yardbarker

OT: Non-UCF College Football

Moderators: damo[23], Howard Mass, MagicMadness, eyriq, Devin 1L, FFBlitzace

ImageImageImageImage

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby craig01 on Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:20 am

tiderulz wrote:so those other teams see how hard it is to be #1 and take teams best shots.


Kansas St has had a great year, but they proved that their status was a bit higher than their talent level.

Give 'em credit but I'd expect to see them fall to at least #6, maybe a couple of spots farther down too.

The Baylor win didn't surprise me, but the Oregon loss was shocking.

And yeah, it's tough to stay on top.

I think Notre Dame goes down next week too.....provided Barkley recovers
Basketball is driven by three principles:

1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
craig01
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 19076
And1: 10
Joined: Dec 24, 2005
Location: orlando

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby craig01 on Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:51 pm

Looks like Alabama can control their own destiny again....
Basketball is driven by three principles:

1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
craig01
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 19076
And1: 10
Joined: Dec 24, 2005
Location: orlando

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby tiderulz on Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:20 am

craig01 wrote:Looks like Alabama can control their own destiny again....


how is this for a crazy scenario that the nation would hate.

USC beats ND.

UGA beats Bama.

UGA plays UF again for the national title. 2 teams from the SEC, 1 team not even playing for their division and conference championship.

The nation and pundits would go nuts.
User avatar
tiderulz
General Manager
 
Posts: 8763
And1: 47
Joined: Jun 16, 2010

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby craig01 on Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:29 pm

tiderulz wrote:
craig01 wrote:Looks like Alabama can control their own destiny again....


how is this for a crazy scenario that the nation would hate.

USC beats ND.

UGA beats Bama.

UGA plays UF again for the national title. 2 teams from the SEC, 1 team not even playing for their division and conference championship.

The nation and pundits would go nuts.


LOL
Basketball is driven by three principles:

1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
craig01
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 19076
And1: 10
Joined: Dec 24, 2005
Location: orlando

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby Nemesis21 on Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:42 pm

tiderulz wrote:
craig01 wrote:Looks like Alabama can control their own destiny again....


how is this for a crazy scenario that the nation would hate.

USC beats ND.

UGA beats Bama.

UGA plays UF again for the national title. 2 teams from the SEC, 1 team not even playing for their division and conference championship.

The nation and pundits would go nuts.




Not going to happen, don't forget the loss to FSU coming up.
NBA = Rigged
User avatar
Nemesis21
RealGM
 
Posts: 23704
And1: 7
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: 407

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby magicman123 on Mon Nov 19, 2012 6:54 pm

Nemesis21 wrote:
tiderulz wrote:
craig01 wrote:Looks like Alabama can control their own destiny again....


how is this for a crazy scenario that the nation would hate.

USC beats ND.

UGA beats Bama.

UGA plays UF again for the national title. 2 teams from the SEC, 1 team not even playing for their division and conference championship.

The nation and pundits would go nuts.




Not going to happen, don't forget the loss to FSU coming up.


Unfortunately, i think thats true
Image
User avatar
magicman123
RealGM
 
Posts: 24647
And1: 67
Joined: Jan 13, 2007
Location: "THO"

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby Gerhalt11 on Mon Nov 19, 2012 7:10 pm

^Unfortunately, I know that's true.
Gerhalt11
Veteran
 
Posts: 2902
And1: 6
Joined: Dec 4, 2004

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby craig01 on Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:36 pm

Ah, it would be ironic though ....no matter how remote the possibility
Basketball is driven by three principles:

1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
craig01
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 19076
And1: 10
Joined: Dec 24, 2005
Location: orlando

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby craig01 on Tue Nov 20, 2012 7:43 am

With the move by Maryland and Rutger's expected announcement today, it looks like all of this conference crap is heading towards a steep cliff....with the left-outs being forced to jump off.

The move by Maryland is horrible for everyone except their bank account.
Basketball is driven by three principles:

1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
craig01
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 19076
And1: 10
Joined: Dec 24, 2005
Location: orlando

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby tiderulz on Tue Nov 20, 2012 7:45 am

craig01 wrote:With the move by Maryland and Rutger's expected announcement today, it looks like all of this conference crap is heading towards a steep cliff....with the left-outs being forced to jump off.

