ImageImageImage

The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 61)

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Foshan, sixers hoops, Sixerscan

Sixerlover
Starter
Posts: 2,113
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
Contact:

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#436 » by Sixerlover » Tue Jul 13, 2010 6:35 pm

Beasley's name will be thrown around for sure, Brewer?, Ellington (their going to try to use the hometown card)..

Either way that's a deal that minus Love, I don't see getting done. Didn't we already go through this with Minny a month ago at this time?

Any way, I'm with ChuckS and Kobblehead in that I'd rather see the young guys we have now develop and hopefully make the playoffs, instead of gutting the team of the only 2 vets we have (Iguodala and Brand) and try to build with a completely young squad and hope from that. I really don't like when people call it the "OKC" method either because the only reason they are a good team is because Kevin Durant is a freak of nature and a top 5 player in the league at 21. How many of those will be in the draft?

I'd rather call it the Chicago Bulls method. Especially if your managment is as poor as ours it outside of DiLeo. Chicago has been accumulating lottery picks since what '01? And they have no 2nd round appearances to show for it? I don't want that to end up being Philly..
User avatar
radrmd216
Rookie
Posts: 1,067
And1: 8
Joined: Jun 29, 2006

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#437 » by radrmd216 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:02 pm

I skimmed through the last couple pages, but I think I got what was said.

TK, I agree with you.

ChuckS, I'm saying if the Sixers trade Iggy they can get a good young player. Obviously I hope the player in the trade comes close to or exceeds the value of Iggy, but it won't be certain, and that is why the team might make the trade in the first place.

I don't know where you get that I think the current roster can become a championship contending team. if i thought that i wouldn;t think they need a top lottery talent. Also I only said a top lottery pick in '11 not for 2-5 years in a row.

I think without Iggy the Sixers will probably get a fairly high lottery pick. They would play the young guys and it would be good to see them develop but frustrating to see them make mistakes. For this one upcoming season though we would see bad play. The Sixers definitely cannot get a top lottery pick in '12, so that leaves '11 as the top lottery pick year and '12 and beyond the years for development. I think in '12 jrue and Turner can make this team exciting to watch.

Basically comes down to two things:
Jrue, Turner, player in Iggy deal, '11 lottery pick, whoever stays out of Lou, Thad, Speights, and Hawes, and cap space
vs.
Iggy, no cap space and a mid round pick.

I think the package of younger talent and cap space is better becuase you could keep the players or package them in a trade. Also in a few years young talent on rookie deals plus brand's expiring could make the Sixers future very bright. Again i don't see where the years of horrible basketball are. I would take a bad year for chance of great years or at worst a decent team over several years of mediocrity.
Sixerlover
Starter
Posts: 2,113
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 29, 2006
Contact:

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#438 » by Sixerlover » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:17 pm

radrmd216 wrote:Basically comes down to two things:
Jrue, Turner, player in Iggy deal, '11 lottery pick, whoever stays out of Lou, Thad, Speights, and Hawes, and cap space
vs.
Jrue, Turner, Iggy, '11 mid round pick, whoever stays out of Lou, Thad, Speights, and Hawes, no cap space


I think the package of younger talent and cap space is better becuase you could keep the players or package them in a trade. Also in a few years young talent on rookie deals plus brand's expiring could make the Sixers future very bright. Again i don't see where the years of horrible basketball are. I would take a bad year for chance of great years or at worst a decent team over several years of mediocrity.

fixed :D

Shows the reality of both the situations. One situation includes a 17,6 and 6 player who is young, with a large contract while the other situation shows another younger player to add to the current youth movement we already have
tk76
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,615
And1: 734
Joined: Jul 21, 2006

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#439 » by tk76 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:39 pm

radrmd216 wrote:
ChuckS, I'm saying if the Sixers trade Iggy they can get a good young player. Obviously I hope the player in the trade comes close to or exceeds the value of Iggy, but it won't be certain, and that is why the team might make the trade in the first place.

I don't know where you get that I think the current roster can become a championship contending team. if i thought that i wouldn;t think they need a top lottery talent. Also I only said a top lottery pick in '11 not for 2-5 years in a row.


Yeah, like I said before, their young players should all be close to entering their prime- so I do not see a 5 years prolonged rebuilding- whether they keep Iguodala or not. It really comes down to targeting 2-3 years from now as when this current team enters its peak. And whether you think Iguodala at 28-30 should be part of that.

Talent/age suggests that you should keep Iguodala. Especially if the return is pennies on the dollar. But it becomes a tougher issue looking at the teams finances and if you are offered a top prospect who meshes well with the rest of the roster... So I'm not saying we should be looking to "dump" Iguodala. But I am apposed to trading guys like Thad or Speights for short term Nocioni-like vets to try and win a few more games short term.

We
stuck with these young guys for a long time now- and hopefully the p[ay off will be soon. Absolutely no compelling reason to go "Bobcats" and star bringing in 30 year olds with bad contracts in the hope of a shallow playoff run.
sixerfan1976
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,779
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 07, 2005

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#440 » by sixerfan1976 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:40 pm

houston is also interested in iguodala.

willing to give Ariza and filler.

