Tom Moore 2.0
Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, Foshan, sixers hoops
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,779
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 07, 2005
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
a one year deal for 6 mill is ok...duhon can split time with lou or jrue thru out the season.
they just dont want to go beyond 1 year..thats the main point
they just dont want to go beyond 1 year..thats the main point
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,371
- And1: 111
- Joined: Jun 10, 2003
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
Ming wrote:The rule is a team can take on no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade. So from my understanding the Knicks can receive no more than 6mil * 125% + 100,000 = 7.6mil back if they only trade Duhon.
Thanks Ming. I was just rounding in the example I gave, but this is obviously more precise. It might also be closer to something Miller may accept. The years involved could be an issue though.
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 245
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jul 05, 2008
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
Last year, RWB and Watson, example. Talented player don't need to split with average player. 6M is a big money for a second.
Can Duhon provide us with PO home-court advantage?
Can Duhon provide us with PO home-court advantage?
It's time to jazz with Hayward and Favors!
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 217
- And1: 11
- Joined: Oct 05, 2003
- Location: Hong Kong
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
Gsraider wrote:Ming wrote:The rule is a team can take on no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade. So from my understanding the Knicks can receive no more than 6mil * 125% + 100,000 = 7.6mil back if they only trade Duhon.
Thanks Ming. I was just rounding in the example I gave, but this is obviously more precise. It might also be closer to something Miller may accept. The years involved could be an issue though.
NP. I think the Knicks would want to preserve their cap room next year. So it is very unlikely for them to offer more than 1 year. If Miller is willing to accept 1-year 7.6mil then he can just sign with the Sixers. I am not sure but I think the Sixers will still be about 2mil under luxury tax after that.
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,371
- And1: 111
- Joined: Jun 10, 2003
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
Ming wrote:NP. I think the Knicks would want to preserve their cap room next year. So it is very unlikely for them to offer more than 1 year. If Miller is willing to accept 1-year 7.6mil then he can just sign with the Sixers. I am not sure but I think the Sixers will still be about 2mil under luxury tax after that.
This assumes that the Sixers and Miller still want to stay married and that Philly is even willing to go over $6 million at all. From recent comments, I wonder if Philly even wants to do the one year deal with Miller anymore.
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
- sixerswillrule
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,663
- And1: 3,593
- Joined: Jul 24, 2003
- Location: Disappointment
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
roll wrote:If we've decided to not try to contend, why we need average players to take minutes of our youngsters? What kind of craft Duhon can teach Holiday? Seat on the bench? =)
The worst case scenario(or best case for those lottery hopefuls) is that we we barely miss the playoffs and get the 12th-14th pick. What's the point of that? Seriously...It's best that we get solid player like Duhon or Blake and try to get that 4th seed. Then give it our all in the playoffs...That's what I want to see happen. Holiday shouldn't be getting that much minutes this season anyway. Don't know if we would keep Lou or look to trade him, though.
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
- sixerswillrule
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,663
- And1: 3,593
- Joined: Jul 24, 2003
- Location: Disappointment
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,921
- And1: 1,965
- Joined: Sep 21, 2005
- Location: South Jersey
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
Hill staying in Phoenix. Now lets see if Miller to NY grows legs.
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 245
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jul 05, 2008
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
sixerswillrule wrote:It's best that we get solid player like Duhon or Blake and try to get that 4th seed
Question is can we try? I have already asked this question)
roll wrote:Can Duhon provide us with PO home-court advantage?
I see like this - with bounced back EB(or surprise from other playser like Thad) Dre have been downgraded to Duhon is fatal error, with Brand continues to struggle Duhon or Blake is not a factor for 4th.
It's time to jazz with Hayward and Favors!
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
- sixerswillrule
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,663
- And1: 3,593
- Joined: Jul 24, 2003
- Location: Disappointment
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
Towards the end of the last season we were still in the running for the 4th seed. I think we could be better next season...
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
- mega montana
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,547
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 12, 2002
- Location: Philly - Home Of MS16
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
- tmoore
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,345
- And1: 109
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
Am told Duhon's agent is exploring a possible sign-and-trade, including with the Sixers, but the Sixers would need more than Duhon in return for Miller.
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,779
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 07, 2005
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
dont the knicks have to get their PG in the sign and trade? they dont have any other PG.
at least we are trying to do something
at least we are trying to do something
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
- tmoore
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,345
- And1: 109
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
Perhaps Sixers are trying to get a pick, too -- just a guess.
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
- tmoore
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,345
- And1: 109
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
Agent is Kevin Bradbury -- Duhon has $6 million left on final year of contract.
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
- tmoore
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,345
- And1: 109
- Joined: Jun 17, 2009
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
sixerfan1976 wrote:dont the knicks have to get their PG in the sign and trade? they dont have any other PG.
at least we are trying to do something
Guess it would have to be Miller.
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,779
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 07, 2005
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
it all depends on if the knicks will do a 3/18 deal with miller..if so..then we can do it straight up..we wont get a pick...he can just sign there outright.....for 3 years...mid level..which is more like 16-17 mill.
best we can do is straight up......i just want this over..
best we can do is straight up......i just want this over..
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,150
- And1: 4,508
- Joined: Mar 17, 2004
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
Well what else could we get from New York along with Duhon? The salaries don't match up so what else could be thrown in? Sene, Harrington?? Who?, What? Anthony Roberson? is he still there? I'd rather have him than Duhon. Seriously I like Chris Duhon but I not sure I want to see him run our team for the next two years which is what would happen knowing the way this front office works.
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,529
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 04, 2003
- Location: Bryn Mawr, PA
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
I could understand why the Blazers would consider taking on a 34 year old PG, but the Knicks? They are really far away from competing for a title. True, they might get Lebron, but by the time they can get the right players around Lebron (if they get him, a big if) it will be tune before they can put the right players around him.
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
- sixerswillrule
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,663
- And1: 3,593
- Joined: Jul 24, 2003
- Location: Disappointment
Re: Tom Moore 2.0
tmoore wrote:Am told Duhon's agent is exploring a possible sign-and-trade, including with the Sixers, but the Sixers would need more than Duhon in return for Miller.
Want or need? I'm guessing it's want, because the salaries should match. Unless the deal Miller would get starts at over 7.3 mil.