Fantasy Trade Thread

Post #2081 » by **Foshan** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 2:23 am

I think that's a pretty hefty over pay. I haven't been supper impressed with Schroeder, dude can't shoot if i remember correctly.

Draftandstash · Post #2082 » by **Draftandstash** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 5:08 am

Ya shooting seems to be something he could work on but he's still young enough to work on it and I see him being productive enough to be a piece in the future. I mean he's at minimum a future rotation player. I could be very wrong in two years but it appears if we got him at a reasonable cost would it really be the end of the world. What's good after Jamal Murray guard wise anyway? Again I could very well be mistaken come draft time but I feel it would be a positive deal to make.

iMoreland · Post #2083 » by **iMoreland** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 5:13 am

Draftandstash wrote:Ya shooting seems to be something he could work on but he's still young enough to work on it and I see him being productive enough to be a piece in the future. I mean he's at minimum a future rotation player. I could be very wrong in two years but it appears if we got him at a reasonable cost would it really be the end of the world. What's good after Jamal Murray guard wise anyway? Again I could very well be mistaken come draft time but I feel it would be a positive deal to make.

Demetrius Jackson

Draftandstash · Post #2084 » by **Draftandstash** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 5:23 am

Demetrius Jackson aye..nice gonna watch notre dame more now. I'm Canadian so Jamal Murray is definitely my first choice but having a plan b is not too bad.

Sportfan73 · Post #2085 » by **Sportfan73** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:56 am

So knowing our team so far how many of the assets we have collected would you be willing to give up for Anthony Davis as long as we could dump Landry for cap space. Is he worth Noel Okafor and a top pick?

BoomBap · Post #2086 » by **BoomBap** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 11:27 am

yes he is, but the pels would never do this trade.

XtremeDunkz · Post #2087 » by **XtremeDunkz** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 11:28 am

Sportfan73 wrote:So knowing our team so far how many of the assets we have collected would you be willing to give up for Anthony Davis as long as we could dump Landry for cap space. Is he worth Noel Okafor and a top pick?

So you would want to put Anthony Davis on a team worse than NOP and see what happens? lol......

Draftandstash · Post #2088 » by **Draftandstash** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 11:39 am

I would definitely trade for Anthony davis and the pelicans will definitely not trade ad. Hes arguably the best young player and has a shot at becoming the top dog in the nba. Somethings wrong with us if we didnt tank to get that type of player in a sixers uniform. Dont get me wrong okafor noel and a top pick is a very reasonable offer but im sure the pelicans could do better?

Sportfan73 · Post #2089 » by **Sportfan73** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:46 pm

Draftandstash wrote:I would definitely trade for Anthony davis and the pelicans will definitely not trade ad. Hes arguably the best young player and has a shot at becoming the top dog in the nba. Somethings wrong with us if we didnt tank to get that type of player in a sixers uniform. Dont get me wrong okafor noel and a top pick is a very reasonable offer but im sure the pelicans could do better?

So Okafor Noel our pick Lakers pick and Saric. Is that insane? I mean that would give us all the cap space in the world to chase say KD and Conley

MatthewGeigerII · Post #2090 » by **MatthewGeigerII** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 7:05 pm

Haven't posted in a while/ forgot my original username name and all - but having a debate with my buddies on possible trade candidates for a mini "harden" esque deal. I mean, really gambling on a "harden" deal in itself is almost as unpredictable as the draft, because you can't truly know when somebody will explode, but for fun at least we can think about it!

The criteria (IMO) would be
1) young (25 and under ish)
2)trapped behind players (this may a player who is not starting or a player who is a starter but has multiple all stars as scoring options before him)
and 3) statistics are getting better ever year to make you believe there is at least a chance at a breakout

Now doing a veryyy quick sift through the current nba rosters, i.e. not looking at stats too much, there isn't much right now.
Some of the players i can see maybe fitting as a candidate for this would be:

Harrison Barnes, Archie Goodwin, Alex Len, Motiejunas?, & Shabazz Muhammad - (we obv. need wing talent more)

then you have some players with young prospects sharing time at the same position, you may be able to snag one: Exum/Burke, hood/burks, hezonja/gordon ...

& lastly you have the young players who haven't been able to get a shot yet like cam payne and kyle anderson, that may not see time for a while.

for reference, this is hardens first 3 year trend in OKC:
Year Team G Min M A % M A % M A % Off Def Tot Ast TO Stl Blk PF Pts
2009 OKC 76 22.9 3.1 7.6 .403 1.2 3.3 .375 2.6 3.2 .808 0.6 2.6 3.2 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.3 2.6 9.9
2010 OKC 82 26.6 3.6 8.3 .436 1.4 4.0 .349 3.5 4.2 .843 0.5 2.6 3.1 2.1 1.3 1.1 0.3 2.5 12.2
2011 OKC 62 31.4 5.0 10.1 .491 1.8 4.7 .390 5.0 6.0 .846 0.5 3.6 4.1 3.7 2.2 1.0 0.2 2.4 16.8

mostof these guys aren't getting in 17ppg but hence the "mini" in my first paragraph

also a 4th "ghost" option could be somebody on the last year of their deal... bradley beal!

what do you guys think? who would you say could be a candidate for a move or is there just really no one out there worth it yet?

thanks!

