ivysixer2000 wrote:76ciology wrote:ivysixer2000 wrote: Just saying, they have way too many SFs, but I hope they do spend a whole lot of money on another one.
For the Celtics,I'd rather have a log jam with George,crowder,Jaylen&Tatum and the redundancy of Hayward than the luxury of Noel.
If they think they need a C, they could have easily went for Jordan Bell over Ojeleye. That saves 20+M on Noel, that could be used for Hayward or Blake Griffin
Well guess I'm not a fan of Horford at all, hes a PF to me and I would want a real rim protector.
I know our log jam at center was bad, but a log jam is still a log jam. Just cause the Warriors and Cavs have won a certain way doesn't mean thats the only way it should be. Just cause NE has won throwing the ball doesn't mean thats the only way to win. I understand its a copycat league, but your copying off of someone who did something different.
Noone that plays real mins for the Cavs or Warriors can guard Emiid, and the reason is there are no real centers in the league on good teams so they adapted to that. Doesn't mean we have to follow that path.
At some point, I also believed that.
But teams now can pack the paint that is tough for a post heavy offense of bigs. Then you have to consider how crazy the elite's team's transition offense that forces teams to lean over a positionless line-up that has guys guarding multiple positions ( a wing heavy celtics lineup can do that).
..and the league wants that because that is what sells.
There are two types of wrestling. Like basketball, the ones that are bigs oriented is like professional wrestling. WWE is like the current high octane small ball NBA.
To beat the GSW, you need a positionless roster that can play pace and space but with better size. And I think we're trending towards that.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.