The move by Maryland is horrible for everyone except their bank account.


It helps the Big 10. Gets them more East Coast exposure, gets them into the DC tv markets. It is great for Rutgers, they were going nowhere in the Big East and would have been left sitting out in a different conference re-organization. No one was going to come calling for a NJ school

I think we are headed to four 16 team conferences. SEC - Big 10 (16?) - Pac 16(?) - ACC, possibly an expanded Big 12 to catch any of the bigger name schools left out of the 4 above,
User avatar
tiderulz
General Manager
 
Posts: 8763
And1: 47
Joined: Jun 16, 2010

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby craig01 on Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:08 am

I was referring to the UM folks.....but yeah, Rutgers is a clear winner.

The Big 10 gets exposure into huge markets, but those markets really don't hold that much water for college football.

Maryland football is an afterthought in that market geographically speaking unless they are winning (which hasn't happened consistently since Bobby Ross left)....for the fan base, this move is regrettable

Rutgers has had recent success too, but the NY market is about baseball and NFL in the fall. I don't see that much impact in ratings when Rutgers plays at Northwestern. Still, the move for Rutgers is obviously a no-brainer
Basketball is driven by three principles:

1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
craig01
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 19076
And1: 10
Joined: Dec 24, 2005
Location: orlando

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby craig01 on Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:09 am

I was referring to the UM folks.....but yeah, Rutgers is a clear winner.

The Big 10 gets exposure into huge markets, but those markets really don't hold that much water for college football.

Maryland football is an afterthought in that market geographically speaking unless they are winning (which hasn't happened consistently since Bobby Ross left)....for the fan base, this move is regrettable

Rutgers has had recent success too, but the NY market is about baseball and NFL in the fall. I don't see that much impact in ratings when Rutgers plays at Northwestern. Still, the move for Rutgers is obviously a no-brainer
Basketball is driven by three principles:

1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
craig01
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 19076
And1: 10
Joined: Dec 24, 2005
Location: orlando

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby craig01 on Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:09 am

I was referring to the UM folks.....but yeah, Rutgers is a clear winner.

The Big 10 gets exposure into huge markets, but those markets really don't hold that much water for college football.

Maryland football is an afterthought in that market geographically speaking unless they are winning (which hasn't happened consistently since Bobby Ross left)....for the fan base, this move is regrettable

Rutgers has had recent success too, but the NY market is about baseball and NFL in the fall. I don't see that much impact in ratings when Rutgers plays at Northwestern. Still, the move for Rutgers is obviously a no-brainer
Basketball is driven by three principles:

1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
craig01
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 19076
And1: 10
Joined: Dec 24, 2005
Location: orlando

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby N4U|Redux on Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:25 pm

16 team conferences are inevitable. It won't happen immediately. I know a lot of rumors are flying around about B10 adding UVa and BC next, for instance, but I don't see it. That's a lot of diluting really quickly.

I think the B10 stays pat at 14 for the moment, the ACC grabs UConn or Louisville to get back to 14, and we call it a day for awhile again. To me, B12 holds the cards. Are they uncomfortable at 10 for much longer?
"If I help get South Florida into the tournament, then 20 years from now when South Florida is ranked No. 1 in the country, people will look at the history and say, 'Dominique Jones started that program.'"
N4U|Redux
RealGM
 
Posts: 10683
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 5, 2004

Re: OT: Non-UCF College Football

Postby craig01 on Wed Nov 21, 2012 8:24 am

Nope, they won't stay there long.

Who and when they go after remains to be seen, but their future invitations could help or cripple USF/UCF's aspirations to hang with decent company in the future....
Basketball is driven by three principles:

1) Movement 2) Application of fundamentals 3) Predictability
craig01
Forum Mod
 
Posts: 19076
And1: 10
Joined: Dec 24, 2005
Location: orlando

PreviousNext

Return to Orlando Magic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BaunceyChillups, blue and white, dsg2021, Hilltop, londoncollin, MagicRays, Viper1500