ImageImageImageImage

ORL/LAC

Moderators: Knightro, Howard Mass, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, ChosenSavior, SOUL, UCF

MagicFan32
RealGM
Posts: 14,953
And1: 790
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
     

Re: ORL/LAC 

Post#16 » by MagicFan32 » Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:12 am

Clippers are NOT moving Bledsoe til CP3 is inked
aol4532 on bill russell
I think if you put McGee back then, he would get those blocks just as easily as Russell did. Russell's athleticism was well ahead of the players of his time, and that's about it.
User avatar
Dub_Sax
Rookie
Posts: 1,178
And1: 111
Joined: Jun 22, 2001
Location: Ocoee, FL

Re: ORL/LAC 

Post#17 » by Dub_Sax » Fri Nov 16, 2012 10:36 am

MagicFan32 wrote:Clippers are NOT moving Bledsoe til CP3 is inked


Fine! We can revisit this AFTER CP3 signs then.. I mean, other than the Knicks, I really dont see him going anywhere else anyway.
User avatar
KingRobb02
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,464
And1: 917
Joined: Aug 07, 2007
         

Re: ORL/LAC 

Post#18 » by KingRobb02 » Fri Nov 16, 2012 2:26 pm

Dub_Sax wrote:
MagicFan32 wrote:Clippers are NOT moving Bledsoe til CP3 is inked


Fine! We can revisit this AFTER CP3 signs then.. I mean, other than the Knicks, I really dont see him going anywhere else anyway.


Did you see Lebron picking Miami a year before it happened?
User avatar
BadMofoPimp
RealGM
Posts: 47,392
And1: 11,598
Joined: Oct 12, 2003
Location: In the Paint

Re: ORL/LAC 

Post#19 » by BadMofoPimp » Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:12 pm

Can't see Clips trading their starting defensive minded center for BBD. I doubt they would do Bledsoe for JJ unless there is much sweetener.

Also, I remember quite a few people on RealGM thinking LeBron going to Miami. The reason being Wade wasn't going to leave Miami and those two really wanted to play together.
Image

Provin Ya'll Wrong!!!
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 36,565
And1: 7,901
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: ORL/LAC 

Post#20 » by drsd » Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:14 pm

Bensational wrote:i could see a JJ for Bledsoe + fillers deal going down.


This makes sense only if GM Hennigan imagines that Bledsoe is a long-term starter at PG. Most project this kid as a combo guard, and said players are usually bench guys.

Still there are not really options for Orlando going forward at the PG slot, and this might be the type of gamble GM Hennigan needs to make.

..
User avatar
G-Heel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,252
And1: 365
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Injured
       

Re: ORL/LAC 

Post#21 » by G-Heel » Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:04 pm

I'd give BBD for a bag of cheetos
Fire Otis!
SmiteaDwight
Banned User
Posts: 2,425
And1: 14
Joined: May 31, 2010

Re: ORL/LAC 

Post#22 » by SmiteaDwight » Sat Nov 17, 2012 12:17 am

drsd wrote:
Bensational wrote:i could see a JJ for Bledsoe + fillers deal going down.


This makes sense only if GM Hennigan imagines that Bledsoe is a long-term starter at PG. Most project this kid as a combo guard, and said players are usually bench guys.

Still there are not really options for Orlando going forward at the PG slot, and this might be the type of gamble GM Hennigan needs to make.

..


They're calling Bledsoe "mini Lebron" now because of his incredible athleticism and physicality. While I would agree the Clippers have a surplus of rotation caliber guards who are ball dominant, they can net much better than JJ for Bledsoe if they were to trade him.
User avatar
Reverse_Angle
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,849
And1: 262
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
Location: Keep those balls in the air!

Re: ORL/LAC 

Post#23 » by Reverse_Angle » Sat Nov 17, 2012 1:40 am

SmiteaDwight wrote:
drsd wrote:
Bensational wrote:i could see a JJ for Bledsoe + fillers deal going down.


This makes sense only if GM Hennigan imagines that Bledsoe is a long-term starter at PG. Most project this kid as a combo guard, and said players are usually bench guys.

Still there are not really options for Orlando going forward at the PG slot, and this might be the type of gamble GM Hennigan needs to make.

..


They're calling Bledsoe "mini Lebron" now because of his incredible athleticism and physicality. While I would agree the Clippers have a surplus of rotation caliber guards who are ball dominant, they can net much better than JJ for Bledsoe if they were to trade him.


not necessarily. there are not many teams that needs a guard like him, especially the current contenders.
Image

"Aaron Gordon will cost Henny's job by Dec 2016." Predicted Dec 2014.

"O'Quinn will have a longer and more successful NBA career than Nicholson." Predicted Jun 2012. Verified on Dec 2014.
User avatar
MagicalMe
Senior
Posts: 592
And1: 43
Joined: Jun 29, 2011

Re: ORL/LAC 

Post#24 » by MagicalMe » Sun Nov 18, 2012 11:40 am

JJ for Bledsoe with Jameer going to the 3rd party to get something for LAC?
We give our PG position to Bledsoe/Moore, but not sure i'd want to trade JJ the way he's playing this year..
Catledge
Starter
Posts: 2,361
And1: 833
Joined: Mar 04, 2003
     

Re: ORL/LAC 

Post#25 » by Catledge » Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:20 am

MagicalMe wrote:JJ for Bledsoe with Jameer going to the 3rd party to get something for LAC?
We give our PG position to Bledsoe/Moore, but not sure i'd want to trade JJ the way he's playing this year..


I don't know what reason there is to think that the Clips are looking to unload Bledsoe, but I would do that deal in a heartbeat.

Return to Orlando Magic