aleZ wrote:BadMofoPimp wrote:By the way, you are a funny guy and that was a funny joke. Lol. Dwight is not a game changer, hahahaha. Good One. Dwight is not leaving, face the facts.
He's been a magic player since 04 and we've made the finals once. All management's fault? I don't think so. He needs to play beside other stars to reach his potential since offensively he can be contained. Ask the Celtics, Hawks or Lakers for some advice.
If you think having Dwight alone will change this team's fortunes you're gonna be disappointed. Again.
I think he's a defensive game changer. I think most GMs will say that he's in the top 3 or so of players to build around.
But that's it - Dwight needs to be built around as he's not a player that will single handedly make a team an automatic contender. In my opinion he's not a player that can lead/will his team to that next level. He's not a player that can take over a game -- partly due the fact he's a C and therefore doesn't handle the ball.
If you look at recent history though, most championship teams have had one or more superstars and then a couple of stars, or other players that can also take over a game.
The exception is the Pistons, and possibly Dallas last year (1 superstar and no other "star" - to me Kidd (at this point in his career) and Terry are debateable in that role)
2000 Los Angeles Lakers 4–2 Indiana Pacers
2001 Los Angeles Lakers 4–1 Philadelphia 76ers
2002 Los Angeles Lakers 4–0 New Jersey Nets
2003 San Antonio Spurs 4–2 New Jersey Nets
2004 Los Angeles Lakers 1–4 Detroit Pistons
2005 San Antonio Spurs 4–3 Detroit Pistons
2006 Dallas Mavericks 2–4 Miami Heat
2007 San Antonio Spurs 4–0 Cleveland Cavaliers
2008 Los Angeles Lakers 2–4 Boston Celtics
2009 Los Angeles Lakers 4–1 Orlando Magic
2010 Los Angeles Lakers 4–3 Boston Celtics
2011 Dallas Mavericks 4–2 Miami Heat
You need a superstar player (Dwight) but you also need a well built team around him - hopefully our new GM will do this.