ImageImageImageImageImage

It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag

Moderators: dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, GONYK, mpharris36, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully

User avatar
DaGawd
RealGM
Posts: 33,906
And1: 43,902
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
Location: Queens, NY
     

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#101 » by DaGawd » Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:16 am

Greenie wrote:
DaGawd wrote:
Greenie wrote:If Wade wanted to come here he could have come here. Stars ain't fuqing with us. We will need to constantly overpay good players.

Or build thru draft?

sure. Pray we don't end up like Orlando or PHX or Sac and so on

They're still searching for a prospect the level of KP. We have that... the hardest part. Now just let the growth around him happen organically with young players.
BaF
Washington Wizards
NYKMentality85
Analyst
Posts: 3,102
And1: 1,204
Joined: Feb 10, 2013

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#102 » by NYKMentality85 » Fri Nov 25, 2016 10:36 am

DaGawd wrote:
Greenie wrote:
DaGawd wrote:Or build thru draft?

sure. Pray we don't end up like Orlando or PHX or Sac and so on

They're still searching for a prospect the level of KP. We have that... the hardest part. Now just let the growth around him happen organically with young players.


Exactly DaGawd, exactly.

You can use San Antonio as a prime example. After the drafting of a cornerstone big man in Tim Duncan back in 1997, they drafted Manu Ginobili two years later (2nd round, 57th overall, 1999). Two years after the drafting of Manu they selected Tony Parker (1st round, 28th overall, 2001). And the rest way history (all while David Robinson played until 2003).

We've finally landed our franchise player in Porzingis and as San Antonio had a veteran leader in Robinson to help mold their prized possession in Duncan, New York has an NBA future 1st ballot Hall of Famer in Anthony to help mold our great hope in Porzingis.

There are fans out there that believe the trio of Parker, Ginobili and Duncan "happened over night". In which it didn't. It took time, patience & great front office scouting.

Phil Jackson has both of Porzingis & Anthony at his disposal as did San Antonio with Duncan & Robinson. Now it's time for Phil Jackson to surround this duo with talented Free Agents & come up big with marque draft picks (the Manu's & Parker's do exist within the draft).
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#103 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Fri Nov 25, 2016 11:41 am

DaGawd wrote:
Greenie wrote:
DaGawd wrote:Or build thru draft?

sure. Pray we don't end up like Orlando or PHX or Sac and so on

They're still searching for a prospect the level of KP. We have that... the hardest part. Now just let the growth around him happen organically with young players.

I think Phoenix actually has the guy in Booker. Chriss looks interesting, but Bender looks like a potential DPOY candidate. The issue is the rest of the team and the way they (foolishly) put it together. Instead of trying to tank hard, they're keeping their guys they could get value for...which will get them wins, but lose them ping pong balls. Sound familiar? :lol:
User avatar
DaGawd
RealGM
Posts: 33,906
And1: 43,902
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
Location: Queens, NY
     

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#104 » by DaGawd » Fri Nov 25, 2016 12:00 pm

Knickstape1214 wrote:
DaGawd wrote:
Greenie wrote:sure. Pray we don't end up like Orlando or PHX or Sac and so on

They're still searching for a prospect the level of KP. We have that... the hardest part. Now just let the growth around him happen organically with young players.

I think Phoenix actually has the guy in Booker. Chriss looks interesting, but Bender looks like a potential DPOY candidate. The issue is the rest of the team and the way they (foolishly) put it together. Instead of trying to tank hard, they're keeping their guys they could get value for...which will get them wins, but lose them ping pong balls. Sound familiar? :lol:

All too familiar :oops:
BaF
Washington Wizards
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 27,425
And1: 24,957
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#105 » by Jeff Van Gully » Fri Nov 25, 2016 1:36 pm

Iron Mantis wrote:
echelonNYK wrote:
Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Why wasn't Porzingis invited? :noway:

dem boys & gals look lit. :lol:


look like that holiday blunt went around. they must not random test over the holidays.
RIP magnumt

welcome home, thibs.
Greenie
RealGM
Posts: 58,966
And1: 30,697
Joined: Feb 25, 2010

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#106 » by Greenie » Fri Nov 25, 2016 1:43 pm

DaGawd wrote:
Greenie wrote:
DaGawd wrote:Or build thru draft?

sure. Pray we don't end up like Orlando or PHX or Sac and so on

They're still searching for a prospect the level of KP. We have that... the hardest part. Now just let the growth around him happen organically with young players.