Still sounds like we are trying to move thad or kapono instead.
SmittyTheGreat
Sophomore
Posts: 163
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 25, 2008

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#441 » by SmittyTheGreat » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:44 pm

Hopefully filler doesn't mean Jordan Hill.


Budinger, on the other hand..
sixerfan1976
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,779
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 07, 2005

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#442 » by sixerfan1976 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:45 pm

dont think so on hill...but who knows...we got enough PF....

not sure there is room for budinger..we are heavy on SG/SF.
User avatar
bdownbear
Senior
Posts: 690
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 05, 2009

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#443 » by bdownbear » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:46 pm

Yao Ming?
SmittyTheGreat
Sophomore
Posts: 163
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 25, 2008

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#444 » by SmittyTheGreat » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:47 pm

Well I was thinking we'd add an another player on our side(like Green..if at all possible lol)
sixerfan1976
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,779
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 07, 2005

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#445 » by sixerfan1976 » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:49 pm

seems to be alot more trade/free agent movement this year...some real changes this offseason across the league.

Seems like we are taking the will listen on anyone mentality then why then come after iguodala we say no. I like Ariza actually but the filler they could offer doesnt excite me.
ExplosionsInDaSky
RealGM
Posts: 20,282
And1: 4,632
Joined: Mar 17, 2004

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#446 » by ExplosionsInDaSky » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:51 pm

Thats another deal i'd do in a heartbeat. Ariza is becoming a lights out shooter from deep and he doesn't need the ball to do so. As for the filler i'd be happy with Chuck Hayes or some other low post defender.
PhilasFinest
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 3,581
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
     

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#447 » by PhilasFinest » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:52 pm

ariza n iguodala are very very similar players
SparksFly87 wrote:Towns got boat feet and gets off the ground very slow with a lack of explosiveness . He is a rich mans Henry Sims to me. No thanks .
User avatar
sixerswillrule
RealGM
Posts: 16,668
And1: 3,598
Joined: Jul 24, 2003
Location: Disappointment

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#448 » by sixerswillrule » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:52 pm

We need to be getting at least one 1st round pick with Ariza.
ExplosionsInDaSky
RealGM
Posts: 20,282
And1: 4,632
Joined: Mar 17, 2004

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#449 » by ExplosionsInDaSky » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:53 pm

PhilasFinest wrote:ariza n iguodala are very very similar players


True but I think Iguodala is the more explosive player while Ariza is the better outside shooter.
User avatar
BringBackKorver
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,572
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 04, 2009

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#450 » by BringBackKorver » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:53 pm

sixerfan1976 wrote:houston is also interested in iguodala.

willing to give Ariza and filler.

Still sounds like we are trying to move thad or kapono instead.


I think Ariza, Hill, salary filler, and a couple picks would be okay. Ariza has a pretty good contract, Hill could be sent elsewhere for a center, and we could grab the NY package of picks or something to grab some more young assets.

I'd like to see Kapono moved for a big though ideally. That way it gives us a few more minutes and another year to see what Thad can do and make a decision on him.
ExplosionsInDaSky
RealGM
Posts: 20,282
And1: 4,632
Joined: Mar 17, 2004

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#451 » by ExplosionsInDaSky » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:54 pm

sixerswillrule wrote:We need to be getting at least one 1st round pick with Ariza.


That would be too much to ask for from Houston.
User avatar
sixerswillrule
RealGM
Posts: 16,668
And1: 3,598
Joined: Jul 24, 2003
Location: Disappointment

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#452 » by sixerswillrule » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:57 pm

ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:
sixerswillrule wrote:We need to be getting at least one 1st round pick with Ariza.


That would be too much to ask for from Houston.


No deal, then. If they want to get the far better player, they will need to add more value.
ExplosionsInDaSky
RealGM
Posts: 20,282
And1: 4,632
Joined: Mar 17, 2004

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#453 » by ExplosionsInDaSky » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:59 pm

sixerswillrule wrote:
ExplosionsInDaSky wrote:
sixerswillrule wrote:We need to be getting at least one 1st round pick with Ariza.


That would be too much to ask for from Houston.


No deal, then. If they want to get the far better player, they will need to add more value.


Look. Iguodala is not the far better player. It's a fairly even trade if you ask me. If Houston was to offer up Chuck Hayes (a good low post defender/rebounder) we would be getting fair value.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,708
And1: 16,082
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#454 » by Sixerscan » Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:05 pm

Ariza is no where near the player Iguodala is.

I would do Ariza and Hayes for Iguodala.
bumpo
Sophomore
Posts: 149
And1: 25
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
       

Re: The Sixerfan1976 Off-Season Thread (Update: Page 24) 

Post#455 » by bumpo » Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:08 pm

what about something based around kevin martin, and like jordan hill or something like that?

Return to Philadelphia 76ers