ImageImageImage

Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, Foshan, sixers hoops

Skates
Head Coach
Posts: 7,244
And1: 3,776
Joined: Feb 18, 2008
       

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#21 » by Skates » Tue Jul 14, 2015 9:26 pm

Stauskas never looked like a SG/SF type, but he handles the ball pretty well to play as a distributor and ballhandler at the two next to a scoring PG, so he has some versatility that way. I'm not sure he will ever be better than a windmill who tries on defense and poaches the passing lanes a bit, but on offense I think he has a lot to offer with his shooting and ballhandling.
joyeuxnoel
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,407
And1: 699
Joined: Mar 31, 2015
   

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#22 » by joyeuxnoel » Tue Jul 14, 2015 9:31 pm

sixers hoops wrote:I was a big fan of Nik's going into the draft. I probably had him top 10 or so for the sixers.

Obviously, Nik's shooting is his biggest strength, and Nik needs some space to get his shot off successfully. Hartford had the stat showing just how poorly Nik shot when a defender was within 3 feet. And a lot of those contested shots were launched with Cousins drawing doubles. I hope in our scheme he gets clean shots and develops confidence.

Shooting aside, Nik is very crafty around the basket. Also, has a good enough handle.

Defensively, he reportedly gives effort but struggles due to lack of athleticism. My hope is that Staukas can benefit from having Noel behind him. Maybe he can guard close on the perimeter and if he gets beat, Noel could bail him out.

I am excited that he could be another important rotation piece for us.


his shooting percentage when contested is alarming and his defense is pretty awful. he'll never be klay (klay has elite d) but nik does have a couple strengths other than his shooting

he's pretty creative around the rim on his finishes and finishes at an above average rate, he has a good handle, hes not undersized, and hes very good off the ball
Embiid-Simmons-Covington

Fire Colangelo
sixers hoops
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 9,498
And1: 3,059
Joined: Jun 28, 2002

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#23 » by sixers hoops » Tue Jul 14, 2015 9:40 pm

Anyone expecting a star because he was drafted 8th will likely be disappointed. However, I think he has the potential to be a really nice part of the rotation.
ankle420breaker
General Manager
Posts: 8,921
And1: 1,965
Joined: Sep 21, 2005
Location: South Jersey

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#24 » by ankle420breaker » Tue Jul 14, 2015 10:01 pm

Agreed. The likelihood of him ever being a star isn't favorable. I'd be more than happy if he's able to develop to the point where he's in the same tier as guys like JJ Redick and Wally Sczerb.

Our roster compliments Nik's game pretty well. Add in that he'll have ample playing time and a defined role on a team that emphasizes player development and you have an ideal situation for a guy like Nik looking to rebound off an underwhelming rookie campaign. If he's unable to make a decent leap next year then I'll be pretty discouraged.
Ericb5
RealGM
Posts: 10,303
And1: 3,377
Joined: Jan 08, 2014
       

Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#25 » by Ericb5 » Wed Jul 15, 2015 2:58 am

Skates wrote:Stauskas never looked like a SG/SF type, but he handles the ball pretty well to play as a distributor and ballhandler at the two next to a scoring PG, so he has some versatility that way. I'm not sure he will ever be better than a windmill who tries on defense and poaches the passing lanes a bit, but on offense I think he has a lot to offer with his shooting and ballhandling.


I agree.

He isn't a point guard, but he does have some point guard skills. His floor game is pretty underrated imo.

I like the fact that he is not only a great shooter, but he has some skills in getting his own shots too. I'm not saying that he can always get his own shot, but he is better than you would think.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums
PhilasFinest
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 3,581
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
     

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#26 » by PhilasFinest » Wed Jul 15, 2015 3:11 am

sixers hoops wrote:Anyone expecting a star because he was drafted 8th will likely be disappointed. However, I think he has the potential to be a really nice part of the rotation.


