2017 Pick Watch (Sac Swap Rights, LAL pick)

phiphan · Post #61 » by **phiphan** » Fri Jun 3, 2016 4:34 pm

ET Da Gawd wrote:Lonzo Ball is the Point Guard Y'all

No

Kobblehead · Post #62 » by **Kobblehead** » Sat Jun 4, 2016 4:43 pm

Wait until they play a college season first.

This time last year, we all thought Skal and Jaylen Brown were franchise players.

skywalker33 · Post #63 » by **skywalker33** » Sat Jun 4, 2016 7:30 pm

sixers4real wrote:I want Tatum to be our starting SF. With Covington on the bench. Something like Dunn Tatum Simmons Embiid is scary

Speaking of Dunn, how do you expect to get him and Simmons ?? If he falls to the #7 pick, DEN really won't have interest, but SAC would at #8 I'm sure. What would you guys think would be a good trade for the #7 pick to get Dunn and keep him away from the Kings. And looking at the Nuggets roster, I don't see a lot on interest in Noel or Okafor being we have Jokic, Nurkic and Lauvergne.

OleSchool · Post #64 » by **OleSchool** » Sat Jun 4, 2016 8:02 pm

skywalker33 wrote:
sixers4real wrote:I want Tatum to be our starting SF. With Covington on the bench. Something like Dunn Tatum Simmons Embiid is scary

Speaking of Dunn, how do you expect to get him and Simmons ?? If he falls to the #7 pick, DEN really won't have interest, but SAC would at #8 I'm sure. What would you guys think would be a good trade for the #7 pick to get Dunn and keep him away from the Kings. And looking at the Nuggets roster, I don't see a lot on interest in Noel or Okafor being we have Jokic, Nurkic and Lauvergne.

Then you just answered your own question, Philly and Denver aren't good trading partners

skywalker33 · Post #65 » by **skywalker33** » Sat Jun 4, 2016 8:47 pm

OleSchool wrote:
skywalker33 wrote:
sixers4real wrote:I want Tatum to be our starting SF. With Covington on the bench. Something like Dunn Tatum Simmons Embiid is scary

Speaking of Dunn, how do you expect to get him and Simmons ?? If he falls to the #7 pick, DEN really won't have interest, but SAC would at #8 I'm sure. What would you guys think would be a good trade for the #7 pick to get Dunn and keep him away from the Kings. And looking at the Nuggets roster, I don't see a lot on interest in Noel or Okafor being we have Jokic, Nurkic and Lauvergne.

Then you just answered your own question, Philly and Denver aren't good trading partners

Well, fair enough, but if SAC gets a real PG like Dunn, don't expect swap anytime soon, he'll make DMC, Gay and McLemore look a lot better than Rondo did.

OleSchool · Post #66 » by **OleSchool** » Sat Jun 4, 2016 8:52 pm

skywalker33 wrote:
OleSchool wrote:
skywalker33 wrote:
Speaking of Dunn, how do you expect to get him and Simmons ?? If he falls to the #7 pick, DEN really won't have interest, but SAC would at #8 I'm sure. What would you guys think would be a good trade for the #7 pick to get Dunn and keep him away from the Kings. And looking at the Nuggets roster, I don't see a lot on interest in Noel or Okafor being we have Jokic, Nurkic and Lauvergne.

Then you just answered your own question, Philly and Denver aren't good trading partners

Well, fair enough, but if SAC gets a real PG like Dunn, don't expect swap anytime soon, he'll make DMC, Gay and McLemore look a lot better than Rondo did.

Awesome! Thanks for your analysis

Arsenal · Post #67 » by **Arsenal** » Sat Jun 4, 2016 9:09 pm

skywalker33 wrote:
sixers4real wrote:I want Tatum to be our starting SF. With Covington on the bench. Something like Dunn Tatum Simmons Embiid is scary

Speaking of Dunn, how do you expect to get him and Simmons ?? If he falls to the #7 pick, DEN really won't have interest, but SAC would at #8 I'm sure. What would you guys think would be a good trade for the #7 pick to get Dunn and keep him away from the Kings. And looking at the Nuggets roster, I don't see a lot on interest in Noel or Okafor being we have Jokic, Nurkic and Lauvergne.

If Dunn falls to #7, what do the Nuggets need to trade him to us?

skywalker33 · Post #68 » by **skywalker33** » Sat Jun 4, 2016 9:23 pm

I could see the lesser of the PHI(SAC)/LAL 2017 pick. I could see something like Dunn + 19 for lesser of 2017 1st and a future 2nd

sixers4real · Post #69 » by **sixers4real** » Sat Jun 4, 2016 9:33 pm

skywalker33 wrote:
sixers4real wrote:I want Tatum to be our starting SF. With Covington on the bench. Something like Dunn Tatum Simmons Embiid is scary

Speaking of Dunn, how do you expect to get him and Simmons ?? If he falls to the #7 pick, DEN really won't have interest, but SAC would at #8 I'm sure. What would you guys think would be a good trade for the #7 pick to get Dunn and keep him away from the Kings. And looking at the Nuggets roster, I don't see a lot on interest in Noel or Okafor being we have Jokic, Nurkic and Lauvergne.

