MagicFan101 wrote:basketballRob wrote:Truth24 wrote:
We have drafted defensive minded players who had to work on offense for so many years now. So yeah I would rather draft a offensive player who needs some work on defense. Where we are drafting there really isn't any player who ticks it both ways, possible Isaac but I think he is going to take some time to develop. DSJ, Monk, and Markkanen are all more offensive oriented players who lack defense.
Have a feeling if we don't take Monk he'll be scoring over 20 ppg for the Knicks next season.
And?
Isiah Thomas averaged nearly 30 this season but it wasn't until he got hurt that the Celtics looked competitive against the Cavs.
At best Monk is the Robin to a Batman we don't have. Why not target guys with a chance to be more? DSJ, Tatum, Isaac. Each of these guys could be more. If not, we suck again and try our luck next year with a fresh management.
Tatum, Isaac, and DSJ all seem intriguing, but they all could be projects.
Monk doesn't have the size or wingspan, that most draft experts look at. I didn't like Booker coming out because of his short wingspan. Monk does have the same exact wingspan of Curry and the same kind of point production per minute that Curry and Durant had as freshman.
Monk does have a great ability to score against good competition. He did some amazing stuff at his age winning SEC POY. He might be that guy that just drops 25-30 every game from the start of his career, and opens the court for the rest of our players.
I do think the Magic probably take Isaac's though, because who knows maybe he could be a Giannis type player in the future. It's a tough call between players that could become stars, or a player that might already be a elite scorer.