Go tell AD that.
I don't care either way. At the end of the day, KP is the dude so he'll have to carry the team.
Greenie
RealGM
Posts: 58,966
And1: 30,697
Joined: Feb 25, 2010

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#107 » by Greenie » Fri Nov 25, 2016 1:50 pm

Knickstape1214 wrote:
DaGawd wrote:
Greenie wrote:sure. Pray we don't end up like Orlando or PHX or Sac and so on

They're still searching for a prospect the level of KP. We have that... the hardest part. Now just let the growth around him happen organically with young players.

I think Phoenix actually has the guy in Booker. Chriss looks interesting, but Bender looks like a potential DPOY candidate. The issue is the rest of the team and the way they (foolishly) put it together. Instead of trying to tank hard, they're keeping their guys they could get value for...which will get them wins, but lose them ping pong balls. Sound familiar? :lol:

Tank Hard? They've been in the lotto since Nash left. How much harder can one tank?

We can get rid of Melo. Fine. But if we are having more years like that 17 win year and KP is leading us(outside of him being hurt) then is he the dude we should be building around?

Our tanks will(or should) look more like the Pelicans if KP is a franchise player. We should hover around 30 wins a year. In other words more like the 8-12 pick.
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 133,395
And1: 126,924
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#108 » by god shammgod » Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:26 pm

so did d.rose bring a mac and cheese ? a patti's sweet potato pie ? something ?
User avatar
AmazingJason
RealGM
Posts: 15,179
And1: 6,142
Joined: Aug 07, 2006
Location: NYC
   

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#109 » by AmazingJason » Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:33 pm

god shammgod wrote:so did d.rose bring a mac and cheese ? a patti's sweet potato pie ? something ?


Yes, like Rose said, a healthy appetite :D
BAT 18.0 - MINNESOTA TIMBERWOLVES

El Poochio - POBO
Amazing Jason - Assistant to the VPOBO

PG: Lonzo Ball/Dennis Smith Jr.
SG: Donovan Mitchell/R. McGruder
SF: Jaylen Brown/Josh Jackson
PF: Jayson Tatum/T. Booker
C: Joel Embiid/McGee
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#110 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:40 pm

Greenie wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
DaGawd wrote:They're still searching for a prospect the level of KP. We have that... the hardest part. Now just let the growth around him happen organically with young players.

I think Phoenix actually has the guy in Booker. Chriss looks interesting, but Bender looks like a potential DPOY candidate. The issue is the rest of the team and the way they (foolishly) put it together. Instead of trying to tank hard, they're keeping their guys they could get value for...which will get them wins, but lose them ping pong balls. Sound familiar? :lol:

Tank Hard? They've been in the lotto since Nash left. How much harder can one tank?

We can get rid of Melo. Fine. But if we are having more years like that 17 win year and KP is leading us(outside of him being hurt) then is he the dude we should be building around?

Our tanks will(or should) look more like the Pelicans if KP is a franchise player. We should hover around 30 wins a year. In other words more like the 8-12 pick.


They've been in the lotto but never drafted anything in the top 4 (besides last year?) because they keep signing vets.

30 ish wins keeps us outside the top 5 but only by a small amount.
Greenie
RealGM
Posts: 58,966
And1: 30,697
Joined: Feb 25, 2010

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#111 » by Greenie » Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:55 pm

Knickstape1214 wrote:
Greenie wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:I think Phoenix actually has the guy in Booker. Chriss looks interesting, but Bender looks like a potential DPOY candidate. The issue is the rest of the team and the way they (foolishly) put it together. Instead of trying to tank hard, they're keeping their guys they could get value for...which will get them wins, but lose them ping pong balls. Sound familiar? :lol:

Tank Hard? They've been in the lotto since Nash left. How much harder can one tank?