Trading Okafor to Celtics of Suns for #3 or #4 + Smart/Bradley/Knight

Post #70 » by **Sixerscan** » Sat Jun 4, 2016 9:51 pm

Kings Felt 'Deflated' After George Karl Wasn't Fired Midseason

That team is such a freaking mess...

freshie2 · Post #71 » by **freshie2** » Sat Jun 4, 2016 10:05 pm

Sixerscan wrote:
Kings Felt 'Deflated' After George Karl Wasn't Fired Midseason

That team is such a freaking mess...

Which makes that pick and the potential swap soooooo valuable.

Arsenal · Post #72 » by **Arsenal** » Sun Jun 5, 2016 4:47 pm

Sixerscan wrote:
Kings Felt 'Deflated' After George Karl Wasn't Fired Midseason

That team is such a freaking mess...

That's what happens when you attempt to build around a cancer like DeMarcus Cousins. Thankfully Hinkie took advantage!

PhillyNj · Post #73 » by **PhillyNj** » Mon Jun 6, 2016 12:22 am

skywalker33 wrote:
OleSchool wrote:
skywalker33 wrote:
Speaking of Dunn, how do you expect to get him and Simmons ?? If he falls to the #7 pick, DEN really won't have interest, but SAC would at #8 I'm sure. What would you guys think would be a good trade for the #7 pick to get Dunn and keep him away from the Kings. And looking at the Nuggets roster, I don't see a lot on interest in Noel or Okafor being we have Jokic, Nurkic and Lauvergne.

Then you just answered your own question, Philly and Denver aren't good trading partners

Well, fair enough, but if SAC gets a real PG like Dunn, don't expect swap anytime soon, he'll make DMC, Gay and McLemore look a lot better than Rondo did.

Lol, no way is better than Rondo this year. Book it.

Post #74 » by **HartfordWhalers** » Wed Jun 15, 2016 2:40 pm

skywalker33 wrote:I could see the lesser of the PHI(SAC)/LAL 2017 pick. I could see something like Dunn + 19 for lesser of 2017 1st and a future 2nd

So if LAL is top 3 (no pick conveyed) and Philly is top 3, that would mean Philly's pick which could even be #1?

FreesFro · Post #75 » by **FreesFro** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 2:57 pm

Lebron leaving Cleveland is a real possibility per Woj. We've all heard it and thought it, but when a guy like Woj says it you have to believe it.

Lakers and Miami possible destinations. Would hurt our Lakers pick obviously.

Arsenal · Post #76 » by **Arsenal** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:01 pm

FreesFro wrote:Lebron leaving Cleveland is a real possibility per Woj. We've all heard it and thought it, but when a guy like Woj says it you have to believe it.

Lakers and Miami possible destinations. Would hurt our Lakers pick obviously.

No chance in hell. Woj loses credibility peddling nonsense like this.

Lakerglory1 · Post #77 » by **Lakerglory1** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:51 pm

The Lakers will be better overall next year, won't make the playoffs in the west but I can see them winning 30-42 games "if free agency goes as planned", Ingram is ready to produce in the NBA. I expect your pick via LAL to be in the high teens.

Unbreakable99 · Post #78 » by **Unbreakable99** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:04 pm

Lakerglory1 wrote:The Lakers will be better overall next year, won't make the playoffs in the west but I can see them winning 30-42 games "if free agency goes as planned", Ingram is ready to produce in the NBA. I expect your pick via LAL to be in the high teens.

I don't see that. The Lakers will still stink again. I hope they are better and they should be. I think they have a decent chance of having the 4th worse to 6th worst record. Right now who are they better than? I think the Sixers will win more than them. Brooklyn? I don't know. Now that I think about it, unless the Lakers get a key FA I think they might in fact have the worst record in the league.

OleSchool · Post #79 » by **OleSchool** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:06 pm

Lakerglory1 wrote:The Lakers will be better overall next year, won't make the playoffs in the west but I can see them winning 30-42 games "if free agency goes as planned", Ingram is ready to produce in the NBA. I expect your pick via LAL to be in the high teens.

High teens?? Really? So you're saying the LAL are going to win 30+ more games this year than last? How exactly? Who are they leapfrogging over in the west?

Post #80 » by **HartfordWhalers** » Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:10 pm

If you add last years 30 win improvement with this upcoming years 30 game improvement, you are going to have a 81 win Laker team, no?