Post#24 » by Paeds » Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:38 pm
and you are confused, Ignorant or a hypocrit
You concede that crawford is one the worst shooters in the NBA yet say he will look like Allan Houston compared to Hughes Yet Hughes has a better Career fg%[/quote]
You are pretty ignorant if you judge a player's shooting ability by FG%. That doesn't evaluate the number of 3's a person shoots or the success of their 3 point shooting. Hollinger is a douche, but his one stat that is top notch is his TS%. If you look at those stats you will see why Crawford is a better shooter. Or you can continue to be an uninformed **** for no reason whatsoever. Your choice.
Larry Hughes is very good at getting to the basket. However he can't make lay-ups and is a cancer. We will see how he works. This is really his last chance to prove himself to the league. If he screws up here he will be relegated to Bonzie Wells status and blackballed from the league.[/quote]
Really? FG % is the amount of makes and misses, 3 pt shooting has its own %
Does it factor in that Crawford doesnt goto the hole too?
Crwford chucks more 3pters, Hughes shoots WAY more Ft's
Crawford is a 40% fg shooter, anyone who trys to say he is a good shooter or "can shoot" is Ignorant period
See`Ray allen for a SG that shoots 3's