onlyonesharky wrote:First of all, you don't know me to state whether something would make a difference or not.
OK. You had 2 contradictory statements in the same post.
onlyonesharky wrote:The point is that he was not willing to play the backup role for the Knicks without a fiasco/issue/problem/crybabyism/immaturity/bull#$#%#/DomeDumbness/ but he is willing to play backup for the Celtics? What's the difference this upcoming season:
1. Contract year?
2. New coach?
3. If he gets traded to a Championship team he would be willing to play backup?
First you go on a tirade of the issues Marbury would surely cause as a backup (indicating you don't believe he'd be anything but a "fiasco/issue/problem/crybabyism/immaturity/bull#$#%#/DomeDumbness") then....
onlyonesharky wrote:*He didn't even volunteer to play backup for the Knicks. If he wanted to prove a point, he should have stated that at least.
...you seem offended that he didn't even offer to provide his "fiasco/issue/problem/crybabyism/immaturity/bull#$#%#/DomeDumbness" backup services. That's a serious opinion to form because a player didn't volunteer to play backup. Besides, what difference does it make? Crawford said he feels he should be starting. Q has been quoted last season "I don't know why everyone is penciling me in to come off the bench. I intend to start." It's silly not to expect the same of everyone.
I don't claim to know you but if you're expecting some indication he wants to try and make it work you may want to, at minimum, free yourself of the preconceived opinions, eh.
Like this...
onlyonesharky wrote:How many more years do you need for Marbury to continue to spread his sourpuss big domeheaded nonsense holier than thou and pushing everything over to the "I have found an inner peace..." crap. Give me a break.
And this...
onlyonesharky wrote:The guy is a big time pot head who tries to intimidate his own teammates and his only loyalty is to himself.
Yup. You sure seem as if "I will come off the bench" would make all the difference in the world. Glad you gave him a chance.
onlyonesharky wrote:But he has never accepted any...ANY blame whatsoever for the losing. He should speak as a Captain and state, "this year will be different than any other.
Who has? Not a single player has taken responsibility yet we still focus on Marbury.
Has Curry taken responsibility for coming out of shape and being the epitome of someone who only cares about himself and doesn't care to help his teammates (see his rebounding, defense and "help" defense)?
Has Q taken responsibility for coming out of shape OR "Marburying" Isiah on National TV. Yeah, I noticed how quickly everyone cleansed themselves of when "leader" of the team was fat and insubordinate - but he's OK right. Marbury's fault.
Zach and Nate scuffle? Can I get a link to them taking responsibility for something? Anything?
Crawford has, as usual, addressed his faults but they're starting to sound like total BS and 8 years in with no playoff appearances makes me think he's not really taking responsibilty.
Yeah, I don't care whether Marbury takes responsibility publicly for anything since it's not expected from anyone else, further proving people make WAY TOO MUCH of Marbury.
onlyonesharky wrote:I am not only going to lead this team by example but by my words of leadership. I will be an extension of the coach, an extension of true New Yorkers who want to get back to winning. A true champion in every sense of the word.
That sh*t is corny and NO ONE would believe him after his wacky interviews. We need to stop creating these fantasy statements or ideal interviews for Marbury. Either you like him and you will give him a chance or you hate him and nothing he says matters. There is VERY rarely an in between.
onlyonesharky wrote:There were some things that were not my fault but there were also things that were my fault for our losing.
I want everyone to publicly say that. However, since they won't I will not sit at the edge of my seat waiting for those words from Marbury.
onlyonesharky wrote:This year I will not be either the scapegoat
In the past it was not up to him and I suspect this season would be no different when Hahn, Isola, etc lurking around every corner.
onlyonesharky wrote:because I will be the reason the team stays together and not one of the reasons this team splits up into cliques...etc. etc..."
Isiah did that. It's called the Jamal Crawford game (similar to the Kevin Bacon game but less consistent). Curry, Nate and Q-Rich (3 guys who have publicly received the most leeway) can all be traced back to Jamal and I suspect they stick together more than any other group on the roster.
Those last 70 seconds, Randle in a nut shell.
Awful 2 for 1 3PT attempt when we are up 2
Doesn’t close out on Sabonis --> open 3
Takes another side step off balance 3
We got sucked into the Randle vortex where all good feelings go to die.
Buttah304