Rotation
Moderators: dakomish23, Capn'O, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, GONYK, mpharris36, HerSports85, Jeff Van Gully
Rotation
-
- Senior
- Posts: 621
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 22, 2006
Rotation
Zach**/ Eddy
Lee/ Gallo
Chandler/ Balkman/ Collins*
Crawford/ Q Rich
Duhon/ Nate
*I think we should try Collins as a SF, that way he can use his quickness to get to the rim, and passing ability is just an added bonus
** Zach at Center, He rebounds, can shoot, and is quicker than most centers in the league
Lee/ Gallo
Chandler/ Balkman/ Collins*
Crawford/ Q Rich
Duhon/ Nate
*I think we should try Collins as a SF, that way he can use his quickness to get to the rim, and passing ability is just an added bonus
** Zach at Center, He rebounds, can shoot, and is quicker than most centers in the league
Re: Rotation
- knick4life1218
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,835
- And1: 0
- Joined: Oct 27, 2006
- Location: NY CiTY
Re: Rotation
this is probably the lineup that we will use, but i still think marbury will run the floor for at least a few weeks into the season....
Re: Rotation
- Remember the Past
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,217
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 14, 2006
- Location: Screw Wes and LeDiva. Keep Lee. Trust Donnie. Give the Rookies a chance.
Re: Rotation
Duhon/nate
Crawford/Q-brick
Chandler/Jeffries/balkman
Gallo/Jeffries
Curry/someone
Crawford/Q-brick
Chandler/Jeffries/balkman
Gallo/Jeffries
Curry/someone
Re: Rotation
- Red Vines
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,509
- And1: 8,575
- Joined: Jun 26, 2005
- Location: On Charlie V's toilet.
Re: Rotation
Cut1er wrote:Zach**/ Eddy
Lee/ Gallo
Chandler/ Balkman/ Collins*
Crawford/ Q Rich
Duhon/ Nate
Yeah, this is tricky, I can't see us going with Zach AND Eddy on the floor at the same time given D'Ant wants to run & gun...I can definitely see him going with a Lee/Zach frontcourt until we revamp those positions through some trades.
Re: Rotation
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,946
- And1: 9,443
- Joined: Jul 23, 2003
- Location: Winning now since 1973
- Contact:
Re: Rotation
It's so obvious:
5. Balkman
4. Gallinari
3. Chandler
2. Nate
1. Crawford
--
6. Lee
7. Duhon
8. Roberson
9. Rose
Anybody can see that.
5. Balkman
4. Gallinari
3. Chandler
2. Nate
1. Crawford
--
6. Lee
7. Duhon
8. Roberson
9. Rose
Anybody can see that.
Re: Rotation
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,946
- And1: 9,443
- Joined: Jul 23, 2003
- Location: Winning now since 1973
- Contact:
Re: Rotation
Or the "100 FGA/Game just for the starting five" lineup:
5. Curry
4. Randolph
3. Richardson
2. Crawford
1. Marbury
---
6. Lee
7. Duhon
8. Robinson
9. Chandler
5. Curry
4. Randolph
3. Richardson
2. Crawford
1. Marbury
---
6. Lee
7. Duhon
8. Robinson
9. Chandler
Re: Rotation
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,946
- And1: 9,443
- Joined: Jul 23, 2003
- Location: Winning now since 1973
- Contact:
Re: Rotation
Anything but the Larry Brown "no set rotation for the whole season" lineup is fine with me.
Re: Rotation
- mjhp911
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 29,886
- And1: 14
- Joined: Aug 12, 2002
- Location: New York
Re: Rotation
If it were up to me, I'd go this way...
Randolph
Gallo
Chandler
JC
Du-du
With Nate, Lee, Taz, and maybe some JSlim off the bench. Mardy gets some minutes sprinkled here and there. No Q, Marb, and Curry for me.
But knowing our organization, it's probably going to go like this...
Curry
Randolph
Chandler
JC
Du-du
With Nate, Gallo, Lee, Q, and possibly some Taz and JSlim off the bench.
Randolph
Gallo
Chandler
JC
Du-du
With Nate, Lee, Taz, and maybe some JSlim off the bench. Mardy gets some minutes sprinkled here and there. No Q, Marb, and Curry for me.
But knowing our organization, it's probably going to go like this...
Curry
Randolph
Chandler
JC
Du-du
With Nate, Gallo, Lee, Q, and possibly some Taz and JSlim off the bench.
