ImageImageImage

Tom Moore 3.0

Moderators: HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Sixerscan, Foshan, sixers hoops

The Guilty Party
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,697
And1: 8
Joined: Aug 26, 2002
Location: Zoo Jersey
 

Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#1 » by The Guilty Party » Wed Sep 9, 2009 2:35 pm

Gsraider wrote:Now this move, I like a lot. I happen to agree with those who suggest that Carney often plays too fast and cannot harness his athleticism. I have also seen him play excellent defense from time to time and get really hot from distance. When you are filling out your roster with minimum type contracts, every player is going to have warts of some kind. If you can find a guy that can potentially give you something on any given night for this price, it's a good signing if you ask me. If he fails completely, you spent the minimum and he leaves next season. No harm, no foul.


Above is the last post from Moore 2.0.
Dedicated_76ers_fan
Banned User
Posts: 12,912
And1: 2
Joined: Sep 30, 2006

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#2 » by Dedicated_76ers_fan » Wed Sep 9, 2009 2:45 pm

Now, many have disagreed with me on a number of issues but this is one we'll all agree on: If Rodney Carney had handles.........MAN. What'd a sick player he'd be. He has some explosive hops and he's quick as well. And he's a good 3pt shooter. Handles would turn him from a role-player, to a starter.

It's not that he plays too fast, it's just he doesn't have handles and that's the fundamental thing expected of a 2 guard.

There's still hope, he was drafted 3 years ago(the same time as Kevin Kolb). He can still develop those handles. It's not like he's old or anything.
User avatar
SixersfutureGM
Senior
Posts: 670
And1: 45
Joined: Jun 17, 2007

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#3 » by SixersfutureGM » Wed Sep 9, 2009 3:00 pm

forgot about holiday, over the course of the season he will likely take mins from ivey and green as they should ease him into that role plus they are gonna try to get wins early because people wants to save their jobs. Not that we have a deep bench because we dont but the people on our bench are close to each other talent wise that it will be interesting to see who doesnt dress for games.
Darain wrote:Dude is like 6-10, 6-12 at the most

But he is definitely not 7 foot


Darain wrote:Prime Wilt wouldn't be anymore than Kwame Brown in today's NBA


Idunno who you are Mister Darain but you are a signature gold mine.. keep them coming!
ankle420breaker
General Manager
Posts: 8,921
And1: 1,965
Joined: Sep 21, 2005
Location: South Jersey

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#4 » by ankle420breaker » Wed Sep 9, 2009 3:32 pm

Asked this in the other thread...

Does Carney instantly become our 2nd best 3 point shooter?
User avatar
tmoore
Head Coach
Posts: 6,345
And1: 109
Joined: Jun 17, 2009

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#5 » by tmoore » Wed Sep 9, 2009 4:24 pm

Questionable. He's capable of being that, but he has to cut down on 3s early in the clock.
Gsraider
Starter
Posts: 2,371
And1: 111
Joined: Jun 10, 2003

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#6 » by Gsraider » Wed Sep 9, 2009 4:34 pm

Dedicated_76ers_fan wrote:It's not that he plays too fast, it's just he doesn't have handles and that's the fundamental thing expected of a 2 guard.


I'm going to have to somewhat disagree here. I agree that Carney doesn't possess a good handle. However, I also think Carney has always played the game too fast and does not allow it to come to him. If Carney were to spend an entire off-season on improving his handle, I would be hopeful that good coaching could help him with his patience and understanding of the game. Right now though, the fact that he plays too fast only exacerbates his poor handle.

Sadly, that's why a talented athlete like this can be had for the league minimum.
ankle420breaker
General Manager
Posts: 8,921
And1: 1,965
Joined: Sep 21, 2005
Location: South Jersey

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#7 » by ankle420breaker » Wed Sep 9, 2009 4:44 pm

tmoore wrote:Questionable. He's capable of being that, but he has to cut down on 3s early in the clock.


True. He tries to do too much. Just learning some patience on the offensive end would really help his game.
Dedicated_76ers_fan
Banned User
Posts: 12,912
And1: 2
Joined: Sep 30, 2006

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#8 » by Dedicated_76ers_fan » Wed Sep 9, 2009 5:00 pm

Do you think coming to a team where he's familar with the guys and a spark off the bench would help him in those areas?
Dedicated_76ers_fan
Banned User
Posts: 12,912
And1: 2
Joined: Sep 30, 2006

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#9 » by Dedicated_76ers_fan » Wed Sep 9, 2009 5:03 pm

Via Twitter: Whole 2nd unit(And Thad/Lou) are working out. Great. Now, where's Sam I am. For all that talk about a fresh start. I hope he's working on his ball skills, not his computer tech skills.

If he wants to be a technician, retire from the NBA. That's 12 million off of our salary space. Right?
tk76
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,615
And1: 734
Joined: Jul 21, 2006

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#10 » by tk76 » Wed Sep 9, 2009 7:50 pm

Have read the last few pages, so maybe this has already been discussed...

