Transfer Thread 9.0- Brazuca Edition

Post #1921 » by **5DOM** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:29 pm

Next Coming wrote:It's all kicking off now.

As you say that Arsenal deny Welbeck deal. Doesnt mean it's not gonna happen

Post #1922 » by **kdawg32086** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:31 pm

MaliBrah wrote:
Ted Lasso wrote:
As if Arsenal were ever going to get Falcao. They have already spent a net sum of €63m this summer.

If Welbeck gets regular playing time up front, he will be the best thing that ever happened to them. Arsenal fans, remember that line when Ozil, Sanchez, Walcott, and Cazorla start producing like crazy, and pundits & fans are making vague statements about the offence finally clicking.

our net spend isn't that big. Its around 30M I think , got money for vermaelen , dgorou , fabregas , vela , and eisfeld .but yeah we weren't going to get him with united paying 346K a week and a loan fee.

i'm down for welbeck , but only if its permanent. Not training him for united

Sounds like Welbeck is actually pushing for it to be permanent.

Looks like Ignasi Miquel is about to be sold to Norwich, which tells me we're going to sign a CB. Hoping Coquelin and Sanogo are on their way out as well. Would like to see Ryo on loan as well.

cgf · Post #1923 » by **cgf** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:32 pm

bryant08 wrote:
cgf wrote:
bryant08 wrote:Looks like Mendes is offering Moutinho around but United have denied interest thus far. Would be an upgrade but still not what we need.
que? Moutinho wouldn't fix your defense, but your midfield still needs a great passer at the 8 to link things, and Herrera is unlikely to be ready for that role right off of the bat, plus your midfield lacks depth anyway. Moutinho, di Maria, carrick, blind and Herrera would solve your midfield woes and leave just that joke of a defense.

Bigger need for a proper #6 in my eyes, I have more faith in Herrera's ability to excel as a #8 than Blind's as a #6.

Fair enough, I've got it the other way around, especially with carrick around once he gets fit and schneiderlin leaving for a new club in the next two windows.

Post #1924 » by **kdawg32086** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:34 pm

5DOM wrote:
Next Coming wrote:It's all kicking off now.

As you say that Arsenal deny Welbeck deal. Doesnt mean it's not gonna happen

Actually, I believe they denied that they were working on a deal to take Welbeck on loan. Haven't seen anything outright denying a permanent move, but have seen rumors about Welbeck wanting to make the move permanent.

MaliBrah · Post #1925 » by **MaliBrah** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:35 pm

Need a defender too , I think thats an even bigger need than a forward. We have 6 and 2 of them are made out of glass.

MaliBrah · Post #1926 » by **MaliBrah** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:35 pm

kdawg32086 wrote:
5DOM wrote:
Next Coming wrote:It's all kicking off now.

As you say that Arsenal deny Welbeck deal. Doesnt mean it's not gonna happen

Actually, I believe they denied that they were working on a deal to take Welbeck on loan. Haven't seen anything outright denying a permanent move, but have seen rumors about Welbeck wanting to make the move permanent.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/kpsundayworld/status/506508426743410690[/tweet]

Ted Lasso · Post #1927 » by **Ted Lasso** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:40 pm

MaliBrah wrote:
Ted Lasso wrote:
As if Arsenal were ever going to get Falcao. They have already spent a net sum of €63m this summer.

If Welbeck gets regular playing time up front, he will be the best thing that ever happened to them. Arsenal fans, remember that line when Ozil, Sanchez, Walcott, and Cazorla start producing like crazy, and pundits & fans are making vague statements about the offence finally clicking.

our net spend isn't that big. Its around 30M I think , got money for vermaelen , dgorou , fabregas , vela , and eisfeld .but yeah we weren't going to get him with united paying 346K a week and a loan fee.

i'm down for welbeck , but only if its permanent. Not training him for united

What was the cut from Cesc?

