Sark wrote:Greenie wrote:Rambitch over Fisher?
LOL Phil Jackass
Derek Fisher - 40 W 96 L .295%
Kurt Rambus - 9 W 19 L .321%
The numbers say Rambis is the better coach.
When have I ever cared about numbers when I actually watch the games?
Moderators: dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, GONYK, mpharris36, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully
Sark wrote:Greenie wrote:Rambitch over Fisher?
LOL Phil Jackass
Derek Fisher - 40 W 96 L .295%
Kurt Rambus - 9 W 19 L .321%
The numbers say Rambis is the better coach.
Greenie wrote:Sark wrote:Greenie wrote:Rambitch over Fisher?
LOL Phil Jackass
Derek Fisher - 40 W 96 L .295%
Kurt Rambus - 9 W 19 L .321%
The numbers say Rambis is the better coach.
When have I ever cared about numbers when I actually watch the games?
whocares1 wrote:Greenie wrote:Sark wrote:
Derek Fisher - 40 W 96 L .295%
Kurt Rambus - 9 W 19 L .321%
The numbers say Rambis is the better coach.
When have I ever cared about numbers when I actually watch the games?
I love how he compared a 136 game sample size to a 28 game sample size. I also love how he used Fisher's numbers from last season with a roster where the best player was Langston Galloway, to a roster that still had Melo and Lopez. I just don't understand some people who post here.
whocares1 wrote:Greenie wrote:Sark wrote:
Derek Fisher - 40 W 96 L .295%
Kurt Rambus - 9 W 19 L .321%
The numbers say Rambis is the better coach.
When have I ever cared about numbers when I actually watch the games?
I love how he compared a 136 game sample size to a 28 game sample size. I also love how he used Fisher's numbers from last season with a roster where the best player was Langston Galloway, to a roster that still had Melo and Lopez. I just don't understand some people who post here.
Mr_Perfect wrote:whocares1 wrote:Greenie wrote:When have I ever cared about numbers when I actually watch the games?
I love how he compared a 136 game sample size to a 28 game sample size. I also love how he used Fisher's numbers from last season with a roster where the best player was Langston Galloway, to a roster that still had Melo and Lopez. I just don't understand some people who post here.
BowlRips wrote:http://nyp.st/242Coe9
From Berman
Blatt confidants: Knicks showing some interest, Blatt willing to run triangle
Floozenheimen wrote:Mr_Perfect wrote:nykballa2k4 wrote:
WE HAVE OUR FRIGGEN DRAFT PICKS.
Even if Phil signs nobody, and wheels out Rambis for another season, WE ARE BETTER OFF THAN BEFORE HE GOT HERE. I wish you could go back to the IT years, and just re-live that for a moment. In those days, EVERY POSITION was a problem. We had a FAT no-defense center. We had Avi Lee, we had Tiny Tim Thomas. We had .... piles and piles of useless trash. Nothing resembling a franchise talent, nothing resembling a competitive team. Right now, we can reasonably say adding Rondo and a coach makes us good. Melo-KP-Rolo. We are MUCH better than we were last year. No JR. No headcases. Only "bad contract" is Jose Calderon who expires in time for us to sign Westbrook.
With IT, almost EVERY PLAYER was a bad contract. Curry, Jerome James, Jared Jeffries, Malik Rose, Maurice Taylor, at the time people were complaining about Zach Randolph.... QBrick. I mean, the list goes on.
What a revelation.
Comparing anyone to one of the worst GM's in sports history will make them look good.
That is such baloney. Any run of the mill GM can't work for the Knicks, simply because Dolan will meddle. Force us to trade our youth and picks for old crap with bloated salaries. You assume that the GM of the Celtics or a guy like SVG could come here and do as they please with Dolan sitting on his hands.
With Phil, Dolan has enough respect for the guy to let him build the team in his vision. So far, I'm okay with the process. PROCESS, a word Phil used to describe what he planned on doing here when he was hired. He was not in a rush to return us to the treadmill nor was he about sacrificing our future to gain a few more wins in the short term. Things, I myself as a fan, am absolutely 100% behind. Add to the fact that he wants to emulate the Spurs, something else he said, and I'm sold. He wants a team first group of guys that are fundamentally sound without egos or other problems.
I say we give the guy his time to do what he plans, and then when the dust settles we can evaluate him. To do so now is unfair and typical of an ignorant, demanding and impatient NY sports fan. I will reserve my judgement until 2018. Crazy right? I'm being patient. Unheard of.
BowlRips wrote:http://nyp.st/242Coe9
From Berman
Blatt confidants: Knicks showing some interest, Blatt willing to run triangle
BowlRips wrote:http://nyp.st/242Coe9
From Berman
Blatt confidants: Knicks showing some interest, Blatt willing to run triangle
Triple C wrote:BowlRips wrote:http://nyp.st/242Coe9
From Berman
Blatt confidants: Knicks showing some interest, Blatt willing to run triangle
Blatt HC and Rambis offensive cordinator, create some hybrid triangle-princeton offense. Better Blatt with Rambis than Rambis alone
xNewYorkMadex wrote:Still think this supposed interest in Blatt is just Mills trying to get his guy interviewed. Dont believe Blatt is a serious candidate at all. I wouldnt mind Blatt, but I want him to coach his own way. Got his team 2 wins away from a title last year. Won a number of titles overseas. Let him do his thing.
But Phil's heart is with the system. His heart is with Rambis, Shaw or Walton running the triangle he wants. Blatt in my opinion, is 4th in that race.
thebuzzardman wrote:xNewYorkMadex wrote:Still think this supposed interest in Blatt is just Mills trying to get his guy interviewed. Dont believe Blatt is a serious candidate at all. I wouldnt mind Blatt, but I want him to coach his own way. Got his team 2 wins away from a title last year. Won a number of titles overseas. Let him do his thing.
But Phil's heart is with the system. His heart is with Rambis, Shaw or Walton running the triangle he wants. Blatt in my opinion, is 4th in that race.
What's the point of hiring Blatt, where one of the things that makes him good is his variation on the Princeton offense, and then force him to run the strict triangle? I mean, I realize that in certain sets/situations the Princeton and triangle aren't miles apart, but then again, in other ways they are pretty different. I'm no coaching or NBA plays expert - this is based on watching breakdowns of the two offenses.