mhectorgato wrote:thelead wrote:
This is the mind boggling part to me.
A bad 22 win team with your choice of Wiggins, Embiid or Parker for the next SEVEN (guaranteed) years
OR
A bad 27 win team with your choice of Vonleh, Gordon, or Saric
The choice seems SO obvious. Then again, I wonder if antitankers even actively watch college basketball enough to observe the distinct levels/tiers of talent.
You're certainly not the only one to express this narrow acceptance of other's opinions. A stance like this is passive aggressive and implies that if one doesn't see it your way, they are:
1) wrong
2) idiot
3) stupid
4) narrow-sighted
5) don't want long term success
6) aren't hard-core fans
etc..
What I can't grasp -- not sure if it's generational or an upbringing or nature/nurture
-- to me is that many tankers can't even begin to accept there are alternative paths/reasons/ways/etc to their train of thought.
I can't speak to most anti-tankers - but I can see the thought process and logic behind the tanking process. I don't deny that there's at least a chance it's happening in ORL, well not with Davor (sic) himself
It just doesn't resonate with me the same way it does with you and others.
This, I think, has been the cause of the great board-wide bickering that makes this environment different than years past. It's as if this mentality is permeating the board: "if you don't see it our way, then you're an idiot because it's obvious we are tanking and any of the top 5 players is an absolute lock to be a franchise player".
This is why things haven't changed since I took a self-imposed hiatus - this "If you are not with us you are against us" mentality still runs the board --- forget the fact that we are all on the same side, rooting for the Magic. Look at the melt down in the Bklyn thread, the vent thread and now this one.
At least try to open your mind to the fact that your way is not the only way, or may not be the right way. You don't have you change your mind, just at least try to open your mind. No need to be so dismissive to other ways of thinking.
This is, what I thought at least, to be a
discussion board, not a soap box or a pulpit to preach a narrow-focused dogmatic message.