Regarding Carney's game, I worry that he is the wrong fit for the Princeton. I think he could thrive off the ball in a role similar to Ariza on the Lakers last year. But he is the wrong guy to ask to make decisions in a 2 or 3 man game. I remember him not only as a subpar ball handler and playing "too fast", but also as a guy with a one tract mind. He decides what he wants to do (drive or shoot) but can't read and react based on the defense.

Maybe he has improved or maybe they can use him on the weakside and not ask him to do so much. I do like what he can bring as an energy, role player. I just worry if he is a square peg when it comes to the Princeton Offense.

of course, for just the minimum its a good signing either way.
ankle420breaker
General Manager
Posts: 8,921
And1: 1,965
Joined: Sep 21, 2005
Location: South Jersey

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#11 » by ankle420breaker » Wed Sep 9, 2009 7:58 pm

tk76 wrote:Have read the last few pages, so maybe this has already been discussed...

Regarding Carney's game, I worry that he is the wrong fit for the Princeton. I think he could thrive off the ball in a role similar to Ariza on the Lakers last year. But he is the wrong guy to ask to make decisions in a 2 or 3 man game. I remember him not only as a subpar ball handler and playing "too fast", but also as a guy with a one tract mind. He decides what he wants to do (drive or shoot) but can't read and react based on the defense.

Maybe he has improved or maybe they can use him on the weakside and not ask him to do so much. I do like what he can bring as an energy, role player. I just worry if he is a square peg when it comes to the Princeton Offense.

of course, for just the minimum its a good signing either way.


I agree that he's not the best guy when it comes to making decisions with the ball, and that part of the princeton doesn't suit him at all, but on the other side of things I think he could also benefit from a motion offense like this. He's good at cutting to the basket and he if we swing the ball around the perimeter he could get left open quite a bit from outside. I could see guys finding him for some high percentage looks... I just don't see him creating offense for himself or others. It'll be interesting to see how he fits in. It's another contract year for Rodney.
User avatar
tmoore
Head Coach
Posts: 6,345
And1: 109
Joined: Jun 17, 2009

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#12 » by tmoore » Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:10 am

Dedicated_76ers_fan wrote:Do you think coming to a team where he's familiar with the guys and a spark off the bench would help him in those areas?


Could be. Didn't see much of him during his season in Minnesota, so I'm not sure how different he is now than 15 months ago. It's no lock he'll be in the regular rotation, but he has a shot for at least some spot minutes.
Kevin12
Banned User
Posts: 2,264
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 04, 2008

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#13 » by Kevin12 » Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:21 am

I don't even see 8 minutes a game for Rod.
User avatar
tmoore
Head Coach
Posts: 6,345
And1: 109
Joined: Jun 17, 2009

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#14 » by tmoore » Fri Sep 11, 2009 1:14 pm

Kevin12 wrote:I don't even see 8 minutes a game for Rod.


That's certainly possible.
User avatar
tmoore
Head Coach
Posts: 6,345
And1: 109
Joined: Jun 17, 2009

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#15 » by tmoore » Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:49 pm

Could be that Holiday, Green, Ivey and Carney will have 30-35 minutes a night between them, depending on the matchups and pace of the game. Could also change depending how Williams plays.
ankle420breaker
General Manager
Posts: 8,921
And1: 1,965
Joined: Sep 21, 2005
Location: South Jersey

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#16 » by ankle420breaker » Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:00 pm

I am REALLY hoping to see a whole lot of DNP CD's next to Ivey's name this year.
Kevin12
Banned User
Posts: 2,264
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 04, 2008

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#17 » by Kevin12 » Fri Sep 11, 2009 6:34 pm

tmoore wrote:Could be that Holiday, Green, Ivey and Carney will have 30-35 minutes a night between them, depending on the matchups and pace of the game. Could also change depending how Williams plays.


Take out Carney and replace that with Kapono.
User avatar
sixerswillrule
RealGM
Posts: 16,663
And1: 3,593
Joined: Jul 24, 2003
Location: Disappointment

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#18 » by sixerswillrule » Fri Sep 11, 2009 7:02 pm

I think he was just referring to PG and SG. Make it all 3 positions and add in Kapono, and it's about 45 minutes between those 5 backups.
User avatar
tmoore
Head Coach
Posts: 6,345
And1: 109
Joined: Jun 17, 2009

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#19 » by tmoore » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:56 am

Kevin12 wrote:
tmoore wrote:Could be that Holiday, Green, Ivey and Carney will have 30-35 minutes a night between them, depending on the matchups and pace of the game. Could also change depending how Williams plays.


Take out Carney and replace that with Kapono.


Yes, was specifically referring to guard minutes. Would think Kapono is mainly a "3."
User avatar
ProcessDoctor
RealGM
Posts: 10,035
And1: 5,194
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
   

Re: Tom Moore 3.0 

Post#20 » by ProcessDoctor » Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:11 pm

Why hasn't Sam Dalembert been traded yet? Wake me up when this happens. (Kaman for Daly, get it done!)
2023-2024 Philadelphia 76ers:

Lowry/Melton/Payne
Maxey/Hield/Downtin
Oubre/Batum/Council
Harris/Covington/Martin
Embiid/Reed/Bamba

Return to Philadelphia 76ers