flying_mollusk wrote:Here is an interesting question. Let's say we don't enter into an extension agreement with Harris, and he is a RFA next summer. San Antonio seems to be having similar issues on reaching an extension with Kawhi Leonard, as he wants a max offer. (http://sports.yahoo.com/news/sources--n ... 09203.html).
Let's say they also don't reach a deal with him, and he also becomes a RFA. Entering the 2015 offseason, should we offer Leonard a max offer right off the bat? The timing of this could allow us to try and get Leonard, but if we miss, still keep Harris. Simply put, we'd have to make the offer to Leonard far enough such that he accepts it and San Antonio doesn't match it before another team does the same with Harris. I think this is very doable. If he declines or SA matches, we simply match on Harris for whatever he gets. The potential cons of this are that we piss Harris off if we lose both. As for whether Leonard is worth it.
"Leonard, 23, is considered one of the NBA's rising young stars, and multiple league executives told Yahoo Sports he'll command a max offer sheet on the market next summer."
Our lineup would be a defensive stud unit at the 1-4 positions:
C-Vuc
PF-Gordon
SF-Leonard
SG-Oladipo
PG-Payton
Leonard is considered one of the nba's rising stars because of how well he fits into the Spurs' system. IMO he is not a better offensive player than Harris, but a FAR superior defensive player. The lineup you described could potentially be great on defense, but on the flip side it could be PAINFUL to watch on offense. Even if they weren't as terrible on Offense as I imagine; it would be some boring/ugly basketball