OT:Kings vets prank rookie Jason Thompson

ITGM · Post #1 » by **ITGM** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 4:08 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKP-ysd4VEU

Rolf :lol:

Spencer Hawes loves his bagels...

method · Post #2 » by **method** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 4:20 am

I tought they said he was traded to the Knicks as the prank.

blueNorange · Post #3 » by **blueNorange** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 4:21 am

kings are a bad team but yet they're all having fun and have a very young core to build around with spencer hawes, jason thompson, and kevin martin.

the knicks are the most doomed team in the nba.

Da_Mane_Man · Post #4 » by **Da_Mane_Man** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 4:35 am

yea, the kings are waaaayyy above us in terms of young talent :roll:

blueNorange · Post #5 » by **blueNorange** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 4:38 am

Da_Mane_Man wrote:yea, the kings are waaaayyy above us in terms of young talent

c - spencer hawes
pf - jason thompson
sg - kevin martin

the knicks don't have anyone ... gallinari is a question mark although he has great potential and chandler will most likely be a decent defensive player with a respectable mid range game.

Da_Mane_Man · Post #6 » by **Da_Mane_Man** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 4:45 am

blueNorange wrote:
Da_Mane_Man wrote:yea, the kings are waaaayyy above us in terms of young talent

c - spencer hawes
pf - jason thompson
sg - kevin martin

the knicks don't have anyone ... gallinari is a question mark although he has great potential and chandler will most likely be a decent defensive player with a respectable mid range game.

you think jason thompson is better than chandler??? spencer hawes is no superstar either. he can't beat out a 35 year old brad miller for the starting spot. kevin martin is a very good player, but he doesn't exactly shut people down on the defensive end. stop overrating other teams' players.

BelieveTheDream · Post #7 » by **BelieveTheDream** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 4:48 am

1-thompson is a power foward, 2- that video was actually real funny spencer hawes was killing me

Da_Mane_Man · Post #8 » by **Da_Mane_Man** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 4:56 am

i know he's a pf but we don't necessarily have to compare them by position. if you want to, we have david lee who's also better than thompson

Post #9 » by **nyknicks2k2** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:00 am

blueNorange wrote:
Da_Mane_Man wrote:yea, the kings are waaaayyy above us in terms of young talent

c - spencer hawes
pf - jason thompson
sg - kevin martin

the knicks don't have anyone ... gallinari is a question mark although he has great potential and chandler will most likely be a decent defensive player with a respectable mid range game.

One of the greatest 3 man core in the history of the NBA.

I see it like this:

T-1: Everyone else in the NBA besides the Knicks
30: Knicks

Knicks sux.

method · Post #10 » by **method** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:07 am

blueNorange wrote:
Da_Mane_Man wrote:yea, the kings are waaaayyy above us in terms of young talent

c - spencer hawes
pf - jason thompson
sg - kevin martin

the knicks don't have anyone ... gallinari is a question mark although he has great potential and chandler will most likely be a decent defensive player with a respectable mid range game.

Nate-16 ppg
Lee- 15 ppg
Will- 15 ppg.

And Gallo

I wouldnt say we have nobody, and Duhon is only 25 and Curry is 26.

blueNorange · Post #11 » by **blueNorange** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:07 am

Da_Mane_Man wrote:you think jason thompson is better than chandler???

umm .. yeah.

Da_Mane_Man wrote:spencer hawes is no superstar either.

never said he was one.

Da_Mane_Man wrote:he can't beat out a 35 year old brad miller for the starting spot.

and your point is ...

Da_Mane_Man wrote:kevin martin is a very good player, but he doesn't exactly shut people down on the defensive end. stop overrating other teams' players.

he's a respectable defender. i'm not overrating team's players ... i'm more jealous that they actually have a foundation to build around. the thunder have westbrook, durant, and green ... the knigs have hawes, martin, and thompson ... etc. knicks have nothing.

blueNorange · Post #12 » by **blueNorange** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:10 am

method wrote:
blueNorange wrote:
Da_Mane_Man wrote:yea, the kings are waaaayyy above us in terms of young talent

c - spencer hawes
pf - jason thompson
sg - kevin martin

the knicks don't have anyone ... gallinari is a question mark although he has great potential and chandler will most likely be a decent defensive player with a respectable mid range game.

Nate-16 ppg
Lee- 15 ppg
Will- 15 ppg.