Agree 100%. That being said, def think he can become a quality, sharpshooting wing in the mold of JJ Reddick/Kyle Korver. A player like those 2 is a really valuable addition to the roster, especially with a dominant big man and in a tempo/ball movement offense like Spurs/Hawks run.
SparksFly87 wrote:Towns got boat feet and gets off the ground very slow with a lack of explosiveness . He is a rich mans Henry Sims to me. No thanks .
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 61,358
And1: 23,531
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#27 » by 76ciology » Wed Jul 15, 2015 3:27 am

Only way Stauskas turns into a star is if improved his lateral speed and ball handling then eventually playing a PG. A.K.A. "OSU ET/DLO" scheme.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
NJ SixerFan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,310
And1: 951
Joined: Dec 30, 2011

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#28 » by NJ SixerFan » Wed Jul 15, 2015 11:18 am

I ultimately see him as a high-end 6th/7th man who can come in and be a scoring threat on the 2nd unit or a very nice fit as a starter on the wing depending on what the pg and sf positions look like when it is time to compete.
Kobblehead
RealGM
Posts: 40,028
And1: 19,107
Joined: Apr 15, 2010
 

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#29 » by Kobblehead » Wed Jul 15, 2015 12:49 pm

He's a passable secondary distributor, at best. I seriously doubt he ever transitions to the PG spot. I heard some people on here mention that, in passing, about Jordan McRae, too. That's not his game, either.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,683
And1: 16,055
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#30 » by Sixerscan » Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:47 pm

Kobblehead wrote:He's a passable secondary distributor, at best. I seriously doubt he ever transitions to the PG spot. I heard some people on here mention that, in passing, about Jordan McRae, too. That's not his game, either.


The McRae thing came from the article about the Sixers trying him out at point in summer league. Which was probably just some half baked idea the Sixers tried in practice one day.

Stauskas actually played a decent amount of PG in college and was very effective in the P&R. He'd never be a Chris Paul or even MCW level ball dominator but I could see him improving to the point where he could the 1 guard in offenses that are more interchangeable like the triangle or certain motion sets.
phillthy13
Sophomore
Posts: 244
And1: 57
Joined: Apr 24, 2014
         

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#31 » by phillthy13 » Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:50 pm

Kobblehead wrote:He's a passable secondary distributor, at best. I seriously doubt he ever transitions to the PG spot. I heard some people on here mention that, in passing, about Jordan McRae, too. That's not his game, either.


Have you seen them play in the NBA in a system like ours? Their "game" is far from being established yet, who knows what they can turn out to be...consistency can create some really interesting results.
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 61,358
And1: 23,531
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#32 » by 76ciology » Wed Jul 15, 2015 1:53 pm

Can anyone confirm this and this is just a theory of mine. Did the Kings went out to find the next Steph Curry with the way they overpaid to get Jimmer and Stauskas? I mean, they did hire Mike Malone who was a former assistant coach of GSW as headcoach.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
User avatar
MCtripDub
Pro Prospect
Posts: 790
And1: 254
Joined: Mar 01, 2014
Location: Manila, Philippines: Home of Team Gilas Pilipinas #Puso
Contact:
     

Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#33 » by MCtripDub » Thu Jul 16, 2015 8:32 pm

Man, rashad Vaughn is awesome! I just remembered that we were prepared to offer two seconds to move up for him, and we traded two seconds to acquire nik stauskas. Guess we were really going for shooting this offseason huh? Wonder if we still woulda gone for nik if we had drafted Vaughn


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
bebopdeluxe
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 3,879
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
Location: philly

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#34 » by bebopdeluxe » Thu Jul 16, 2015 9:19 pm

Skates wrote:Stauskas never looked like a SG/SF type, but he handles the ball pretty well to play as a distributor and ballhandler at the two next to a scoring PG, so he has some versatility that way. I'm not sure he will ever be better than a windmill who tries on defense and poaches the passing lanes a bit, but on offense I think he has a lot to offer with his shooting and ballhandling.


Good point about his ball handling ability. It should allow for the Sixers to look at combo/scoring options at the other guard position. A Wroten/Sauce backcourt might actually work, because Nik can run the P'n'R effectively. I also think that he could eventually become a competent defender...not a Butler/Klay-level guy, but someone who will not be a sieve. It was my biggest frustration/concern when Korver was here - he always gave effort, he was just, shall we say, "laterally challenged". Sauce has a bit more athleticism than Korver - he just needs to hit the weights and get stronger. Korver eventually had to move to the 3...and to his credit he seems to have put on some bulk/strength to handle the banging of the SF position and offset his lack of lateral quicks.
Unbreakable99
General Manager
Posts: 8,752
And1: 3,993
Joined: Jul 04, 2014

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#35 » by Unbreakable99 » Thu Jul 16, 2015 10:21 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/nstauskas11/status/621799972892094464[/tweet]
76thBearCub
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,591
And1: 2,718
Joined: Dec 06, 2011
     

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#36 » by 76thBearCub » Fri Jul 17, 2015 12:26 am

When I first heard about the Sacramento trade all I knew was we got him. I thought that was cool, then I heard about the swaps and the future first headed our way. I've since cleaned myself up and decided the Kings franchise is some kind of sick child of Billy King and Isiah Thomas.

