nevetsov wrote:Young gun 6 wrote:With tucker hitting 30 soon. I wouldn't mind us getting another 27+ Sg defender when tucker starts declining. Even if it is to backup knight, we look so good with a good defensive Sg.
Wonder if Bullock could be that guy. Archie is a pretty good defender too, but he projects as more of just a 3&D guy to me.
I think Bullock could be that guy for sure. As far as Archie, I'd love for them to continue developing him at the Point. So long as he has the handles and BBIQ for it--IDK. But I can't imagine that he couldn't develop into a guy that is similar to Bledsoe. I mentioned a similar thought in a post yesterday, but if we sign Butler, we could ensure that at least 2 of the 3 of Knight, Bledsoe, and Butler be on the floor at all times, with Butler as a SG, but were we not to sign Butler, or any other SG or SF, and not re-sign Thornton or Green, I still think he have a solid rotation at the 1,2, and 3.
So, looking at their pre-draft measurements, I think we have the prospect of a better height/length at these positions than we've had as of late. With a 6' 3.5" Goran, 6'1.5" Bledsoe, and a 5' 10" Thomas at the PG and SG positions.
Bledsoe/Knight/Goodwin
PJ/Bullock/Bogdanovic
Warren/Marcus
Bledsoe--6' 1.5"--192--6' 7.5"--8' 2"
Knight--6' 3.25"--177--6' 6.75"--8' 2.5"
Goodwin-- 6' 5.25"--189--6' 9.5"--8' 6"
Bullock--6' 7"--200--6' 8.75"--8' 6"
Bogdanovic--6' 6.35"--200--6' 11.07"--8' 8.33"
Tucker--6'5"--225--?--?
Warren---6' 8.25"--220--6' 10.25"--8' 8"
Morris--6' 8.75"--230--6' 10"--8' 9.5"
So, if we can get Goodwin to be a legit combo guard, we could potentially trot out a line up of:
Goodwin - 6'5"
Bullock - 6'7"
Marcus - 6'9"
Wright - 6'10"
Len - 7'1"
That's quite a departure from what we've had, even as recent as two months ago when we'd have
Thomas - 5'10"
Bledsoe - 6'1.5"
Tucker - 6'5"
Green - 6'7"
Kieff - 6'10"
Point being, is that while we will likely field the combo I have above, it's possible. Big difference putting out an average 6'3" team, vs putting out an average 6'9" team. Not too mention, that regardless, while we may have taken a hit on the offensive side of the house with the loss of IT and Dragic, we've improved our D tremendously with the addition of Wright and Knight (vs Dragic or IT). And IMO, the added D vs what we had previously is more of an impact than the offense we lost.
So, sorry for the long, drawn out post in a game thread (
), but just has been on my mind as of late about how much better our defense is compared to over the last few years. Not that we didn't field PJ, but it's a huge difference to have him matched up against SGs vs matched up against SFs/PFs, because now instead of having Dragic defending SGs and PJ defending SFs, we can have PJ defend SGs, and Marcus or Warren defend SFs. And we now have Wright defending PFs/ Cs, instead of Plumlee. And even if we can get Bled/Knight/Bullock or Bled/Knight/PJ on the floor at the same time, we are in good shape defensively, as both Knight and Bullock are, or at least were considered, good defenders coming out.