Post #1928 » by **kdawg32086** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:42 pm

MaliBrah wrote:
kdawg32086 wrote:
5DOM wrote:
As you say that Arsenal deny Welbeck deal. Doesnt mean it's not gonna happen

Actually, I believe they denied that they were working on a deal to take Welbeck on loan. Haven't seen anything outright denying a permanent move, but have seen rumors about Welbeck wanting to make the move permanent.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/kpsundayworld/status/506508426743410690[/tweet]

Maybe we're getting Huntelaar?

[tweet]https://twitter.com/DeadlineDayLive/status/506499299518464000[/tweet]

MaliBrah · Post #1929 » by **MaliBrah** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:42 pm

Ted Lasso wrote:What was the cut from Cesc?

5.5 M I think , and like 12M for vela

poeman · Post #1930 » by **poeman** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:44 pm

kdawg32086 wrote:
MaliBrah wrote:
kdawg32086 wrote:
Actually, I believe they denied that they were working on a deal to take Welbeck on loan. Haven't seen anything outright denying a permanent move, but have seen rumors about Welbeck wanting to make the move permanent.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/kpsundayworld/status/506508426743410690[/tweet]

Maybe we're getting Huntelaar?

[tweet]https://twitter.com/DeadlineDayLive/status/506499299518464000[/tweet]

Honestly, I would love a Klaas move to us.

Captain_Obvious · Post #1931 » by **Captain_Obvious** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:45 pm

kdawg32086 wrote:
MaliBrah wrote:
kdawg32086 wrote:
Actually, I believe they denied that they were working on a deal to take Welbeck on loan. Haven't seen anything outright denying a permanent move, but have seen rumors about Welbeck wanting to make the move permanent.

[tweet]https://twitter.com/kpsundayworld/status/506508426743410690[/tweet]

Maybe we're getting Huntelaar?

[tweet]https://twitter.com/DeadlineDayLive/status/506499299518464000[/tweet]

That would be an overpay. Wenger rarely overpays so I doubt it. At the moment.

Ted Lasso · Post #1932 » by **Ted Lasso** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:47 pm

MaliBrah wrote:
Ted Lasso wrote:What was the cut from Cesc?

5.5 M I think , and like 12M for vela

Vela was 15m, i think. Transfermarkt didn't have those two numbers (probably because they edited the original transactions which affected previous windows' numbers), so net spending should be around €42m for the summer.

Post #1933 » by **5DOM** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:48 pm

Huntelaar is already 31. I think Welbeck's better value even considering the English premium

cgf · Post #1934 » by **cgf** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:48 pm

In the category of moves I don't understand, why arsenal didn't bring back vela still baffles me. Don't wanna go out and get lacazette for some reason? Fine, but vela was a no brained who could start next to Sanchez and theive.

Ted Lasso · Post #1935 » by **Ted Lasso** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:48 pm

poeman wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/DeadlineDayLive/status/506499299518464000[/tweet]

Barfy Barferson! He is 31 years old.

Ted Lasso · Post #1936 » by **Ted Lasso** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:51 pm

cgf wrote:In the category of moves I don't understand, why arsenal didn't bring back vela still baffles me. Don't wanna go out and get lacazette for some reason? Fine, but vela was a no brained who could start next to Sanchez and theive.

Why would you take a risk with a player who previously failed to shined for you just because he did so in a distinct environment when you stand to make millions for him out of nowhere?

Not to mention, he's not the sort of player they need.

Post #1937 » by **kdawg32086** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:51 pm

[tweet]https://twitter.com/DeadlineDayLive/status/506513048920920064[/tweet]

Hmm...

MaliBrah · Post #1938 » by **MaliBrah** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:55 pm

real madrid want guarin? loool

poeman · Post #1939 » by **poeman** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 6:58 pm

Real madrid want everyone lol

Rasho Brezec · Post #1940 » by **Rasho Brezec** » Mon Sep 1, 2014 7:02 pm

kdawg32086 wrote:[tweet]https://twitter.com/DeadlineDayLive/status/506513048920920064[/tweet]

Hmm...

Do it Wenger, make things interesting.