ImageImageImageImage

Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) P3

Moderators: Knightro, Howard Mass, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, ChosenSavior, SOUL, UCF

User avatar
SOUL
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 55,128
And1: 37,395
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Neo Banchero
     

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#761 » by SOUL » Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:25 pm

yeah i can try, on sunday once the deadline is. if not we can do it. dont see a huge deal bout dat!
Image
WillyJakkz
RealGM
Posts: 10,804
And1: 3,419
Joined: Jun 10, 2009
Location: Orlando FL

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#762 » by WillyJakkz » Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:09 am

I agree w/ you Lin, I'm down w/ TRYING to get some judges from other boards etc vs us doing it ourselves which seems like that's SOULs intent.

Soul you did a good job getting this thing started but really dropped the rock finishing this thing out homie. I understand being busy etc and if done again maybe it's best to try to delegate some authority to other dudes like Lin, kneega etc who have been all in on this draft as it seems even you have lost interest in this.

It's seeming like it's ending w a fizzle and that's a shame cause this started out really really interesting.

Anyway shoutout to all the GM's who pimped their teams, took alotta work. Kudos.
User avatar
SOUL
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 55,128
And1: 37,395
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Neo Banchero
     

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#763 » by SOUL » Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:21 am

when have I not delegated? every thing i've done or wanted to do has usually been shot down because majority didnt want that, and its fine. people wanted to sim for a few days and then i posted the pimp thread. then everybody disappears.. i dont get what you want me to do about that.

all im saying (and ive been saying since the beginning) is that you'll probably get a more fair shake of things with people that were IN the draft rather than outsiders that havent really been paying attention/dont want to read everything.

if we COULD get those, thats fine. im not against trying to get judges from knicks board or whatever - I never said that, all im saying is i've read knicks B-A-T's and theres a lot of drama at the end because theres just 1 or 2 people judging or chiming in, I'd rather get 10-15 from people actually in it since you wont choose your whole team.

again, i did get busy but I dont get what you want me to do. All I'm saying is my opinion and I don't think it's too "out there" as an idea, and I never made it the "final say"
Image
User avatar
SOUL
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 55,128
And1: 37,395
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Neo Banchero
     

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#764 » by SOUL » Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:22 am

fact is.. the whole dwight thing happened, and people went on vacay. we still got a lot of teams that pimped out, only thing now is judges. if you want to put it in the hands of 1 or 2 people, fine by me. but ive said since the START i'd rather have us judge, and I find nothing wrong with that. i dont think anybody is pathetic enough to try to win this by trying to bribe another person.
Image
OrlChamps2030
General Manager
Posts: 7,739
And1: 4,153
Joined: Jul 18, 2009
     

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#765 » by OrlChamps2030 » Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:24 pm

BAT is cool and all..but pimping your team out takes a lot of work. I may get around to it but if not I'll just let the judges take a look at my roster ya dig

i just pimped phew that took a while
User avatar
FFBlitzace
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 35,317
And1: 7,777
Joined: Jan 14, 2004
Location: Beyond the Space, Beyond the Time
 

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#766 » by FFBlitzace » Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:52 pm

I pimped a very small amount, but then lost my motivation once it became clear to me that I had no chance of winning if we were going to judge it ourselves. So I decided to be a baby about it, pack up my ball, and go home. Which is always the best option.
WillyJakkz
RealGM
Posts: 10,804
And1: 3,419
Joined: Jun 10, 2009
Location: Orlando FL

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#767 » by WillyJakkz » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:04 pm

FFBlitzace wrote:I pimped a very small amount, but then lost my motivation once it became clear to me that I had no chance of winning if we were going to judge it ourselves. So I decided to be a baby about it, pack up my ball, and go home. Which is always the best option.
User avatar
Lin Your Face
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,387
And1: 48
Joined: Feb 15, 2010

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#768 » by Lin Your Face » Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:46 am

I had some spare time today and I decided to rank the teams of the BAT. I'm basically finished, but I'm tired now and I want to make things a little more presentable and skim over the pimping thread tomorrow before I post them. I realize that my rankings aren't the official rankings. Get pumped.
Take a second to join a fantasy football freeroll to win $1000: http://www.draftstreet.com/l/fr_nfl2013.aspx?pid=118&r=gwater&subid=
Top 100 win cash.