We can get rid of Melo. Fine. But if we are having more years like that 17 win year and KP is leading us(outside of him being hurt) then is he the dude we should be building around?

Our tanks will(or should) look more like the Pelicans if KP is a franchise player. We should hover around 30 wins a year. In other words more like the 8-12 pick.


They've been in the lotto but never drafted anything in the top 4 (besides last year?) because they keep signing vets.

30 ish wins keeps us outside the top 5 but only by a small amount.

Nope. We had the 9th or 10th(can't remember where Toronto picked) pick this past year. Denver didn't flip. We won 32 games. If KP is a franchise player then by his lonesome we should hover there. We will never get that top 3 pick. You're looking at mid to late lotto. That's the tank. How is that different from what this team was before 2010? Frye, Hill, Gallo...that's the mid round lotto picks.
Greenie
RealGM
Posts: 58,966
And1: 30,697
Joined: Feb 25, 2010

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#112 » by Greenie » Fri Nov 25, 2016 3:01 pm

The purpose of the tank people want is to get a top 4(really top 3) pick.

If KP is a franchise player that's not happening unless he gets hurt.
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#113 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Fri Nov 25, 2016 3:04 pm

Greenie wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
Greenie wrote:Tank Hard? They've been in the lotto since Nash left. How much harder can one tank?

We can get rid of Melo. Fine. But if we are having more years like that 17 win year and KP is leading us(outside of him being hurt) then is he the dude we should be building around?

Our tanks will(or should) look more like the Pelicans if KP is a franchise player. We should hover around 30 wins a year. In other words more like the 8-12 pick.


They've been in the lotto but never drafted anything in the top 4 (besides last year?) because they keep signing vets.

30 ish wins keeps us outside the top 5 but only by a small amount.

Nope. We had the 9th or 10th(can't remember where Toronto picked) pick this past year. Denver didn't flip. We won 32 games. If KP is a franchise player then by his lonesome we should hover there. We will never get that top 3 pick. You're looking at mid to late lotto. That's the tank. How is that different from what this team was before 2010? Frye, Hill, Gallo...that's the mid round lotto picks.

Yep. I said 30 wins, not around 30 like you said. 30 wins puts us 6th (1 game behind 29th which was 5th worst). Even though 6th is not as good as top 4, it's still significantly better than 12-14, which is where we currently are.

Also, how is this imaginary/projected team different from the 2010 team...You're joking, right? You might not be willing to admit it, but KP is a centerpiece of the team going forward and is easily the best young player we've had to build around since Ewing. That is how it's different from what the team was before 2010.
Greenie
RealGM
Posts: 58,966
And1: 30,697
Joined: Feb 25, 2010

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#114 » by Greenie » Fri Nov 25, 2016 3:39 pm

Knickstape1214 wrote:
Greenie wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
They've been in the lotto but never drafted anything in the top 4 (besides last year?) because they keep signing vets.

30 ish wins keeps us outside the top 5 but only by a small amount.

Nope. We had the 9th or 10th(can't remember where Toronto picked) pick this past year. Denver didn't flip. We won 32 games. If KP is a franchise player then by his lonesome we should hover there. We will never get that top 3 pick. You're looking at mid to late lotto. That's the tank. How is that different from what this team was before 2010? Frye, Hill, Gallo...that's the mid round lotto picks.

Yep. I said 30 wins, not around 30 like you said. 30 wins puts us 6th (1 game behind 29th which was 5th worst). Even though 6th is not as good as top 4, it's still significantly better than 12-14, which is where we currently are.

Also, how is this imaginary/projected team different from the 2010 team...You're joking, right? You might not be willing to admit it, but KP is a centerpiece of the team going forward and is easily the best young player we've had to build around since Ewing. That is how it's different from what the team was before 2010.


Around 30 wins is what we were last year.

