Mr Sixer, I don't believe I was having an argument, it was a discussion, just because I/we don't agree with someone does not make it an argument. You start to derail a discussion by entering it and in the first sentence you say I am not trying to be offensive but you are spewing BS. Like I said no offense taken by me but someone else might think you are doing the "I am not being offensive thing " wrong!
You maybe right about the conversation being OT, but that happens a lot here. Nothing personal was said about the person I was dealing with, no one was called an idiot or a moron or anything personal just pointing out different ways of seeing a situation and history. Now if I had said "oh man you are an idiot and your are just talking out of your ass..or all of this is BS." Then it becomes somewhat of a personal attack. But that is just how I see things.
Now on to your reply.
I don't see how you could possibly accuse me of derailing the thread when I hopped into an argument about the role of the media in our tank when this thread is about a Eskin tweet regarding Courtney Witte. It is already OT and if you are so worried about abidings strictly by the rules you should've started another thread related to what we are discussing.
Where did I say you "are/have" derailed the thread? I basically said your opening sentence is one that could easily derail a conversation, there is a big difference. Sometimes, and I am no mod, but you have to let conversations run their course, even if they go OT somewhat. The mods do a great job of putting topics back on course or shutting them down when they get out of hand, and if I recall correctly I was in discussion with a mod, so I guess the topic was within bounds. I am not worried about the rules...like I said the Mods do a good job of enforcing them. What concerns me a little is topics devolving into the personal. Because then we all lose out on good conversations.
As for as the OT discussion goes, I believe the point I others are trying to make is that the only thing we care about is a championship caliber team. Hinkie does not leak information he does not want to because he believes that it increases our chances of creating a championship caliber team (having more information that the rest of the field is beneficial in trades and may also increase the value of your players) (also this isn't confirmed in any ways but it is a possibility that the fleecing of the payton-saric trade was only made possible due to Hinkie finding out that Hennigan was high on Payton somehow)
Once again I am not advocating giving away trade secrets. And I don't need everyone to be on board with my opinion. But a softer approach to the media, IMHO, would not be a bad idea. And doing what you can to present a fan friendly image to the public and having a good relationship with the media only helps your basketball product overall. But there are people who believe it does not so why bother. It's just an opinion.
I think it was genius that Hinkie got such an amazing haul on draft night. But once again just because you give information out to the media does not mean you have to give them your draft strategies and what you are planning to do. The two can exist together one does not exclude the other.
So what we are saying is that we do not want our chances of making a championship caliber team lessened at all, even to the smallest degree, by communicating with the media if it only serves to break our fall in case we fail
[/quote]
Who is this "we" you are talking about? The fans the realgm crew the Hinkie believers? You can have better media relations and do a lot to quell some of the negative feedback this team has got in the media. and not give away the farm. Donuts alone will not do the trick. Some may not see it that way, some may not see the value in it, and some don't deem it necessary. And that is OK. But some do. Like I said winning cures everything and if we start winning and putting out a good product everyone will be happy.
Thank you for your input!