Sportfan73 · Post #2091 » by **Sportfan73** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 8:00 pm

If we chose to have a defensive identity. Trade Okafor mia pick and okc pick for Smart, Brooklyn pick, and Bradley. You have Noel as your anchor as well as smart and Bradley as your 5th starter, 6th man combo guards to play with a scoring guard. Top that off with 3 lottery picks and build a defensive contender.

eagereyez · Post #2092 » by **eagereyez** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:35 pm

I wonder if MIL would be willing to deal Parker for Noel? They'd finally have a defensive anchor at the 5 and could move Monroe back to PF. Jabari is undersized for the 4. PHI loses its best defender, but it's not like he fits with Okafor anyway.

Sportfan73 · Post #2093 » by **Sportfan73** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:59 pm

eagereyez wrote:I wonder if MIL would be willing to deal Parker for Noel? They'd finally have a defensive anchor at the 5 and could move Monroe back to PF. Jabari is undersized for the 4. PHI loses its best defender, but it's not like he fits with Okafor anyway.

I'd rather trade Okafor for Giannis

Mik317 · Post #2094 » by **Mik317** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 10:08 pm

eagereyez wrote:I wonder if MIL would be willing to deal Parker for Noel? They'd finally have a defensive anchor at the 5 and could move Monroe back to PF. Jabari is undersized for the 4. PHI loses its best defender, but it's not like he fits with Okafor anyway.

I'd do that all day.

The Bucks wouldn't. They would murder their spacing even more and Jabari WANTED TO PLAY THERE..and is good. You don't **** that up.

Sportfan73 · Post #2095 » by **Sportfan73** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 10:16 pm

How about this at the time of the draft if the Brooklyn pick is say 2 and LA is 5, Okafor and LA pick for Smart Brooklyn pick and Bradley. We could pick 1 and 2. For some reason I feel like Hinkie took Okafor just because he knows there are teams out there like Boston desperate to consolidate assets into a star player.

jbent87 · Post #2096 » by **jbent87** » Fri Nov 20, 2015 10:24 pm

Sportfan73 wrote:How about this at the time of the draft if the Brooklyn pick is say 2 and LA is 5, Okafor and LA pick for Smart Brooklyn pick and Bradley. We could pick 1 and 2. For some reason I feel like Hinkie took Okafor just because he knows there are teams out there like Boston desperate to consolidate assets into a star player.

yep, that's another part of why you take the BPA. Because while they may not "fit" with your team at that time, that doesn't mean some other team won't overpay to make him fit perfectly on their squad.

LeonJordanJr24 · Post #2097 » by **LeonJordanJr24** » Sat Nov 21, 2015 6:10 pm

Noel ,Wrote, covington okc and maimi pick for Russell , swaggy p and lakers pick unprotected.

Building around okafor and or embiid requires a slower pace and more skilled half court players. Russell is a perfect fit for us at point guard. Lakers pick gets us 2 high end wing prospects secured along with 76ers pick.

Lakers sticks to their fast pace and gets randle a frontcourt mate in Noel to build with along with Wroten who fits with clarkson at combo guard. Covington gives them a solid smallforward.

dream team
Okafor/Holmes/Woods
Embiid/ Saric
Ingram/ Grant
Murray/ Stauskus
Russell/Marshall/Mcconell

Ericb5 · Post #2098 » by **Ericb5** » Sat Nov 21, 2015 7:49 pm

Sportfan73 wrote:
Draftandstash wrote:I would definitely trade for Anthony davis and the pelicans will definitely not trade ad. Hes arguably the best young player and has a shot at becoming the top dog in the nba. Somethings wrong with us if we didnt tank to get that type of player in a sixers uniform. Dont get me wrong okafor noel and a top pick is a very reasonable offer but im sure the pelicans could do better?

So Okafor Noel our pick Lakers pick and Saric. Is that insane? I mean that would give us all the cap space in the world to chase say KD and Conley

Give me a break. The Pelicans have the best asset in the league and they aren't trading him for anything.

Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums

scoobs07 · Post #2099 » by **scoobs07** » Sun Nov 22, 2015 12:05 am

Wondering if you would be interested in Julius Randle? His style of play is similar to a Charles Barkley. I'm happy with him, but I like our back up pf Larry Nance better because he plays better with Russell. If feel like Randle being a point forward is getting in the way of Russell's development.

OleSchool · Post #2100 » by **OleSchool** » Sun Nov 22, 2015 12:30 am

scoobs07 wrote:Wondering if you would be interested in Julius Randle? His style of play is similar to a Charles Barkley. I'm happy with him, but I like our back up pf Larry Nance better because he plays better with Russell. If feel like Randle being a point forward is getting in the way of Russell's development.

Personally, I didn't like Randle in 2014 and nothing I've seen made me change my mind. Besides the same problems the Lakers would've had defensively with OK4 and Randle would be the same problems we would have. Pass