I'm now off topic, but what I feel is the trade was magnificent and anything this guy brings is absolute gravy.

I don't personally ever see him being a starting guard on a hopefully contending team for us but if he is a nice option off the bench for us then I am doing backflips.
GameofLoans666
Ballboy
Posts: 6
And1: 5
Joined: Apr 30, 2015

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#37 » by GameofLoans666 » Mon Jul 20, 2015 8:38 pm

Forget your low expectations. Stauskas is going to be the third to fourth best guy on a championship caliber squad.

He can shoot off the dribble, which is incredibly rare.

He has great ball handling ability for a SG.

He has solid vision for a SG.

He's an intelligent player, which is what matters in defense since 80% of NBA defense in the perimeter is just knowing your rotations.

He has above average height for a shooting guard.

I'm all in on Sauce and I'm driving that bandwagon. He's going to be freaking spectacular this year and will bring excitement back to the city. Stauskas is the case of a player's destiny being altered by the team he's on. With the Sixers, this is the opportunity of his life to become his best case scenario.
User avatar
roma258
Analyst
Posts: 3,385
And1: 901
Joined: Jul 06, 2010
   

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#38 » by roma258 » Mon Jul 20, 2015 9:31 pm

GameofLoans666 wrote:Forget your low expectations. Stauskas is going to be the third to fourth best guy on a championship caliber squad.

He can shoot off the dribble, which is incredibly rare.

He has great ball handling ability for a SG.

He has solid vision for a SG.

He's an intelligent player, which is what matters in defense since 80% of NBA defense in the perimeter is just knowing your rotations.

He has above average height for a shooting guard.

I'm all in on Sauce and I'm driving that bandwagon. He's going to be freaking spectacular this year and will bring excitement back to the city. Stauskas is the case of a player's destiny being altered by the team he's on. With the Sixers, this is the opportunity of his life to become his best case scenario.

I hope you're right dude. He showed some stuff at Michigan and looked pretty impressive at times. He strikes me as one of those guys where everything has to be right in order to click. He can't just get by on overwhelming athleticism, great size or pure stroke. But if he's fit, placed in the right system that gets him good looks and allows him to be a secondary ballhandler, I can see him flourishing in the NBA. Anyone that's played hoops knows that some players just go out there and kick ass no matter what, and some guys need the right teammates and the right circumstances to succeed.
Liberté, égalité, lotteré
Sportfan73
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,905
And1: 1,315
Joined: Jun 18, 2015
   

Re: Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#39 » by Sportfan73 » Mon Jul 20, 2015 9:41 pm

roma258 wrote:
GameofLoans666 wrote:Forget your low expectations. Stauskas is going to be the third to fourth best guy on a championship caliber squad.

He can shoot off the dribble, which is incredibly rare.

He has great ball handling ability for a SG.

He has solid vision for a SG.

He's an intelligent player, which is what matters in defense since 80% of NBA defense in the perimeter is just knowing your rotations.

He has above average height for a shooting guard.

I'm all in on Sauce and I'm driving that bandwagon. He's going to be freaking spectacular this year and will bring excitement back to the city. Stauskas is the case of a player's destiny being altered by the team he's on. With the Sixers, this is the opportunity of his life to become his best case scenario.

I hope you're ride dude. He showed some stuff at Michigan and looked pretty impressive at times. He strikes me as one of those guys where everything has to be right in order to click. He can't just get by on overwhelming athleticism, great size or pure stroke. But if he's fit, placed in the right system that gets him good looks and allows him to be a secondary ballhandler, I can see him flourishing in the NBA. Anyone that's played hoops knows that some players just go out there and kick ass no matter what, and some guys need the right teammates and the right circumstances to succeed.
all I know is anyone who thinks last year can be used as ANY type of a sample or example is dead wrong. A 20 year old rookie that got speradic playing time and went through 3 coaches all while playing with a lot of volume shooting ball hogs is a complete throw out year. The way he operated the pick and roll at Michigan reminds of a poor man's harden and I think he plays that role with us this year
User avatar
Jstock12
RealGM
Posts: 10,508
And1: 17,289
Joined: Jun 24, 2012

Re: Player Discussion: Nik Stauskas 

Post#40 » by Jstock12 » Tue Jul 21, 2015 2:33 am

White Harden-lite

Return to Philadelphia 76ers