Re: Rotation
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,416
- And1: 6
- Joined: Jul 26, 2006
Re: Rotation
Do you guys really think Chandler will start? or is it wishful thinking?
Re: Rotation
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 9,027
- And1: 4
- Joined: Jun 15, 2008
Re: Rotation
If it were up to me
C-Curry/Lee/Jeffries
Pf-Zach/Lee/Gallo
Sf-Chandler/Qrich/Balkman
Sg-Craw/Qrich/Roberson
Pg-Duhon/Nate/Collins
C-Curry/Lee/Jeffries
Pf-Zach/Lee/Gallo
Sf-Chandler/Qrich/Balkman
Sg-Craw/Qrich/Roberson
Pg-Duhon/Nate/Collins
Re: Rotation
- Fat Kat
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,152
- And1: 29,126
- Joined: Apr 19, 2004
Re: Rotation
-Ducky- wrote:Do you guys really think Chandler will start? or is it wishful thinking?
Very wishful thinking. Q, IMO will get the start, but hopefully Wilson destroys him in training camp, forcing MikeD's hand.
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
Re: Rotation
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 21,946
- And1: 9,443
- Joined: Jul 23, 2003
- Location: Winning now since 1973
- Contact:
Re: Rotation
mjhp911 wrote:If it were up to me, I'd go this way...
Randolph
Gallo
Chandler
JC
Du-du
With Nate, Lee, Taz, and maybe some JSlim off the bench. Mardy gets some minutes sprinkled here and there. No Q, Marb, and Curry for me.
But knowing our organization, it's probably going to go like this...
Curry
Randolph
Chandler
JC
Du-du
With Nate, Gallo, Lee, Q, and possibly some Taz and JSlim off the bench.
Gallo would get destroyed if he started at PF this year. Then he'd be run out of town by angry mobs of New Yorkers.
In all seriousness, if it were up to me, I'd reluctantly start Balkman at the 4 because he's our only athletic big man with any hopes of blocking a shot. I would not play Randolph and Curry at the same time. Give Zach 30 minutes and EC 18.
5. Randolph/Curry
4. Balkman/Lee
3. Chandler/Gallinari
2. Crawford/Nate
1. Duhon/Crawford
Re: Rotation
- Fat Kat
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,152
- And1: 29,126
- Joined: Apr 19, 2004
Re: Rotation
My line-up would be
C-Zach/Lee
Pf-Lee/Gallo/Balkman
Sf-Chandler/Balkman/Collins
Sg-Jamal/Nate/Roberson
Pg-Duhon/Jamal/Nate
No Q, no JJ, no Curry.
C-Zach/Lee
Pf-Lee/Gallo/Balkman
Sf-Chandler/Balkman/Collins
Sg-Jamal/Nate/Roberson
Pg-Duhon/Jamal/Nate
No Q, no JJ, no Curry.
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
Re: Rotation
- TKKnicks1
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,264
- And1: 2,491
- Joined: Jun 28, 2002
- Location: Dallas
Re: Rotation
cgmw wrote:mjhp911 wrote:
5. Randolph/Curry
4. Balkman/Lee
3. Chandler/Gallinari
2. Crawford/Nate
1. Duhon/Crawford
I like this lineup and would love to see it used this season.
~I Believe!~
Re: Rotation
- TwelvePac
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,748
- And1: 12
- Joined: May 01, 2006
Re: Rotation
Duhon
Crawford
Chandler
Zach/Jeffries (C,PF depending on matchup)
Crawford
Chandler
Zach/Jeffries (C,PF depending on matchup)
Re: Rotation
-
- Senior
- Posts: 532
- And1: 82
- Joined: Sep 24, 2005
- Location: Rockville, MD
Re: Rotation
Wow! With all that uncertain rotation speculation, and changes to the line-up more varied than every twist of a kaleidoscope, it is plain to see that the only thing the Knicks are set to do this upcoming season, is Tank early and tank fast.
WTF, D'Antoni has to have a grace year. Most playoff teams, tweak here and there or do a block buster deal that puts them over the top. As much as I would like, as a long suffering Knicks fans who has the ignominy of being from NY (the Mecca of BBall) with a team which has sucked with endurance, the Knicks can do neither. I'll be saving my "Knick" dollars this year.
WTF, D'Antoni has to have a grace year. Most playoff teams, tweak here and there or do a block buster deal that puts them over the top. As much as I would like, as a long suffering Knicks fans who has the ignominy of being from NY (the Mecca of BBall) with a team which has sucked with endurance, the Knicks can do neither. I'll be saving my "Knick" dollars this year.