
The thing you aren't connecting here is that with Philly, Hinkie didn't know how to build an actual team. Even while rebuilding you still need to bring in vets to help teach the young guys.
With Melo, Phil didn't wanna lose him for nothing in FA or in a s&t. The no trade clause was likely a demand from Melo because he prob didn't trust Phil. I know some reports say it was Phil's idea, but I doubt it. Even still, I'm sure Phil knew that in a short amount of time Melo would want out...it's obvious. Then we'd be able to get something valuable.
This team never had a chance at contending man. With Tyson quitting, Amare broken, and Melo disgruntled, we had nothing going for us. So making the playoffs from the get go was an impossible task with no real assets to use.
Free agency last year didn't show me that he was really interested in guys like Monroe or Aldridge either. There was really no effort made on his part. That also kinda hints at a true rebuild plan.
So if you really believe that RoLo, Afflalo, Jose and Sasha were brought here to bring us to contention instead of just being spokes on the wheel, then you're mistaken.
Look at all the young rebuilding-type pieces he brought in: Galloway, JGrant, Kris, Early, Thanasis, O'Quinn, DWill, Ledo, Willy, Jimmer, etc..
Let's also not forget that hiring a rookie coach is hardly the way to truly compete. Whether it was Kerr or Fisher, neither one was expected to bring us to the playoffs immediately. Despite Kerr's monumental success in GS.