Amsterdam wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:As long as Phil cant affect the Knicks value, Dolan wont have any issues. Phil is no different than any other big name that Dolan has hired before, other than being least experienced in the position than all of the rest.
You know Bro, put it this way. Phil Jackson is my obvious choice to lead this team out the circus we've had for years and years. But that's me.
And that's fine, you're entitled to that. I don't think Phil has shown he can do those things. I see a similar circus coupled with lots of losing.
But that's just me.
Amsterdam wrote:Why don't you give me a name for a President of Basketball Ops and who wants to deal with the most critical and vicious fanbase and media in all of sports not soccer.
I'll do you one better. I know a coach that wants the job of coach AND would gladly take on the dual role. Kill two birds with one stone.
Amsterdam wrote:Even the great Jeff VanGundy walked away mid season. Legendary Pat Riley left after a blown Finals as to not deal with what was awaiting him back here. Left for a less pressure environment in Miami.
I see the issue here, you really don't know what happened. JVG admitted he made a mistake and has done everything to reconcile, and has never bad mouthed Dolan, even called him a good owner to work for. Has any exec badmouthed Dolan? Pat Riley wanted what the Knicks couldn't give...primarily ownership.
Riley had no issues with the Knicks, no need to make things up. Riley wanted to revolutionize the game, he wanted more than what coaches normally were given. Riley already had roster control, that's how Mase and Starks were brought in and I think Bonner as well.
He got everything he waned in Miami.
Amsterdam wrote:Joe Torre was regularly questioned at the end.
Derek Jeter rarely if ever spoke to the media.
Pat Ewing was vilified regularly.
You're gonna be questioned when you lose, not sure why you see an issue with that.
Do you honestly think a team that has lost over 100 games under your tenure shouldn't be questioned at all?
The Yankees started to lose their championship dominance, if you aren't winning anymore people are gonna talk. Jeter had no reason to address the media...he did it with his play. Jeter's leadership nor production ever have been questioned because he always performed.
Amsterdam wrote:That you are throwing sht on Phil Jackson is nothing new, just more current but the same ole same ole fan drama.
Phil is throwing it on himself. I haven't racked up 100+ losses. I'm not searching for a third HC in two years. I didnt assemble the worst backcourt in the NBA. This team is 100% Phil. You cats act like Phil is on the stake like a martyr who did no wrong.
Has he been a complete failure? Certainly not. But this notion that Phil has done great and is above criticism is ridiculous.
Winning silences all. Phil knows this better than anyone. Once that happens, talk will die down naturally.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20
Gone, but will never be forgotten