The Supreme Court ruled fantasy sports gambling's legal.DraftStreet's in NY not the Caymans.
TDJacksonville
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,229
And1: 242
Joined: Jun 29, 2012
Location: Your girlfriends panties

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#769 » by TDJacksonville » Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:10 am

WillyJakkz wrote:
FFBlitzace wrote:I pimped a very small amount, but then lost my motivation once it became clear to me that I had no chance of winning if we were going to judge it ourselves. So I decided to be a baby about it, pack up my ball, and go home. Which is always the best option.
Trailblazers
PG:
SG:
F:
F:
C:
Wzajan89 @ gmail . com
User avatar
SOUL
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 55,128
And1: 37,395
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Neo Banchero
     

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#770 » by SOUL » Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:31 am

To be fair, I dont think you guys would have a chance of winning if we didnt judge it ourselves LOL. I like Blitz team though, and Rockets too. I just have to see what its compared to
Image
Bensational
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,050
And1: 12,366
Joined: Apr 10, 2001
     

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#771 » by Bensational » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:59 am

haha, i don't know if i'm prepared to read through everyone's "pimping" to judge them. so much text and too many pictures make it a chore to get through.

i'll give it a shot when i get some time.
p0peye
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,340
And1: 2,971
Joined: Feb 27, 2006
 

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#772 » by p0peye » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:25 am

I'm on a vacation in Greece this past few weeks, so I wasn't as active. Just pimped my team a bit, I know it's late but whatever. :P
User avatar
FFBlitzace
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 35,317
And1: 7,777
Joined: Jan 14, 2004
Location: Beyond the Space, Beyond the Time
 

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#773 » by FFBlitzace » Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:50 am

I don't really mean to take a side on the judging debate. I was just letting my butthurt flow a little bit.
11/18/2017 - I have officially disowned Nikola Vucevic and branded him a loser.

- Skal Labissiere was my guy in 2016 pre-trade. Whoops, but I still believe.
- Malik Monk was my guy in 2017. Whoops(?)
- Mo Bamba was my guy in 2018. TBD.
Bensational
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,050
And1: 12,366
Joined: Apr 10, 2001
     

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#774 » by Bensational » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:59 pm

FFBlitzace wrote:I don't really mean to take a side on the judging debate. I was just letting my butthurt flow a little bit.


those are an unfortunately visual choice of words.
User avatar
Lin Your Face
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,387
And1: 48
Joined: Feb 15, 2010

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#775 » by Lin Your Face » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:25 pm

So I posted my rankings. Hopefully, outsiders or BAT participants will also help judge.

Also, Willy I'd alter the acronym BAT to build a team in your post on the general board. I'm assuming people there just don't understand what BAT means and ignore the post.

EDIT: Also, I'd be interested in hearing people's opinions on my team too. If I included myself in my rankings I'd have put myself as the top team overall with the best chance to win the 1st championship.
User avatar
SOUL
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 55,128
And1: 37,395
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Neo Banchero
     

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#776 » by SOUL » Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:05 am

also willy, no offense, the thread you made had no explanation of how we're being judged. they are purely going to judge on the best team right now and thats it.. dont get how that makes more sense than our own people doing it.
Image
User avatar
SOUL
Forum Mod - Magic
Forum Mod - Magic
Posts: 55,128
And1: 37,395
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Neo Banchero
     

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#777 » by SOUL » Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:01 am

you can edit it in if you want, still dont think they'd pay much attention to it. we'll see!

ill rank mine tomorrow once i get home from work. thanks for putting that time to judge yours, lin.
Image
User avatar
br7knicks
Knicks Forum The Professor
Posts: 34,710
And1: 10,629
Joined: Dec 01, 2008
     

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#778 » by br7knicks » Tue Aug 21, 2012 9:15 pm

Lin Your Face wrote:I had some spare time today and I decided to rank the teams of the BAT. I'm basically finished, but I'm tired now and I want to make things a little more presentable and skim over the pimping thread tomorrow before I post them. I realize that my rankings aren't the official rankings. Get pumped.



i lol'd pretty hard at most of the teams ahead of me, but it's all conjecture.
RIP, magnumt '19

PG: M Smart/E Bledsoe/I Smith
SG: D Russell/C LeVert/L Stephenson
SF: H Barnes/T Horton Tucker/
PF: T Harris/C Boucher/B Griffin/
C: J Valanciunas/J McGee/
User avatar
Lin Your Face
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,387
And1: 48
Joined: Feb 15, 2010

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#779 » by Lin Your Face » Wed Aug 22, 2012 1:11 am

It's too bad that the Knicks board just started a new BAT. Its probably occupying the people who probably would've been a judge.
User avatar
Lin Your Face
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,387
And1: 48
Joined: Feb 15, 2010

Re: Official Build-a-Team 1.0: Trade/Discussion (2 Hr Picks) 

Post#780 » by Lin Your Face » Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:06 pm

Soul, you realize you were allowed to include the Spurs in your ranking?
Take a second to join a fantasy football freeroll to win $1000: http://www.draftstreet.com/l/fr_nfl2013.aspx?pid=118&r=gwater&subid=
Top 100 win cash.

The Supreme Court ruled fantasy sports gambling's legal.DraftStreet's in NY not the Caymans.

Return to Orlando Magic