Handledatruth wrote:swisscheeseD wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:I would love to find a way to get Ingram from the Lakers....would even take back Deng's contract to do it. Worth the risk imo.
Otherwise I'm down for 2 unprotected future picks and filler from the Clippers. Unless another team has a better offer.
You're not getting Ingram from L.A, and I highly doubt you're getting Russell.
The best and most reasonable deal I can see being had with the Lakers that all sides would sign off on is...
We7o for Julius Randle, Luol Deng's contract and Hou 2017 1st (#28)
Depends on whether or not they lose their pick. Top 3 pick gets them a choice of either Fultz, Ball, or Josh Jackson rendering either Ingram or Russell as redundant young players. I mean I guess they can look for other takers, but they are going to have to give up one of those guys sooner or later. Now if they lose their draft pick, that's a different convo.
Ball makes neither Russell or Ingram redundant; and is the most likeliest of the 3 to end up in L.A. Even if Fultz ends up being the selection, they could look to move Russell, but in that event, it will be in a package that nets a better player over a larger window than Me7o. Same with Ingram should they select JJackson.
Paul George is their main prize, whether by trade, or preferably by Free Agency. They need to make themselves an attractive situation, but also free up cap flexibility to make it happen. They have a decision to make on Julius Randle with an extension looming. He is the likeliest of the Lakers prospects to be moved due to their financial situation. They DO NOT "have to give up one of those guys (Russell or Ingram) sooner or later", they'd still be under contract on the rookie scale at the time of PG's Free Agency. Another reason why Randle is the guy to shed Deng/Mozgov (or at least turn them into an upgrade or shorter contracts).