And Gallo

I wouldnt say we have nobody, and Duhon is only 25 and Curry is 26.

nate and lee are bench players who are benefiting from a system that pads their numbers. chandler doesn't look like a player you build around ... of course he can improve his game but so far he's just a solid defensive player with a mid range game but is to stupid to realize it so he chucks 3's even though he's not a good shooter from downtown.

Post #13 » by **nyknicks2k2** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:13 am

blueNorange wrote:i'm not overrated team's players

LOL

That lying issue you have is a much bigger problem.

Jason Thompson looks like a decent player thus far yet he has good potential and is a player you build with yet Chandler isn't?

Your just as bad as Knicks homers.

blueNorange · Post #14 » by **blueNorange** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:16 am

nyknicks2k2 wrote:
blueNorange wrote:i'm not overrated team's players

LOL

That lying issue you have is a much bigger problem.

Jason Thompson looks like a decent player thus far yet he has good potential and is a player you build with yet Chandler isn't?

Your just as bad as Knicks homers.

silly 2k2 ... you point out a very rare spelling error :lol:

i never said chandler doesn't have any potential ... i'm just saying he needs to improve his game because if he doesn't he'll just be a guy who defends and can knock down the occasional jumper. if i were to choose between the 2, i pick thompson ... wouldn't you??

btw ... it's you're, not your

Post #15 » by **knicks742** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:20 am

blueNorange wrote:
nyknicks2k2 wrote:
blueNorange wrote:i'm not overrated team's players

LOL

That lying issue you have is a much bigger problem.

Jason Thompson looks like a decent player thus far yet he has good potential and is a player you build with yet Chandler isn't?

Your just as bad as Knicks homers.

silly 2k2 ... you point out a very rare spelling error i never said chandler doesn't have any potential ... i'm just saying he needs to improve his game because if he doesn't he'll just be a guy who defends and can knock down the occasional jumper. if i were to choose between the 2, i pick thompson ... wouldn't you??

btw ... it's you're, not your

Hawes, Lee, nate, thompson all role players so I don't get your point. The only superstar you mentioned in the entire thing was Durant. The rest are all role players.

blueNorange · Post #16 » by **blueNorange** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:21 am

hawes and thompson are starters ... lee and nate are bench players.

that's my point .. the so called 'core' people overrate are nothing but benchies.

Post #17 » by **nyknicks2k2** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:23 am

blueNorange wrote:
nyknicks2k2 wrote:
blueNorange wrote:i'm not overrated team's players

LOL

That lying issue you have is a much bigger problem.

Jason Thompson looks like a decent player thus far yet he has good potential and is a player you build with yet Chandler isn't?

Your just as bad as Knicks homers.

silly 2k2 ... you point out a very rare spelling error i never said chandler doesn't have any potential ... i'm just saying he needs to improve his game because if he doesn't he'll just be a guy who defends and can knock down the occasional jumper. if i were to choose between the 2, i pick thompson ... wouldn't you??

btw ... it's you're, not your

I didn't point it out as a spelling error. I pointed it out as you bring incorrect. Again.

As for what you said, to put it point blank, you said one guy you build with and one you don't. One needs to improve to be there and one is already there with alright at best numbers.

Between you and nykstill, I don't know who loves alright numbers from other teams the most.

Da_Mane_Man · Post #18 » by **Da_Mane_Man** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:24 am

nyknicks2k2 wrote:
blueNorange wrote:
Da_Mane_Man wrote:yea, the kings are waaaayyy above us in terms of young talent

c - spencer hawes
pf - jason thompson
sg - kevin martin

the knicks don't have anyone ... gallinari is a question mark although he has great potential and chandler will most likely be a decent defensive player with a respectable mid range game.

One of the greatest 3 man core in the history of the NBA.

I see it like this:

T-1: Everyone else in the NBA besides the Knicks
30: Knicks

Knicks sux.

well, kevin martin is 26 so if you wanna count him then we gotta count duhon and curry. i'd take our young guys over the kings'. oh, and if kevin martin is a respectable defender, then david lee is a force to be reckoned with

blueNorange · Post #19 » by **blueNorange** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:24 am

now, now ... lets not get personal here and throw out poster comparisons.

Post #20 » by **nyknicks2k2** » Thu Jan 8, 2009 5:26 am

Da_Mane_Man wrote:he can't beat out a 35 year old brad miller for the starting spot.

blueNorange wrote:and your point is ...

blueNorange wrote:hawes and thompson are starters ... lee and nate are bench players.

that's my point .. the so called 'core' people overrate are nothing but benchies.

Game.

Damn bNo. Either it doesn't matter that a player starts/comes off the bench or it does.

Stick to one please. It makes no sense to flip flop.