DirtyDez wrote:Hill would gladly go to a contender.
He's said multiple times that if he's not with Phoenix, he's retiring.
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
DirtyDez wrote:Hill would gladly go to a contender.
Da_Reel_Kboy wrote:DirtyDez wrote:I'd rather take Vince's expiring then LMA's long-ass deal. He's a good player just too expensive. I'd prob do Gortat/Bass/Pietrus/Vince for Amare/J-Rich/Hill over any Portland or San Antonio deal.
Yikes. If that deal goes through I will try to see how far I can stick a computer monitor down my throat. Sorry, but that trade just plain sucks for us.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
DirtyDez wrote:Like i said i'd rather do it than the Portland deal. I'd rather Amare walk before both. D-Lee is my fav for and S&T and i'm glad the Woj said Sarver is interested in him.
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
MrMiyagi wrote:Lob to DA for the win
lespaul89 wrote:grumpysaddle wrote:DirtyDez wrote:1. S&T Amare to NY for D-Lee (5 years, 65 mil)
2. Let him walk, sign Scola (5 years, 50 mil)
3. S&T to MIA for Beasley
Might be overpaying a tad bit for Lee/Scola but we save at least 30+ by not giving Amare max. Lee or Scola have no history with injuries. If Lawal developes into the player i think he can be, then we can trade Lee/Scola.
If Scola ends up in a Suns uniform I won't watch them anymore. A) I hate that guy for some reason, B) I couldn't stand looking at his melty-face all season long. NO THANKS.
So you call me dumb because I used dunking to evaluate Lee, but you use facial appearance to evaluate Scola.
Good one.
I don't see Lee being able to do well in a playoff series against the Lakers length.
Azsports77 wrote:Sarver has to know that if he lets Amare walk he will loose a significant portion of ticket sales this is why Sarver is willing to max out Amare just not in years due to health . But if we look at everything that's happened most teams are trying to get Bosh , Boozer , and Lebron before even thinking about Amare. I don't believe that Amare is all about the money as some might think for two reasons he has a boat load as it is and second he grew up in a family that every member is now a convict with the exception of him and his late father . So if you manage not to end up like them you are not all about something as petty as money . Everyone has pretty much booked it as Amare is gone but if Miami , Chicago , New York , New Jersey , and even Houston don't show interest in Amare right off the bat I just can't see him going to a place that doesn't make him their first target with the exception of Lebron obviously. There is one reason why Amare resigning with the Suns wouldn't shock me Sarver doesn't want to find out what happens when he becomes the most hated man in Phoenix and second he has gotten use to the ticket sales there will be a big loss in that area is he really able to accept that being the so called cheap owner which i don't believe considering he has been paying luxury tax! So here is a great question if Sarver caves and gives Amare the years but the amount he is signed to is less than what you thought Amare would be looking for how will you view Sarver ? Is he in a no win situation ? Because Steve Nash and the other players are great but they won't bring you ticket sales and thats something I don't think Sarver can live without!
thamadkant wrote:If Blazers are in the mix...
I'd tell them to keep Aldridge.
Send over Oden.
They can make Aldridge their "Odom" off the bench who plays close to 30 minutes anyways.
A rotation of Pryzibilla/Camby/Stoudemire/Aldridge on the 4/5 spot is a huge plus for them.
If Oden shows slow recovery from his injury, they might bite. But Im dreamin lol.
pidi wrote:if the blazers are realy in the mix i want aldridge, fernandez and theyre future first. but i doubt they do it, so we´ll let him walk.