The "How is it different" comment is strictly speaking on our drafting position(that's why I named players) if we are 30 ish (something like last year) win team.
User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 84,066
And1: 119,386
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#115 » by 3toheadmelo » Fri Nov 25, 2016 3:47 pm

Make the playoffs then go hard after Chris Paul. Jrue holiday is the backup plan. By then porzingis is gonna be super fawking good, melo should still be elite, Chris Paul still a top 5 pg. We would be scary good
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
ctorres
RealGM
Posts: 15,606
And1: 3,563
Joined: Jun 04, 2005

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#116 » by ctorres » Fri Nov 25, 2016 3:51 pm

echelonNYK wrote:
Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Why wasn't Porzingis invited? :noway:


If we hadn't signed Lee and Noah, we would have had the money to sign Wade and he would be spending Christmas right now with his teammates.
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 133,395
And1: 126,924
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#117 » by god shammgod » Fri Nov 25, 2016 3:55 pm

the clippers are looking better then ever. he's not leaving.
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#118 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Fri Nov 25, 2016 3:55 pm

Greenie wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
Greenie wrote:Nope. We had the 9th or 10th(can't remember where Toronto picked) pick this past year. Denver didn't flip. We won 32 games. If KP is a franchise player then by his lonesome we should hover there. We will never get that top 3 pick. You're looking at mid to late lotto. That's the tank. How is that different from what this team was before 2010? Frye, Hill, Gallo...that's the mid round lotto picks.

Yep. I said 30 wins, not around 30 like you said. 30 wins puts us 6th (1 game behind 29th which was 5th worst). Even though 6th is not as good as top 4, it's still significantly better than 12-14, which is where we currently are.

Also, how is this imaginary/projected team different from the 2010 team...You're joking, right? You might not be willing to admit it, but KP is a centerpiece of the team going forward and is easily the best young player we've had to build around since Ewing. That is how it's different from what the team was before 2010.


Around 30 wins is what we were last year.

The "How is it different" comment is strictly speaking on our drafting position(that's why I named players) if we are 30 ish (something like last year) win team.


But around 30 wins is not 30 wins. Drafting 6th gives us a chance of getting a better player than drafting 8 or 9 does. If you don't understand that, which is my point, this really is going nowhere. BTW, drafting 6th in the Hill draft gets us Curry. Drafting 8th in Gallo's draft (which is where "around" 30 games would get us that year) would put us in prime position to draft...Joe Alexander! Yay! The 2005 draft was garbage as is, but 6th puts us only 2 spots away from CP3 making it somewhat easier to trade for him (theoretically speaking).

Even if we were "around" 30 wins, that's still significantly better than being at 40 wins or making the playoffs and being swept in the first round. Why? Because we're putting ourselves in a better position to draft a high level player.

You and I clearly are not seeing eye to eye on this (maybe something is being lost in the messages, IDK), so I'm bowing out. Not sure there's anything else for me to say on this.
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 133,395
And1: 126,924
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#119 » by god shammgod » Fri Nov 25, 2016 3:56 pm

ctorres wrote:
echelonNYK wrote:
Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Why wasn't Porzingis invited? :noway:


If we hadn't signed Lee and Noah, we would have had the money to sign Wade and he would be spending Christmas right now with his teammates.


yeah. had the same thought when i saw that photo. oh well.
Knicksfan1992
RealGM
Posts: 13,613
And1: 13,707
Joined: Jun 14, 2012
         

Re: It's official: Derrick Rose is a scumbag 

Post#120 » by Knicksfan1992 » Fri Nov 25, 2016 4:00 pm

ctorres wrote:
echelonNYK wrote:
Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter


Why wasn't Porzingis invited? :noway:


If we hadn't signed Lee and Noah, we would have had the money to sign Wade and he would be spending Christmas right now with his teammates.


You don't think the front office knew this though? We couldn't gamble on waiting on Wade if we wanted to be competitive this year. Especially since he took long to make his decision and, in general, the consensus was he would stay in Miami. We had to lock up guys early. Chicago was planning on rebuilding so, they could afford to wait it out since if he ended up spurning them they would just go back to their original plan.

Now you can criticize Phil for not leaving the rebuilding option open which would have given us the flexibility to wait out a Wade negotiation. That's fair game but, I don't think Wade not coming here is as simple as we chose Noah and Lee over him. I'm sure if Phil knew that Wade was 100% sure or even 75% sure he would leave MIA he would have picked Wade over those 2 or at least over one of them.

Return to New York Knicks